Titolo completo (Arabo)
الرشاقة المعرفية وعلاقتها بالتفكير التدبري لدى طلبة معاهد الفنون الجميلة
Sottotitolo
الرشاقة المعرفية، التفكير التدبري، طلبة معاهد الفنون الجميلة
Editore
alftih
ISSN
1996-8752 (Rivista Stampata)
1996-8752 (Rivista Online)
Numero del volume
29
Numero del fascicolo
2
Data del fascicolo (YYYY/MM/DD)
2025/06/02
Titolo completo (Arabo)
الرشاقة المعرفية وعلاقتها بالتفكير التدبري لدى طلبة معاهد الفنون الجميلة
Sottotitolo
الرشاقة المعرفية، التفكير التدبري، طلبة معاهد الفنون الجميلة
Di (autore)
Affiliazione
المديرية العامة لتربية ديالى, Dr
Numero di Pagine
85
Prima Pagina
460
Ultima Pagina
485
Lingua del testo
Arabo
Data di publicazione
2025/06/02
Copyright
1997 College of Basic Education
Descrizione principale (Inglese)
This research aims to explore the level of cognitive agility and Agentic thinking among students at Fine Arts Institutes, examine the correlation between these two variables, and identify gender differences (male-female) in both variables. To achieve these objectives, the researcher adopted Kazem's (2024) Cognitive Agility Scale and constructed an Agentic Thinking Scale based on Snyder's (2002) model and its dimensions: perseverance and persistence, goal-directed determination, and self-talk endorsement for thinking. The psychometric properties of the scales, including face validity, reliability, and construct validity (for the Agentic Thinking Scale), were verified. The Agentic Thinking Scale, in its final form, consisted of 36 items. The scales were applied to a sample of 200 students, selected randomly and equally from the Fine Arts Institute in Diyala. Statistical analyses using the t-test for one and two independent samples and Pearson's correlation coefficient revealed that students at Fine Arts Institutes exhibit a high level of cognitive agility and Agentic thinking. Additionally, significant gender differences were found in cognitive agility favoring males and in Agentic thinking favoring females. The results also showed a positive correlation between cognitive agility and Agentic thinking.