Vedi metadata
I METADATI DI QUESTO DOI SONO STATI AGGIORNATI IL: 2024-01-10 23:04
Cite as
-
Titolo completo
WELFARE E ERGONOMIA
-
Editore
FrancoAngeli
-
ISSN
2421-3691 (Rivista Stampata)
2531-9817 (Rivista Online)
-
Numero del fascicolo
1
-
Designazione del fascicolo
1
-
Data del fascicolo (YYYY/MM)
2020/02
-
Titolo completo
Interdisciplinarity in academic research? Evidences from competitive project funding
-
Di (autore)
-
Prima Pagina
79
-
Ultima Pagina
93
-
Lingua del testo
Inglese
-
Data di publicazione
2020/02
-
Copyright
2019 FrancoAngeli srl
Introduzione o prefazione
The paper investigates the characteristics of researchers with interdisciplinary research ori-entation with respect to those more disciplinary oriented. The research question is: how aca-demic researchers dealing with interdisciplinary research perceive the quality of the projects developed, the stability of the collaborations of the research teams, and the importance of in-terdisciplinarity in the assessment of the projects submitted for funding, comparing with those dealing with disciplinary research? Because motivations and reputation of academics are not based on interdisciplinarity, we expect that researchers do not perceive any specific ad-vantage/disadvantage of interdisciplinarity.
Elenco citazioni del
10.3280/WE2019-001008
Citazione non strutturata
Boix Mansilla V., Feller I. and Gardner H. (2006). Quality assessment in interdisciplinary research evalaution. Research Evaluation,
15: 69-74.
https://doi.org/10.3152/147154406781776057
Citazione non strutturata
Bonaccorsi A. (2008). Search regimes and the industrial dynamics of science. Minerva, 46: 285-315.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-008-9101-3
Citazione non strutturata
Carayol N. and Thi T.U. (2005). Why do academic scientists engage in interdisciplinary research? Research Evaluation, 70-79.
https://doi.org/10.3152/147154405781776355
Citazione non strutturata
Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P. and Trow M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: Sage.
Citazione non strutturata
Katz J.S. and Martin B. (1997). What is research collaboration. Research Policy, 26: 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
Citazione non strutturata
Klein J. (2008). Evaluation of interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinary research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine,
116-123.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.010
Citazione non strutturata
Langfeld L. (2006). The policy challenges of peer review: managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessment.
Research Evaluation, 31- 41.
https://doi.org/10.3152/147154406781776039
Citazione non strutturata
Laudel G. (2006). Conclave in the Tower of Babel: how peers review interdisciplinary research proposals. Research Evaluation,
15: 57-6.
https://doi.org/10.3152/147154406781776048
Citazione non strutturata
Ribeiro F.M. (2016). Interdisciplinarity in ferment: the role of knowledge networks and department affiliation. Technological
Forecasting and Social Change, 113(B): 240-247.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.021
Citazione non strutturata
Sanz-Menendez L., Zulueta García M.Á. and Bordons M. (2001). Interdisciplinarity as a multidimensional concept: measures in
three different areas. Research Evaluation, 47-58.
https://doi.org/10.3152/147154401781777123
Citazione non strutturata
van Raan T. (2000). Practising Interdisciplinarity. Canada: University of Toronto Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Wooley R., Sánchez-Barrioluengo M., Turpin T. and Marceau J. (2015). Research collaborations in the social sciences: What
factors are associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary collaborations? Science and Public Policy, 42(4).
https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu074
Citazione non strutturata
Zinilli A. (2016). Competitive project funding and dynamic complex networks: evidence from Projects of National Interest (PRIN).
Scientometrics, 108: 633-652.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1976-4