Vollständiger Titel
EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY
Verlag
FrancoAngeli
ISSN
2038-9442 (Gedruckte Zeitschrift)
2284-015X (Online-Zeitschrift)
Nummer der Ausgabe
2
Andere Beschreibung der Ausgabe
2
Erscheinungsdatum der Ausgabe
2021
Vollständiger Titel
Using a social robot for different types of feedback during university lectures
Von (Autor)
Erste Seite
282
Letzte Seite
295
Sprache des Textes
Englisch
Erscheinungsdatum
2021/12
Copyright
2021 FrancoAngeli srl
Vorwort
In this paper we present a long-term study in which a social robot was used as an embodied feedback channel during a series of university lectures spanning over one academic year. We used a Pepper robot from Softbank Robotics within an enactive didactics framework in order to reinforce the structural coupling between the teacher, the students and the content of the lecture. The robot provided different types of feedback during the lectures. In this paper we will focus on feedback that informed the students of their learning progress and that helped the teacher to understand how the students were able to follow each lecture. At the end of the lecture series we used questionnaires as qualitative measures for how the students perceived the feedback of the robot. Our results show a positive response of the students to the robot. We asked the students also how they thought the robot's feedback affected their learning progress. The vast majority of the students reported that the robot indeed helped them to reflect about their level of understanding of the content of the lecture and facilitated the initiation of interventions to improve their learning.
Unstructured Zitierung
Ahmad M.K., Adnan A.H.M., Azamri N.M., Idris K.B., Norafand N.N. and Ishak N.I. (2019, February). Education 4.0 technologies for English language teaching and learning in the Malaysian context. In Proceedings of the International Invention, Innovative & Creative (InIIC) Conference, Series (6-16).
Unstructured Zitierung
Airenti G. (2015). The cognitive bases of anthropomorphism: from relatedness to empathy. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(1): 117-127.
Unstructured Zitierung
Belpaeme T., Kennedy J., Ramachandran A., Scassellati B., & Tanaka F. (2018). Social robots for education: A review. Science robotics, 3(21): eaat5954.
Unstructured Zitierung
Benitti F.B.V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 58: 978-988.
Unstructured Zitierung
Brown J.S., Collins A. and Duguid P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational researcher, 18(1): 32-42.
Unstructured Zitierung
Carless D. (2019). Feedback loops and the longer-term: towards feedback spirals. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5): 705-714.
Unstructured Zitierung
Damiano L., Dumouchel P. and Lehmann H. (2015). Towards human-robot affective co-evolution overcoming oppositions in constructing emotions and empathy. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(1): 7-18.
Unstructured Zitierung
Damiano L. and Dumouchel P. (2018), Anthropomorphism in human–robot co-evolution. Frontiers in psychology, 9: 468.
Unstructured Zitierung
Gorostiza J.F., Barber R., Khamis A.M., Malfaz M., Pacheco R., Rivas R. and Salichs M.A. (2006). Multimodal human-robot interaction framework for a personal robot. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2006. ROMAN 2006. The 15th IEEE International Symposium on (39-44). IEEE.
Unstructured Zitierung
Han J. and Kim D. (2009). r-Learning services for elementary school students with a teaching assistant robot. In Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on (255-256). IEEE.
Unstructured Zitierung
Hattie J. and Clarke S. (2018). Visible Learning: Feedback. Routledge.
Unstructured Zitierung
Ishiguro H., Ono T., Imai M., Maeda T., Kanda T. and Nakatsu R. (2001). Robovie: an interactive humanoid robot. Industrial robot: An international journal, 28(6): 498-504.
Unstructured Zitierung
Kanda T., Hirano T., Eaton D. and Ishiguro H. (2004). Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(1-2): 61-84.
Unstructured Zitierung
Laurillard D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.
Unstructured Zitierung
Laurillard D. (2013). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. Routledge.
Unstructured Zitierung
Lehmann H. & Rossi P.G. (2018). Enactive Robot Assisted Didactics (ERAD): The Role of the Maker Movement. In Educational Robotics in the Context of the Maker Movement. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer.
Unstructured Zitierung
Lehmann H. & Rossi P.G. (2020a). Robot sociali come mediatori educativi in classe. SISTEMI INTELLIGENTI, 1: 167-179.
Unstructured Zitierung
Lehmann H. & Rossi P.G. (2020b). Social robots in educational contexts: Developing an application in enactive didactics. Journal of e-Learning and knowledge Society, 15(2).
Unstructured Zitierung
Lehmann H. (2020). Social Robots for Enactive Didactics. p. 1-128, Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Unstructured Zitierung
Maturana H.R. and Varela F.J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. New Science Library/Shambhala Publications.
Unstructured Zitierung
Nicol D. (2018). Unlocking generative feedback through peer reviewing. In: V. Grion V. and Serbati A. (Eds.). Assessment of learning or assessment for learning? Towards a culture of sustainable assessment in higher education (47-59). Lecce: Pensa Multimedia.
Unstructured Zitierung
Rossi P.G. (2011). Didattica enattiva. Complessità, teorie dell’azione, professionalità docente. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Unstructured Zitierung
Rossi P.G., Pentucci M., Fedeli L., Giannandrea L. and Pennazio V. (2018). From the informative feedback to the generative feedback. Education Sciences & Society, 9(2): 83-107.
Unstructured Zitierung
Senft E., Lemaignan S., Bartlett M., Baxter P. and Belpaeme T. (2018). Robots in the classroom: Learning to be a Good Tutor.
Unstructured Zitierung
Shamsuddin S., Ismail L.I., Yussof H., Zahari N.I., Bahari S., Hashim H. and Jaffar A. (2011). Humanoid robot NAO: Review of control and motion exploration. In Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE), 2011 IEEE International Conference on (511-516).
Unstructured Zitierung
Softbank Robotics (2018). Retrieved 12.12.2018 from https://www.softbankrobotics.com/emea/en/pepper.
Unstructured Zitierung
Varela F., Thompson E. and Rosch E. (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Unstructured Zitierung
Vogt P., De Haas M., De Jong C., Baxter P. and Krahmer E. (2017). Child-robot interactions for second language tutoring to preschool children. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 11(73).
Unstructured Zitierung
Vygotsky L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes.