Vedi metadata
Cite as
-
Titolo completo
RIVISTA DI PSICOLOGIA CLINICA
-
Editore
FrancoAngeli
-
ISSN
1828-9363 (Rivista Online)
-
Numero del fascicolo
1
-
Designazione del fascicolo
1
-
Data del fascicolo
2024
-
Titolo completo
Three approaches to overcome compartmentalization: A brief epistemological analysis
-
Di (autore)
-
Prima Pagina
103
-
Ultima Pagina
119
-
Lingua del testo
Inglese
-
Data di publicazione
2024/10
-
Copyright
2024 FrancoAngeli srl
Descrizione principale
The authors of the target article (Salvatore et al., 2022) provided an in-depth analysis of the features and the causes of professional psychology's fragmentation, generally referred to as compartmentalization. The present contribution is a critical reflection on the three approaches aimed at overcoming it. In conclusion, some preliminary remarks are presented regarding the primary components that a theory of practice should encompass.
Elenco citazioni del
10.3280/rpc1-2024oa17127
Citazione non strutturata
Bennett, M. R. & Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Blackwell.
Citazione non strutturata
Blackburn, S. (2005). The Oxford dictionary of philosophy. Second edition revised. Oxford University Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Brinkmann, S. (2002). Minds, brains, or persons? What is psychology about? In B. D. Slife, S. C. Yanchar & F. C. Richardson
(eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Theoretical and Philosophi-cal Psychology (pp. 13-29), Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003036517-3
Citazione non strutturata
Brock A. C. (2015). The history of psychological objects. In J. Martin, J. Sugarman & K. L. Slaney (eds.), The Wiley Handbook
of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology: Methods, Approaches, and New Directions for Social Sciences. First edition (pp.
151-165), John Wiley & Sons.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118748213.ch10
Citazione non strutturata
Danziger K. (1990). Constructing the subject. Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511524059
Citazione non strutturata
Danziger K. (1997). Naming the mind. How psychology found its language. Sage.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221815
Citazione non strutturata
Danziger K. (2008). Marking the mind: A history of memory. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810626
Citazione non strutturata
Dupré J. (1993). The disorder of things. Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science. Harvard University Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Fletcher G. (1995). The scientific credibility of folk psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Citazione non strutturata
Feser E. (2005). Philosophy of mind. A beginner’s guide. Oneworld Publications.
Citazione non strutturata
Gaj N. (2016). Unity and fragmentation in psychology. The philosophical and methodological roots of the discipline. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315652573
Citazione non strutturata
Hacking I. (1995). Rewriting the soul: Multiple personality and the science of memory. Princeton University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400821686
Citazione non strutturata
Hacking I. (1999). The social construction of what? Harvard University Press.
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1bzfp1z
Citazione non strutturata
Lamiell J. T. (2010). Wiliam Stern (1871-1938): A brief introduction to his life and works. Pabst Science Publishers.
Citazione non strutturata
Martin J., Sugarman J., Thompson J. (2003). Psychology and the ques-tion of agency. State University of New York Press.
https://doi.org/10.1353/book4669
Citazione non strutturata
Nagel E. (1961). The structure of science. Problems of logic of scientific explanation. Hackett.
https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1937571
Citazione non strutturata
Nelson H. G., Stolterman E. (2014). The design way. Intentional change in an unpredictable world. Second edition. MIT Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Von Wright G. H. (1971). Explanation and understanding. Cornell University Press.