Anzeige des vollständigen DOI-Metadaten-Sets
Cite as
-
Vollständiger Titel
RIVISTA DI PSICOLOGIA CLINICA
-
Verlag
FrancoAngeli
-
ISSN
1828-9363 (Online-Zeitschrift)
-
Nummer der Ausgabe
1
-
Andere Beschreibung der Ausgabe
1
-
Erscheinungsdatum der Ausgabe
2024
-
Vollständiger Titel
Three approaches to overcome compartmentalization: A brief epistemological analysis
-
Von (Autor)
-
Erste Seite
103
-
Letzte Seite
119
-
Sprache des Textes
Englisch
-
Erscheinungsdatum
2024/10
-
Copyright
2024 FrancoAngeli srl
Abstract/Hauptbeschreibung
The authors of the target article (Salvatore et al., 2022) provided an in-depth analysis of the features and the causes of professional psychology's fragmentation, generally referred to as compartmentalization. The present contribution is a critical reflection on the three approaches aimed at overcoming it. In conclusion, some preliminary remarks are presented regarding the primary components that a theory of practice should encompass.
Zitierungen des
10.3280/rpc1-2024oa17127
Unstructured Zitierung
Bennett, M. R. & Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Blackwell.
Unstructured Zitierung
Blackburn, S. (2005). The Oxford dictionary of philosophy. Second edition revised. Oxford University Press.
Unstructured Zitierung
Brinkmann, S. (2002). Minds, brains, or persons? What is psychology about? In B. D. Slife, S. C. Yanchar & F. C. Richardson
(eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Theoretical and Philosophi-cal Psychology (pp. 13-29), Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003036517-3
Unstructured Zitierung
Brock A. C. (2015). The history of psychological objects. In J. Martin, J. Sugarman & K. L. Slaney (eds.), The Wiley Handbook
of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology: Methods, Approaches, and New Directions for Social Sciences. First edition (pp.
151-165), John Wiley & Sons.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118748213.ch10
Unstructured Zitierung
Danziger K. (1990). Constructing the subject. Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511524059
Unstructured Zitierung
Danziger K. (1997). Naming the mind. How psychology found its language. Sage.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221815
Unstructured Zitierung
Danziger K. (2008). Marking the mind: A history of memory. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810626
Unstructured Zitierung
Dupré J. (1993). The disorder of things. Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science. Harvard University Press.
Unstructured Zitierung
Fletcher G. (1995). The scientific credibility of folk psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Unstructured Zitierung
Feser E. (2005). Philosophy of mind. A beginner’s guide. Oneworld Publications.
Unstructured Zitierung
Gaj N. (2016). Unity and fragmentation in psychology. The philosophical and methodological roots of the discipline. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315652573
Unstructured Zitierung
Hacking I. (1995). Rewriting the soul: Multiple personality and the science of memory. Princeton University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400821686
Unstructured Zitierung
Hacking I. (1999). The social construction of what? Harvard University Press.
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1bzfp1z
Unstructured Zitierung
Lamiell J. T. (2010). Wiliam Stern (1871-1938): A brief introduction to his life and works. Pabst Science Publishers.
Unstructured Zitierung
Martin J., Sugarman J., Thompson J. (2003). Psychology and the ques-tion of agency. State University of New York Press.
https://doi.org/10.1353/book4669
Unstructured Zitierung
Nagel E. (1961). The structure of science. Problems of logic of scientific explanation. Hackett.
https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1937571
Unstructured Zitierung
Nelson H. G., Stolterman E. (2014). The design way. Intentional change in an unpredictable world. Second edition. MIT Press.
Unstructured Zitierung
Von Wright G. H. (1971). Explanation and understanding. Cornell University Press.