I METADATI DI QUESTO DOI SONO STATI AGGIORNATI IL: 2024-01-10 22:56
Titolo completo
PARADIGMI
Editore
FrancoAngeli
ISSN
1120-3404 (Rivista Stampata)
2035-357X (Rivista Online)
Numero del fascicolo
3
Designazione del fascicolo
3
Data del fascicolo (YYYY/MM)
2016/01
Titolo completo
The status of the simulative method in cognitive science: current debates and future prospects
Di (autore)
Prima Pagina
47
Ultima Pagina
66
Lingua del testo
Inglese
Data di publicazione
2016/01
Copyright
2015 FrancoAngeli srl
Introduzione o prefazione
In questo lavoro sarà esaminato lo status attuale dell'approccio simulativo nelle scienze cognitive e nelle neuroscienze. Attraverso esempi specifici, discuteremo come idee, teorie e previsioni derivanti dalla ricerca sui sistemi artificiali abbiano contribuito significativamente al progresso scientifico nelle scienze cognitive e delle neuroscienze, spesso lavorando in sinergia con la ricerca empirica e teorica. Inoltre, l'approccio simulativo è oggi presente in un numero crescente di conferenze interdisciplinari ed eventi, e sta influenzando politiche di finanziamento dell'UE e degli USA. Gli esempi qui menzionati suggeriscono che il metodo simulativo è più efficace quando inserito in un contesto interdisciplinare, quando offre una base normativa / meccanicistica per generare predizioni empiriche e quando fornisce un quadro unitario di fenomeni tradizionalmente studiati separatamente. Nonostante i numerosi "success cases" qui menzionati, comunque, lo status epistemologico dell'approccio simulativo - e specialmente della robotica - è ancora oggetto di discussione, ed il suo impatto non ancora pienamente realizzato.
Citazione non strutturata
Anderson J.R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Arbib M.A. (1992). Schema theory. In: Shapiro S., ed. Encyclopedia of artificial intelligence. 2nd Edition. New York: Wiley: 1427-1443.
Citazione non strutturata
Arbib M.A. (2003). The handbook of brain theory and neural networks. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Arkin R.C. (1998). Behavior-based robotics. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Asada M., Hosoda K., Kuniyoshi Y., Ishiguro H., Inui T., Yoshikawa Y., Ogino M. and Yoshida C. (2009). Cognitive developmental
robotics: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 1, 1: 12-34.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TAMD.2009.2021702
Citazione non strutturata
Barsalou L.W. (1999). Perceptual symbol system. Behavioral and Brain Science, 22: 577-600.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149
Citazione non strutturata
Barsalou L.W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59: 617-645.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
Citazione non strutturata
Bayer H.M. and Glimcher P.W. (2005). Midbrain dopamine neurons encode a quantitative reward prediction error signal. Neuron,
47: 129-141.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.05.020
Citazione non strutturata
Beer R.D. (1997). The dynamics of adaptive behavior: A research program. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 20: 257-289.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(96)00063-2
Citazione non strutturata
Brooks R.A. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47: 139-159.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(91)90053-M
Citazione non strutturata
Cisek P. (2007). Cortical mechanisms of action selection: the affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions
of Royal Society B, 362: 1585-1599.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2054
Citazione non strutturata
Cisek P. and Kalaska J.F. (2005). Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: specification of multiple
direction choices and final selection of action. Neuron, 45: 801-814.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.01.027
Citazione non strutturata
Clark A. (1998). Being there. putting brain, body, and world together. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Clark A. (1999). An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Science, 3: 345-351.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01361-3
Citazione non strutturata
Clark A. and Grush R. (1999). Towards a cognitive robotics. Adaptive Behavior, 7: 5-16.
https://doi.org/10.1177/105971239900700101
Citazione non strutturata
Cordeschi R. (2002). The discovery of the artificial: behavior, mind and machines before and beyond cybernetics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9870-5
Citazione non strutturata
Cordeschi R. (2004). Cybernetics. In: Floridi L., ed. The Blackwell guide to philosophy of computing and information. Oxford:
Blackwell: 186-196.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757017.ch14
Citazione non strutturata
Cordeschi R. (2006) Simulation models of organism behavior: some lessons from precybernetic and cybernetic approaches. In:
Termini S., ed. Imagination and rigor: essays on Eduardo R. Caianiello’s scientific heritage. Berlin-Milan: Springer: 39-46.
https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0472-1_4
Citazione non strutturata
Cordeschi R. (2008). Steps toward the synthetic method: symbolic information processing and self-organization systems in early
artificial intelligence. In: Husbands P., Holland O. and Wheeler M., eds. The mechanical mind in history. Cambridge (MA):
MIT Press: 219-258.
