Vedi metadata

Dati del DOI

10.3280/ess2-2021oa12485

Articolo

Cite as

Dati della rivista
Dati del fascicolo
Dati dell'articolo
Elenco citazioni del 10.3280/ess2-2021oa12485

Citazione non strutturata

Ahmad M.K., Adnan A.H.M., Azamri N.M., Idris K.B., Norafand N.N. and Ishak N.I. (2019, February). Education 4.0 technologies for English language teaching and learning in the Malaysian context. In Proceedings of the International Invention, Innovative & Creative (InIIC) Conference, Series (6-16).


Citazione non strutturata

Airenti G. (2015). The cognitive bases of anthropomorphism: from relatedness to empathy. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(1): 117-127.


Citazione non strutturata

Belpaeme T., Kennedy J., Ramachandran A., Scassellati B., & Tanaka F. (2018). Social robots for education: A review. Science robotics, 3(21): eaat5954.


Citazione non strutturata

Benitti F.B.V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 58: 978-988.


Citazione non strutturata

Brown J.S., Collins A. and Duguid P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational researcher, 18(1): 32-42.


Citazione non strutturata

Carless D. (2019). Feedback loops and the longer-term: towards feedback spirals. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5): 705-714.


Citazione non strutturata

Damiano L., Dumouchel P. and Lehmann H. (2015). Towards human-robot affective co-evolution overcoming oppositions in constructing emotions and empathy. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(1): 7-18.


Citazione non strutturata

Damiano L. and Dumouchel P. (2018), Anthropomorphism in human–robot co-evolution. Frontiers in psychology, 9: 468.


Citazione non strutturata

Gorostiza J.F., Barber R., Khamis A.M., Malfaz M., Pacheco R., Rivas R. and Salichs M.A. (2006). Multimodal human-robot interaction framework for a personal robot. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2006. ROMAN 2006. The 15th IEEE International Symposium on (39-44). IEEE.


Citazione non strutturata

Han J. and Kim D. (2009). r-Learning services for elementary school students with a teaching assistant robot. In Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on (255-256). IEEE.


Citazione non strutturata

Hattie J. and Clarke S. (2018). Visible Learning: Feedback. Routledge.


Citazione non strutturata

Ishiguro H., Ono T., Imai M., Maeda T., Kanda T. and Nakatsu R. (2001). Robovie: an interactive humanoid robot. Industrial robot: An international journal, 28(6): 498-504.


Citazione non strutturata

Kanda T., Hirano T., Eaton D. and Ishiguro H. (2004). Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(1-2): 61-84.


Citazione non strutturata

Laurillard D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.


Citazione non strutturata

Laurillard D. (2013). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. Routledge.


Citazione non strutturata

Lehmann H. & Rossi P.G. (2018). Enactive Robot Assisted Didactics (ERAD): The Role of the Maker Movement. In Educational Robotics in the Context of the Maker Movement. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer.


Citazione non strutturata

Lehmann H. & Rossi P.G. (2020a). Robot sociali come mediatori educativi in classe. SISTEMI INTELLIGENTI, 1: 167-179.


Citazione non strutturata

Lehmann H. & Rossi P.G. (2020b). Social robots in educational contexts: Developing an application in enactive didactics. Journal of e-Learning and knowledge Society, 15(2).


Citazione non strutturata

Lehmann H. (2020). Social Robots for Enactive Didactics. p. 1-128, Milano: FrancoAngeli.


Citazione non strutturata

Maturana H.R. and Varela F.J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. New Science Library/Shambhala Publications.


Citazione non strutturata

Nicol D. (2018). Unlocking generative feedback through peer reviewing. In: V. Grion V. and Serbati A. (Eds.). Assessment of learning or assessment for learning? Towards a culture of sustainable assessment in higher education (47-59). Lecce: Pensa Multimedia.


Citazione non strutturata

Rossi P.G. (2011). Didattica enattiva. Complessità, teorie dell’azione, professionalità docente. Milano: FrancoAngeli.


Citazione non strutturata

Rossi P.G., Pentucci M., Fedeli L., Giannandrea L. and Pennazio V. (2018). From the informative feedback to the generative feedback. Education Sciences & Society, 9(2): 83-107.


Citazione non strutturata

Senft E., Lemaignan S., Bartlett M., Baxter P. and Belpaeme T. (2018). Robots in the classroom: Learning to be a Good Tutor.


Citazione non strutturata

Shamsuddin S., Ismail L.I., Yussof H., Zahari N.I., Bahari S., Hashim H. and Jaffar A. (2011). Humanoid robot NAO: Review of control and motion exploration. In Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE), 2011 IEEE International Conference on (511-516).


Citazione non strutturata

Softbank Robotics (2018). Retrieved 12.12.2018 from https://www.softbankrobotics.com/emea/en/pepper.


Citazione non strutturata

Varela F., Thompson E. and Rosch E. (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.


Citazione non strutturata

Vogt P., De Haas M., De Jong C., Baxter P. and Krahmer E. (2017). Child-robot interactions for second language tutoring to preschool children. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 11(73).


Citazione non strutturata

Vygotsky L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes.