Vedi metadata
Cite as
-
Titolo completo
STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI
-
Editore
FrancoAngeli
-
ISSN
0391-8769 (Rivista Stampata)
1972-4969 (Rivista Online)
-
Numero del fascicolo
2
-
Designazione del fascicolo
2
-
Data del fascicolo
2024
-
Titolo completo
‘Digital shadow' or ‘digital twin'? Evidence on digital approaches, working condition and organisational changes from two I4.0 lean production manufacturing
-
Di (autore)
-
Prima Pagina
11
-
Ultima Pagina
38
-
Lingua del testo
Inglese
-
Data di publicazione
2025/05
-
Copyright
2024 FrancoAngeli srl
Descrizione principale
The debate on digitalisation and changes in manufacturing has focused on the digital ‘twin/digital shadow' dichotomy, two approaches to digital technology implementation. At the same time, the literature has paid great attention to the integration between the Industry 4.0 paradigm and lean production as well as to the different outcomes of such integration in terms of ‘augmented lean', ‘distorted lean' and ‘lean trap'. This paper analyses the approaches to digitalisation adopted by two German-owned manufacturing firms in Northern Italy that have implemented lean production, focusing on the factors behind this adoption and the potential consequences on working conditions and organisation. The two companies are leaders in their respective sectors (sports cars and high-tech air conditioners), are inspired by lean principles and adhere to the I4.0 paradigm, to which the literature tends to refer the digital twin approach; however, the results show that in both cases a digital shadow approach predominates, even if the factors underlying this choice appear to be different. The research highlights how the implementation of a ‘digital shadow' approach, while reducing the risks of technology substitution of jobs, can have critical implications on working conditions and, above all, can lead to a ‘lean trap' by limiting the innovation potential of new technologies, while jeopardising the sustainability of lean itself.
Elenco citazioni del
10.3280/SO2024-002002
Citazione non strutturata
Anadu E., Harding A. (2000), Risk Perception and Bottled Water Use, in «Journal AWWA» 92, (11), pp. 82–92.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.2000.tb09051.x
Citazione non strutturata
Antonelli M., Greco F. (2013), L’acqua che mangiamo. Cos’è l’acqua virtuale e come la consumiamo, Edizioni Ambiente, Milano.
Citazione non strutturata
Baldino N., Sauri D. (2018), Characterizing the Recent Decline of Water Consumption in Italian Cities, in «Investigaciones
Geográficas» 69, pp. 9-21.
https://doi.org/10.14198/INGEO2018.69.01
Citazione non strutturata
Beck, U. (1986), Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne, Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main; trad. it (2000) La società del rischio. Verso una seconda modernità, Carocci, Roma.
Citazione non strutturata
Bettini L. (2015), L’acqua intelligente. Una gestione sostenibile ed economica è possibile, Edizioni Ambiente, Milano.
Citazione non strutturata
Brouwer S., Hofman-Caris R., van Aalderen N. (2020), Trust in Drinking Water Quality: Understanding the Role of Risk Perception
and Transparency, in «Water» 12, (9), 2608.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092608
Citazione non strutturata
Brouwer S., Pieron M., Sjerps R., Etty T. (2019), Perspectives Beyond the Meter: A Q-study for Modern Segmentation of Drinking
Water Customers, in «Water Policy» 21, (6), pp. 1224–1238.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2019.078
Citazione non strutturata
Ceccarini L. (2008), Consumare con impegno, Laterza, Roma-Bari.
Citazione non strutturata
Doria M.F. (2006), Bottled Water versus Tap Water: Understanding Consumers’ Preferences, in «Journal of Water and Health»
4, (2), pp. 271-276.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2006.0023
Citazione non strutturata
Douglas M. (1973), Natural Symbols, Random House, London.
Citazione non strutturata
Douglas M. (1966), Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concept of Pollution and Taboo, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London; trad. it. (2014) Purezza e pericolo. Un’analisi dei concetti di contaminazione e tabù, il Mulino, Bologna.
Citazione non strutturata
Forno F., Graziano P.R. (2016), Il consumo critico. Una relazione solidale tra chi acquista e chi produce, il Mulino, Bologna.
Citazione non strutturata
Giddens A. (1990), The Consequences of Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge; trad. it. (1994) Le conseguenze della modernità, il Mulino, Bologna.
Citazione non strutturata
Grondin J., Levallois P., Moret S. & Gingras S. (1996), The Influence of Demographics, Risk Perception, Knowledge, and Organoleptics on Water Consumption Patterns, in «Atti della conferenza annuale di AWWA» Denver, pp. 537-546.
Citazione non strutturata
Kopytoff I. (1986), The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process, in Appadurai A. (a cura di), The social
life of things. Commodities in cultural perspective, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 64-91.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819582.004
Citazione non strutturata
Latour B. (1991), Nous n’avons jamais été modernes, Paris, La Découverte; trad. it. (1995) Non siamo mai stati moderni. Saggio di antropologia simmetrica, Eleuthera, Milano.
Citazione non strutturata
Legambiente (2018), Acque in bottiglia 2018. Un’anomalia tutta italiana, 31 marzo [online] www.legambiente.it/wp-content/uploads/dossier-acque_in_bottiglia_2018.pdf [consultato il 17 maggio 2024].
Citazione non strutturata
Leonini L., Sassatelli R. (a cura di) (2008), Il consumo critico, Laterza, Roma-Bari.
Citazione non strutturata
Levallois P., Grondin J., Gingras S. (1999), Evaluation of Consumer Attitudes on Taste and Tap water Alternatives, in «Quebec
Water Sciences and Technology» 40, (6), pp. 135-139.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1999.0282
Citazione non strutturata
Luhmann N. (1979), Trust and Power, John Wiley, New York.
Citazione non strutturata
Oncini F., Forno F. (2021), Testing the Waters: A Sociological Analysis of Domestic Water Use and Consumption, in P. Turrini,
A. Massarutto, M. Pertile, A. de Carli (eds.), Water Law, Policy and Economics in Italy. Between National Autonomy and EU
Law Constraints, Cham Switzerland, Springer, pp. 81-103.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69075-5_4
Citazione non strutturata
Rayner S. (1993), Risk Perception, Technology Acceptance, and Institutional Culture: Case Studies of some New Definitions, in B. Rück (ed.) Risk Is a Construct: Perceptions of Risk Perception, Knesebeck, Munich, 1993, pp. 197-220.
Citazione non strutturata
Salvatore A., Sassatelli R. (2004), Trust and Food. A Theoretical Discussion, in Consumer Trust in Food. A European Study of the Social and Institutional Conditions for the Production of Trust, The TRUSTINFOOD project (2002-2004).
Citazione non strutturata
Schatzki T., Knorr Cetina K., Von Savigny E. (2001), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, London, Routledge.
Citazione non strutturata
Shove E., Pantzar M., Watson M. (2012), The Dynamics of Social Practices: Everyday Life and How It Changes, Sage, London.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250655
Citazione non strutturata
Slovic P. (1993), Perceived Risk, Trust, and Democracy, in «Risk Analysis» 13, (6), pp. 675–682.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01329.x
Citazione non strutturata
Wilk R. (2002), Consumption, Human Needs, and Global Environmental Change, in «Global Environmental Change» 12, (1), pp. 5-13.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00028-0