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262083775.003.0010
Citazione non strutturata
Datteri E. and Tamburrini G. (2007). Biorobotic experiments for the discovery of biological mechanisms. Philosophy of Science,
74, 3: 409-430.
https://doi.org/10.1086/522095
Citazione non strutturata
Daw N.D., Gershman S.J., Seymour B., Dayan P. and Dolan R.J., (2011). Model-based influences on humans’ choices and striatal
prediction errors. Neuron, 69: 1204-1215.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.027
Citazione non strutturata
Demiris Y. and Khadhouri B. (2005). Hierarchical attentive multiple models for execution and recognition. Robotics and Autonomous
Systems, 54: 361-369.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2006.02.003
Citazione non strutturata
Dindo H., Zambuto D. and Pezzulo G. (2011). Motor simulation via coupled internal models using sequential Monte Carlo. Proceedings of IJCAI: 2113-2119.
Citazione non strutturata
Doya K., Ishii S., Pouget A. and Rao R.P.N., eds. (2007). Bayesian brain: probabilistic approaches to neural coding. Cambrigde (MA): MIT Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Fiorillo C.D., Newsome W.T. and Schultz W. (2008). The temporal precision of reward prediction in dopamine neurons. Nature
Neuroscience, 11: 966-973.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2159
Citazione non strutturata
Frackowiak R. (2014). Eyes on the prize. New Scientist, 223: 28-29.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(14)61395-6
Citazione non strutturata
Glenberg A. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20: 1-55.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X97000010
Citazione non strutturata
Griffiths T.L., Chater N., Kemp C., Perfors A. and Tenenbaum J.B. (2010). Probabilistic models of cognition: exploring representations
and inductive biases. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14: 357-364.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.004
Citazione non strutturata
Grossberg S. (1978). A theory of human memory: self-organization and performance of sensory-motor codes, maps, and plans.
In: Rosen R. and Snell F., eds. Progress in theoretical biology. New York: Academic Press: 233-374.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-543105-7.50013-0
Citazione non strutturata
Gurney K.N., Prescott T.J. and Redgrave P. (2001). A computational model of action selection in the basal ganglia in a new
functional anatomy. Biological Cybernetics, 84: 401-410.
https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00007984
Citazione non strutturata
Harnad S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42: 335-346.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(90)90087-6
Citazione non strutturata
Hoffmann H. (2007). Perception through visuomotor anticipation in a mobile robot. Neural Networks, 20: 22-33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2006.07.003
Citazione non strutturata
Jeannerod M. (2006). Motor cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198569657.001.0001
Citazione non strutturata
Ljungberg T., Apicella, P. and Schultz W. (1992). Responses of monkey dopamine neurons during learning of behavioral reactions. Journal of Neurophysiology, 67, 1: 145-163.
Citazione non strutturata
Lungarella M., Metta G., Pfeifer R. and Sandini G. (2003). Developmental robotics: a survey. Connection Science, 15: 151-190.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540090310001655110
Citazione non strutturata
Marcos E., Pani P., Brunamonti E., Deco G., Ferraina S. and Verschure P. (2013). Neural variability in premotor cortex is
modulated by trial history and predicts behavioral performance. Neuron, 78: 249-255.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.02.006
Citazione non strutturata
Markram H. (2012). The Human Brain Project. Scientific Amenican, 306: 50-55.
https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0612-50
Citazione non strutturata
Marr D. (1982). Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York: Henry Holt and Co.
Citazione non strutturata
McCarthy J., Minsky M., Rochester N. and Shannon C. (1955). A proposal for the Darmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence. Available at: http://www.formal. stanford.edu/jmc/his- tory/dartmouth/dartmouth.html.
Citazione non strutturata
McClelland J.L., McNaughton B.L. and O’Reilly R.C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus
and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review,
102: 419-457.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.419
Citazione non strutturata
McClelland J.L., Botvinick M.M., Noelle D.C., Plaut D.C., Rogers T.T., Seidenberg M.S. and Smith L.B. (2010). Letting structure
emerge: connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to cognition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14: 348-356.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.002
Citazione non strutturata
Metta G., Sandini G., Natale L. and Panerai F. (2001). Development and robotics. Proceedings of IEEE-RAS: 33-42.
Citazione non strutturata
Mirolli M., Santucci V.G. and Baldassarre G. (2013). Phasic dopamine as a prediction error of intrinsic and extrinsic reinforcements
driving both action acquisition and reward maximization: a simulated robotic study. Neural Networks, 39: 40-51.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2012.12.012
Citazione non strutturata
Newell A., Shaw J.C. and Simon H.A. (1958). Elements of a theory of human problem solving. Psychological Review, 65, 3: 151-166.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048495
Citazione non strutturata
Newell A. and Simon H.A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall.
Citazione non strutturata
Nolfi S. (2009). Behavior and cognition as a complex adaptive system: Insights from robotic experiments. In: Hooker C., ed. Handbook of the philosophy of science. Vol 10: Philosophy of complex systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Citazione non strutturata
O’Regan J.K. and Noe A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
24: 883-917.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01000115
Citazione non strutturata
O’Reilly R.C. and Munakata Y. (2000). Computational explorations in cognitive neuroscience: understanding the mind by simulating the brain. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Oudeyer P.Y., Kaplan F. and Hafner V. (2007). Intrinsic motivation systems for autonomous mental development. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary
Computation, 11, 2: 265-286.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2006.890271
Citazione non strutturata
Pezzulo G. (2011). Grounding procedural and declarative knowledge in sensorimotor anticipation. Mind and Language, 26: 78-114.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01411.x
Citazione non strutturata
Pezzulo G., Barsalou L.W, Cangelosi A., Fischer M.H., McRae K. and Spivey M. (2011). The mechanics of embodiment: a dialogue
on embodiment and computational modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 2: 1-21.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00005
Citazione non strutturata
Pezzulo G. and Castelfranchi C. (2009). Thinking as the control of imagination: a conceptual framework for goal-directed systems.
