Titolo completo
CADMO
Editore
FrancoAngeli
ISSN
1122-5165 (Rivista Stampata)
1972-5019 (Rivista Online)
Numero del fascicolo
2
Designazione del fascicolo
2
Data del fascicolo
2023
Titolo completo
Mechanisms underlying effects of formative assessment on student achievement: A proposed framework to ignite future research
Di (autore)
Prima Pagina
9
Ultima Pagina
20
Lingua del testo
Inglese
Data di publicazione
2024/01
Copyright
2023 FrancoAngeli srl
Descrizione principale
Research has shown that formative assessment can have large positive effects on student achievement, but the effects vary substantially and are not always positive. In addition, the underlying mechanisms responsible for the learning effects are not well understood. We present a framework developed to support research efforts to identify these mechanisms. The framework includes formative assessment processes as well as students' learning processes, defines and exemplifies the term mechanisms in relevant contexts, indicates possible mechanisms, and identifies aspects that require further research to characterise and explain the mechanisms through which formative assessment affects student achievement. Finally, we exemplify how the framework may be used to design studies capable of providing the robust evidence required for drawing conclusions about the mechanisms.
Citazione non strutturata
Baird, J., Hopfenbeck, T., Newton, P., Stobart, G., Steen-Utheim, A. (2014), State of the Field Review: Assessment and Learning. Report for the Norwegian Knowledge Centre for Education, Case Number 13/4697, -- available at http://forskning-sradet.no.
Citazione non strutturata
Bandura, A. (1977), “Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral
https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.84.2.191
Citazione non strutturata
Change”, Psychological Review, 84 (2), pp. 191-215.
Citazione non strutturata
Bennett, R. (2011), “Formative Assessment: A Critical Review”, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18,
pp. 5-25.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
Citazione non strutturata
Boesen, J., Helenius, O., Bergqvist, E., Bergqvist, T., Lithner, J., Palm, T., Palmberg,
Citazione non strutturata
B. (2014), “Developing Mathematical Competence: From the Intended to the
Citazione non strutturata
Enacted Curriculu ”, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, pp. 72-87.
Citazione non strutturata
Dindyal, J., Schack, E.O., Choy, B.H., Sherin, M.G. (2021), “Exploring the Terrains of
Citazione non strutturata
Mathematics Teacher Noticing”, ZDM-Mathematics Education, 53 (1), pp. 1-16.
Citazione non strutturata
Double, K.S., McGrane, J.A., Hopfenbeck, T.N. (2020), “The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-Analysis
of Control Group Studies”, Educational Psychology Review, 32, pp. 481-509.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3
Citazione non strutturata
Ellis, A., Özgür, Z., Reiten, L. (2018), “Teacher Moves for Supporting Student Reasoning”, Mathematics Education Research
Journal, 31 (2), pp. 107-132.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0246-6
Citazione non strutturata
Gu, P.Y. (2021), “An Argument-Based Framework for Validating Formative Assessment in the Classroom”, Frontiers in Education,
6, 605999.
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.605999
Citazione non strutturata
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Granier, H., Bogard Givvin, K., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., Miu-Ying Chui, A., Wearne, D.,
Smith, M., Kersting, N., Manaster, A., Tseng, E., Etterbeek, W., Manaster, C., Gonzales, P., Stigler, J. (2003), Teaching
Mathematics in Seven Countries: Results from the Timss 1999 Video Study. Washington, DC: DIaNe Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1037/e610352011-003
Citazione non strutturata
Hofverberg, A., Winberg, M., Palmberg, B., Andersson, C., Palm, T. (2022), “Relationships between Basic Psychological Need
Satisfaction, Regulations, and Behavioral Engagement in Mathematics”, Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 829958. Jonsson, B., Norqvist,
M., Liljekvist, Y., Lithner, J. (2014), “Learning Mathematics through Algorithmic and Creative Reasoning”, The Journal of
Mathematical Behavior, 36 (36), pp. 20-32.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.829958
Citazione non strutturata
Leighton, J. P. (2019), “Students’ Interpretation of Formative Assessment Feedback: Three Claims for Why We Know So Little
About Something So Important”, Journal of Educational Measurement, 56 (4), pp. 793-814.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12237
Citazione non strutturata
Lithner, J. (2008), “A Research Framework for Creative and Imitative Reasoning”, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67 (3),
pp. 255-276.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9104-2
Citazione non strutturata
Lui, A.M., Andrade, H.L. (2022), “The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback
Processing”, Frontiers in Education, 7, 751548.
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.751548
Citazione non strutturata
Mouratidis, A., Lens, W., Vansteenkiste, M. (2010), “How You Provide Corrective Feedback Makes a Difference: The Motivating
Role of Communicating in an Autonomy-Supporting Way”, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32 (5), pp. 619-637.
https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.32.5.619
Citazione non strutturata
Palm, T., Andersson, C., Boström, E., Vingsle, C. (2017), “A Review of the Impact of Formative Assessment on Student Achievement in Mathematics”, Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 22 (3), pp. 25-50.
Citazione non strutturata
Sanchez, C.E., Atkinson, K.M., Koenka, A.C., Moshontz, H., Cooper, H. (2017), “Self-Grading and Peer-Grading for Formative
and Summative Assessments in 3rd through 12th Grade Classrooms: A Meta-Analysis”, Journal of Educational Psychology, 109 (8),
pp. 1049-1066.
https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000190
Citazione non strutturata
Shaughnessy, M., DeFino, R., Pfaff, E., Blunk, M. (2020), “I Think I Made a Mistake: How Do Prospective Teachers Elicit the
Thinking of a Student Who Has Made a Mistake?”, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24 (4), pp. 335-359.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-020-09461-5
Citazione non strutturata
Star, J.R., Verschaffel, L. (2016), Providing Support for Student Learning: Recommendations from Cognitive Science for the Teaching of Mathematics. In J. Cai, Compendium for Research in Mathematics Education, Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc., pp. 292-307.
Citazione non strutturata
Stillesjö, S., Karlsson Wirebring, L., Andersson, M., Granberg, C., Lithner, J., Jonsson, B., Nyberg, L., Wiklund-Hörnqvist,
C. (2021), “Active Math and Grammar Learning Engages Overlapping Brain Networks”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
– PNAS, 118 (46), pp. 1-3.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2106520118
Citazione non strutturata
Van der Kleij, F.M., Lipnevich, A.A. (2021), “Student Perceptions of Assessment Feedback: A Critical Scoping Review and Call
for Research”, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 33 (2), pp. 345-373.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09331-x
Citazione non strutturata
Weiner, B. (2000), “Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Theories of Motivation from an Attributional Perspective”, Educational
Psychology Review, 92 (4), pp. 548-573. Winberg, M., Palm, T. (2021), “Antecedents and Relative Importance of Student Motivation
for Science and Mathematics Achievement in Timss”, Frontiers in Education, 6, 575926.
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.575926
Citazione non strutturata
Winstone, N.E., Nash, R.A., Parker, M., Rowntree, J. (2017), “Supporting Learners’ Agentic Engagement with Feedback: A Systematic
Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes”, Educational Psychologist, 52 (1), pp. 17-37.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538
Citazione non strutturata
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., Hattie, J. (2020), “The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research”,
Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087
Citazione non strutturata
Yeh, S. S. (2009), “Class Size Reduction or Rapid Formative Assessment?: A Comparison of CostEffectiveness”, Educational Research
Review, 4 (1), pp. 7-15.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.09.001