Vedi metadata
Cite as
-
Titolo completo
EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY
-
Editore
FrancoAngeli
-
ISSN
2038-9442 (Rivista Stampata)
2284-015X (Rivista Online)
-
Numero del fascicolo
1
-
Designazione del fascicolo
1
-
Data del fascicolo
2023
-
Titolo completo
Developing feedback literacy in initial teacher education: Results from an investigation
-
Di (autore)
-
Prima Pagina
152
-
Ultima Pagina
164
-
Lingua del testo
Inglese
-
Data di publicazione
2023/07
-
Copyright
2023 FrancoAngeli srl
Descrizione principale
This survey, which involved 258 students of the Primary Education Sciences degree course at the University of Molise, intends to examine the effects of feedback literacy activities in supporting student learning. With this purpose, a qualitative analysis of the reflective narratives contained in the e-portfolios produced by the students during the lessons was conducted. The results demonstrate a particular utility of peer feedback activities in increasing forms of self-assessment and autonomous review of the work performed.
Elenco citazioni del
10.3280/ess1-2023oa15189
Citazione non strutturata
Brown G. T. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Implications for policy and professional development. Assessment
in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(3): 301-318.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000304609
Citazione non strutturata
Carless D. (2013). Trust and Its Role in Facilitating Dialogic Feedback. In: Boud D. and Molloy E., editors, Feedback in Higher and Professional Education: Understanding It and Doing It Well. London: Routledge.
Citazione non strutturata
Carless D. (2015). Excellence in University Assessment: Learning from Award-Winning Practice. London: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740621
Citazione non strutturata
Grion V., Serbati A. (2019). Valutazione sostenibile e feedback nei contesti universitari: prospettive emergenti, ricerche e pratiche. Lecce: Pensa multimedia.
Citazione non strutturata
Grion V., Serbati A., Cecchinato G. (2022). Dal voto alla valutazione per l'apprendimento. Strumenti e teconologie per la scuola secondaria. Roma: Carocci.
Citazione non strutturata
Hattie J. (2009). Visible Learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achivement. London: Routledge.
Citazione non strutturata
Hattie J., Clarke S. (2018). Visible learning: feedback. New York: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429485480
Citazione non strutturata
Laurillard D. (2012). Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. New York: Routledge.
Citazione non strutturata
Nicol D. (2018). Unlocking generative feedback via peer reviewing. In: Grion V. and Serbati A., editors, Assessment of Learning or Assessment for Learning? Towards a culture of sustainable assessment in HE. Lecce-Brescia: Pensa Multimedia.
Citazione non strutturata
Nicol D., Serbati A., Tracchi M. (2019). Competence Development and Portfolios: Promoting Reflection through Peer Review. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 11(2): 1-13.
Citazione non strutturata
Pintrich P. R., Zusho A. (2002). Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom. In: Smart J.C. and
Tierney W.G., editors, Higher education: Handbook of theory and research. Dordrecht: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0245-5_2
Citazione non strutturata
Pontecorvo C. (1985). Discutere per ragionare: la costruzione della conoscenza come argomentazione. Rassegna di Psicologia, 2(1): 23-45.
Citazione non strutturata
Romano A. (2018). Transformative learning: A review of the assessment tools. Journal of Transformative Learning, 5(1): 53-70.
Citazione non strutturata
Rossi P. G., Giannandrea L. (2006). Che cos’è l’e-portfolio. Roma: Carocci.
Citazione non strutturata
Winstone N., Carless D. (2019). Designing effective feedback processes in higher education: A learning-focused approach. London
& New York: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351115940