mEDRA - Vedi metadati


 Deutsch      English     Italiano          


Home > Area Utenti Registrati > Monitoraggio > Vedi Metadati

Articolo

Dati del DOI
DOI 10.7336/academicus.2017.16.09
URL https://academicus.edu.al/?subpage=volumes&nr=16
Per questo DOI è attiva la Multiple Resolution:
MR URL https://academicus.edu.al
MR URL https://academicus.edu.al/nr16/Academicus-MMXVII-16-122-132.html
MR URL https://academicus.edu.al/nr16/Academicus-MMXVII-16-122-132.pdf
MR URL mailto:info@academicus.edu.al
MR URL https://academicus.edu.al/images/front_end/academicus.jpg
MR URL https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
DATI DI ACCESSO:
OA - Accesso aperto
Licenza OA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Dati della rivista

Titolo completo
Inglese (eng)
Academicus International Scientific Journal
Editore (01) Academicus International Scientific Journal
Paese di pubblicazione Albania (AL)
ISSN 20793715
Formato del prodotto Rivista Stampata (JB)
ISSN 23091088
Formato del prodotto Rivista Online (JD)

Dati del fascicolo
Numero del volume 16
Data del fascicolo (YYYY/MM) 2017 / 07
Dati dell'articolo
Titolo
Inglese (eng)
Three growing questions about Masonry
Di (autore) (A01) Davide C. Crimi
Affiliazione Independent Researcher, Catania, Italy, Dr.
Numero di Pagine 11
Prima Pagina 122
Ultima Pagina 132
Lingua del testo Inglese (eng)
Data di publicazione (YYYY/MM) 2017 / 07
Copyright 2017, Academicus
Abstract
Descrizione principale (01)
Through three capital questions, this short essay tries to offer a general panorama and a better understanding of the proteiform complex body or Masonry. Through by a multi-level hermeneutic, this study get the ambition to be comprehensible both to Readers who are not used to this kind of literature and to the ones advanced and skilled in symbolic thought. The main important conclusion owes the quality of the symbolic level, which is the property to refuse a single interpretation: notwithstanding, this does not prevent from a clear historical and political evaluation of the phenomena under analysis, according the methodologies of social sciences. This political evaluability drives to the main valuable output of the essay, which concerns the anthropological statement that the logical label of Masonry, with this name or many others, it exists since always. Under the category of initiatory institution, we may consider the step between individual and society, and a society inside a larger one. Evolving from the needs of the individuals to the ones of social groups, the matter joins to the land of political sciences. The sociological meaning can be posed under analytic view in reason of the functionalist meaning emerging from the alternative couples status-quo/emancipation and conservatism/progressivism. Through by this perspective, anyway the theme seems not to reveal much more, because this “proteiform complex body” manifest itself as something too much complex in its inner core to be considered in a way or in another. What remains is strictly symbolic, with some theological and eschatological points that refuse to be posed under restrain.

Per vedere le citazioni associate al DOI 10.7336/academicus.2017.16.09 clicca qui