Vedi metadata
I METADATI DI QUESTO DOI SONO STATI AGGIORNATI IL: 2024-01-10 23:12
Cite as
-
Titolo completo
EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY
-
Editore
FrancoAngeli
-
ISSN
2038-9442 (Rivista Stampata)
2284-015X (Rivista Online)
-
Numero del fascicolo
1
-
Designazione del fascicolo
1
-
Data del fascicolo
2023
-
Titolo completo
A possible dialogue between Accessibility and Assessment in university context. Considerations from a case study
-
Di (autore)
-
Prima Pagina
379
-
Ultima Pagina
388
-
Lingua del testo
Inglese
-
Data di publicazione
2023/07
-
Copyright
2023 FrancoAngeli srl
Descrizione principale
The subject of this paper is Assessment in university contexts and aims to establish a possible dialogue between the assessment of student learning and Accessibility. The aim is to offer a reflection starting from a case study, which has tried to examine the assessment processes from the point of view of cultures (the values and meanings associated with the process), of policies (the strategic and organizational choices) and practices (tools, procedures used). The new element is represented by the specific lens that has been chosen to adopt in reading the results of the research: that of accessibility. In university contexts it becomes important to give value to a construct like this, which arises from the philosophy of Universal Design, and which reveals opportunities for rethinking and improvement starting from questions such as: is it possible to think of an assessment process that promotes accessibility for everyone? How to design a universal assessment process? The research tools used in the study are the analysis of documents (60 documents), questionnaires (156 teachers and 380 students) and Focus Groups (16 students).
Elenco citazioni del
10.3280/ess1-2023oa15275
Citazione non strutturata
Ahn R. and Class M. (2011). Student-Centered Pedagogy: Co-Construction of Knowledge through Student-Generated Midterm Exams. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(2): 269-281.
Citazione non strutturata
ANVUR (2018). Rapporto biennale sullo stato del sistema universitario e della ricerca 2018. ANVUR, Roma.
Citazione non strutturata
Attard A., Di Iorio E., Geven K., and Santa R. (2010). Student-Centred Learning: Toolkit for Students, Staff and Higher Education Institutions. European Students’ Union (NJ1).
Citazione non strutturata
Austin A. (2003). Creating a bridge to the future: Preparing new faculty to face changing expectations in a shifting context.
Review of Higher Education, 26(2): 119-144.
https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2002.0031
Citazione non strutturata
Black P. and Wiliam D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice,
5(1): 7-74.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Citazione non strutturata
Black P. and Wiliam D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability,
21(1): 5-31.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Citazione non strutturata
Carless D. (2013). Sustainable feedback and the development of student self- evaluative capacities. In S. Merry, M. Price, D. Carless and M. Taras (Eds.), Reconceptualising feedback in higher education: Developing dialogue with students (pp. 113-122). Abingdon: Routledge.
Citazione non strutturata
CAST (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2 [Institutional]. The UDL Guidelines. Retrieved April 12, 2021 from https://udlguidelines.cast.org/?utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=none&ut%20m_source=cast-about-%20udl.
Citazione non strutturata
Denzin N.K. and Lincoln Y.S. (2005). Handbook of qualitative research. 3 ed. Thousand Oaks, CA.
Citazione non strutturata
Li L. and Guo R. (2015). A Student-Centered Guest Lecturing: A Constructivism Approach to Promote Student Engagement. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, v15.
Citazione non strutturata
Mazzara B.M. (2002). Metodi qualitativi in psicologia sociale. Prospettive teoriche e strumenti operativi. Roma: Carocci.
Citazione non strutturata
Meyer A., Rose D., and Gordon D. (2014). Universal Design for Learning: Theory and Practice. CAST. Retrieved April 12, 2021 from http://udltheorypractice.cast.org/login.
Citazione non strutturata
Sambell, K. (2013). Engaging students through assessment. In: E. Dunne and D. Owen (Eds.), The student engagement handbook: practice in higher education (pp. 379-396). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Citazione non strutturata
Sambell K. (2016). Assessment and feedback in higher education: considerable room for improvement?. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 1(1).
Citazione non strutturata
Stake R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Citazione non strutturata
Zimmerman, B.J. (2002). Becoming a Self- Regulated Learner. Theory into Practice, 21(2): 64-70.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Citazione non strutturata
Zhu E., and Kaplan M. (2006). Technology and teaching. In: W.J. McKeachie (Ed.), Teaching tips: Strategies, research and theory for college and university teachers (12th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.