Psychological Research, 73: 559-577.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-009-0237-z
Citazione non strutturata
Pfeifer R. and Bongard J.C. (2006). How the body shapes the way we think. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Pfeifer R., Lungarella M. and Iida F. (2007). Self-organization, embodiment, and biologically inspired robotics. Science,
318: 1088-1093.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1145803
Citazione non strutturata
Ratcliff R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85: 59-108.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.2.59
Citazione non strutturata
Redgrave P., Prescott T.J. and Gurney K. (1999). The basal ganglia: a vertebrate solution to the selection problem? Neuroscience,
89: 1009-1023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4522(98)00319-4
Citazione non strutturata
Rolf M., Steil J.J. and Gienger M. (2010). Goal babbling permits direct learning of inverse kinematics. IEEE Transactions
on Autonomous Mental Development, 2, 3: 216-229.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TAMD.2010.2062511
Citazione non strutturata
Romo R. and Schultz W. (1990). Dopamine neurons of the monkey midbrain: contingencies of responses to active touch during self-initiated arm movements. Journal of Neurophysiology, 63, 3: 592-606.
Citazione non strutturata
Rosenbloom P.S., Laird J.E. and Newell A. (1992). The Soar papers: research on integrated intelligence. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Rumelhart D.E., McClelland J.L. and the P.R Group. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Ryan R.M. and Deci E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary
Educational Psychology, 25, 1: 54-67.
https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Citazione non strutturata
Sandamirskaya Y., Zibner S.K., Schneegans S. and Schöner G. (2013). Using dynamic field theory to extend the embodiment stance
toward higher cognition. New Ideas Psychology, 31: 322-339.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.01.002
Citazione non strutturata
Santucci V.G., Baldassarre G. and Mirolli M. (2014). Autonomous selection of the “what” and the “how” of learning: an intrinsically motivated system tested with a two armed robot. Proceedings of ICDL-Epirob, IEEE International Conferences: 434-439.
Citazione non strutturata
Schoener G. (2008). Dynamical systems approaches to cognition. In: Spencer P., Thomas M.S. and McClelland J.L., eds. Toward
a unified theory of development: connectionism and dynamic systems theory re-considered. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816772.007
Citazione non strutturata
Schultz W. (1998). Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80, 1: 1-27.
Citazione non strutturata
Schultz W., Apicella P. and Ljungberg T. (1993). Responses of monkey dopamine neurons to reward and conditioned stimuli during successive steps of learning a delayed response task. Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 3: 900-913.
Citazione non strutturata
Schultz W., Dayan P. and Montague P.R. (1997). A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science, 275: 1593-1599.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5306.1593
Citazione non strutturata
Shadlen M.N., Kiani R., Hanks T.D. and Churchland A.K. (2008). Neurobiology of decision making: sn intentional framework. In: Engel C. and Singer W., eds., Better than conscious? Decision making, the human mind, and implications for institutions. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press: 72-101.
Citazione non strutturata
Simon H.A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Spivey M. (2007). The continuity of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Steels L. (2003). Intelligence with representation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical,
Physical and Engineering Sciences, 361: 2381-2395.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2003.1257
Citazione non strutturata
Sutton, R.S. and Barto A.G. (1998). Reinforcement learning: an introduction. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Tenenbaum J.B., Griffiths T.L. and Kemp C. (2006). Theory-based bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning. Trends
in Cognitive Science, 10: 309-318.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.009
Citazione non strutturata
Thelen E. and Smith L.B. (1996). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Thelen E., Schöner G., Scheier C. and Smith L. (2001). The dynamics of embodiment: a field theory of infant perseverative
reaching. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24: 1-33.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01003910
Citazione non strutturata
Thompson E. and Varela F.J. (2001). Radical embodiment: neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5:
418-425.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01750-2
Citazione non strutturata
Usher M. and McClelland J.L. (2001). On the time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological
Review, 108, 3: 550-592.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.550
Citazione non strutturata
Von Hofsten C. (2004). An action perspective on motor development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 6: 266-272.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.04.002
Citazione non strutturata
Webb B. (2000). What does robotics offer animal behaviour? Animal Behavior, 60: 545-558.
https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1514
Citazione non strutturata
Weng J. (2004). Developmental robotics: theory and experiments. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 1, 2: 199-236.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219843604000149
Citazione non strutturata
White R. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66: 297-333.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040934
Citazione non strutturata
Wiener N. (1950). The human use of human beings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Citazione non strutturata
Wolpert D.M. and Ghahramani Z. (2000). Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 3: 1212-1217.
https://doi.org/10.1038/81497