Vedi metadata
I METADATI DI QUESTO DOI SONO STATI AGGIORNATI IL: 2021-12-07 23:30
Cite as
-
Titolo completo (Inglese)
Academicus International Scientific Journal
-
Editore
Academicus International Scientific Journal
-
ISSN
20793715 (Rivista Stampata)
23091088 (Rivista Online)
-
Numero del volume
21
-
Data del fascicolo (YYYY/MM)
2020/01
-
Titolo completo (Inglese)
The Functionality and Comparisons of BSC and Alternative Theories in Organisations: Business Perspective
-
Di (autore)
Affiliazione
London School of Science and Technology, United Kingdom, UK, Dr.
ORCID
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7641-7062
Affiliazione
Amity University, London, United Kingdom, UK, Dr.
Affiliazione
Brunel University, London, UK, Dr.
-
Numero di Pagine
14
-
Prima Pagina
59
-
Ultima Pagina
72
-
Lingua del testo
Inglese
-
Data di publicazione
2020/01
-
Copyright
2020 Academicus
Descrizione principale
The purpose of this research is to show the comparison of Resource-based view, Human capital, stakeholder as alternative theories and Balanced Scorecards (BSCs). Resource-Based View (RBV) appears to be limited with narrow implications as the strategic roles. RBV is forced on the internal organisation of a firm and it does not consider the external factors like the demand side of the market. A firm or an organisation may have the resources and the capabilities to gain a competitive advantage but still have no demand. RBV is not explicit on how particular market-based assets and capabilities contribute to generating and sustaining specific form of customer values. Accordingly, Human Capital theory (HC) assumes education increases productivity in the organisation, resulting in higher individual wages, but failed to provide adequate insight into the process through which education training are translated into higher wages. High level of educational attainment and quality may not potentially yield greater productivity and wages across the board. In the same vein, stakeholder theory has no learning and growth perspective required in the 21st century business but provides managers with clear mission and facilitates decision making. Balanced Scorecards (BSCs) has four perspectives: Financial, Customer, Internal development and Learning and growth perspective. It sets priorities by identifying, rationalising and aligning initiatives. The broad aim of this study is to shed light on limitations of these theories. The paper intends to identify future research questions that would help to remove fundamental barriers to pave the way to the company-wide performance in Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs): does BSC or alternative theory add significant value to SMEs? If it does add value, how does it enhance the performance of SMEs in emerging economies?
Elenco citazioni del
10.7336/academicus.2020.21.06
ISSN
20793715
Titolo della Testata
Academicus International Scientific Journal
Numero del fascicolo
6
Data del fascicolo
2012
Prima Pagina
41
Titolo completo
Tourism development, touristic local taxes and local human resources: A stable way to improve efficiency and effectiveness of local strategies of development
Autore
Musaraj, Arta [persona]
ISSN
20793715
Titolo della Testata
Academicus International Scientific Journal
Numero del fascicolo
4
Data del fascicolo
2011
Prima Pagina
35
Titolo completo
Albania, the human factor and sustainable development: a lesson from the present
Autore
Musaraj, Arta [persona]
Citazione non strutturata
Mehmet, C. K. and David, Fall 2007. A Balanced Scorecards Application in Health care: A case study: Journal of health care Finance.
Citazione non strutturata
Amit, R. and schoemaker, P. J. H. 1993. Strategic assets and organisational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 33-46.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140105
Citazione non strutturata
Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 27:99.
https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Citazione non strutturata
Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S. and Jones, T. M. 1999. Does stakeholder orientation mather? The relationship between
stakeholder management models and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 488-507.
https://doi.org/10.2307/256972
Citazione non strutturata
Charnchai, T. and James, G. P. 2007. Shareholder value ideology, Reciprocity and decision making in moral dilemmas. Journal of management issues, 19, N0. 3, pp. 379-396.
Citazione non strutturata
Conner, K. R. 1999. A historical comparison of resource-based value theory and five schools of thought within industrial organisation
economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm? Journal of Management, 17: 124-154.
https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700109
Citazione non strutturata
Corazzini, A. J. 1967. When should vocational education begin? The Journal of Human Resources, 2, 41-50.
https://doi.org/10.2307/144590
Citazione non strutturata
Das, T. K. and Teng, B. 2000. A Resource theory of strategic Alliances. Journal of management, 26, N0. 1, 31 61.
https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600105
Citazione non strutturata
Drucker, P. 1954. The practice of Management. New York, NY: Harvard Business Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Flore, B. 2004. A resource-based approach to performance and competition. An overview of the connections between resources and competitions. IAG working paper.
Citazione non strutturata
Griffith, J. and Alexander, J. 2002. Measuring Comparative Hospital Performance. Journal of Healthcare Management No 47. 1:
41-47.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00115514-200201000-00009
Citazione non strutturata
Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. 2001. ‘Strategic performance measurements and management in non-profit organisations’ Nonprofit
management and leadership, 11(3), 353-370.
https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.11308
Citazione non strutturata
Mahoney, J. T., and Pandian, J. R. 1992. The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 549-569.
Citazione non strutturata
Mark, B. 1976. The Empirical Status of Human Capital Theory: A slightly Jaundiced Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 14, N0 3 pp. 827-855.
Citazione non strutturata
McCloskey, D. N. The rhetoric of economics university of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, 1995.
Citazione non strutturata
McGrath, R.G. 1996. The trouble with competence: opportunities and limitations in the adolescence of the resource-based view. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of management, Cincinnati, OH.
Citazione non strutturata
O’Toole, J. 1991. Do good, do well: The business enterprise trust awards. California management review 33: 9-24.
https://doi.org/10.2307/41166658
Citazione non strutturata
Peteraf, M. A. 1993. A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 179-191.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140303
Citazione non strutturata
Peteraf, M. and Bergen, M. 2003. Scanning dynamic competitive landscapes: a market based and resource-based framework, Strategic
Management Journal, 24, 1027-1041.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.325
Citazione non strutturata
Schultz, T. W. 1981. Investing in People: The economics of education quality. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520318540
Citazione non strutturata
Schultz, T. W. 1993. The economic value of education. New York: Columbia University Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Scott, R. S. 1996. Foundation of a field of Inquiry. American Educational Research Association. 66, N0 3, pp. 341-359.
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066003341
Citazione non strutturata
Wernerfelt, B. A. 1984. A Resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207