Anzeige des vollständigen DOI-Metadaten-Sets

DOI Daten mit Auflösung

10.3280/ess2-2021oa12485

Artikel

Cite as

Daten zur Zeitschrift
Fortsetzungsausgabe
Daten Fortsetzungsartikel
Zitierungen des 10.3280/ess2-2021oa12485

Unstructured Zitierung

Ahmad M.K., Adnan A.H.M., Azamri N.M., Idris K.B., Norafand N.N. and Ishak N.I. (2019, February). Education 4.0 technologies for English language teaching and learning in the Malaysian context. In Proceedings of the International Invention, Innovative & Creative (InIIC) Conference, Series (6-16).


Unstructured Zitierung

Airenti G. (2015). The cognitive bases of anthropomorphism: from relatedness to empathy. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(1): 117-127.


Unstructured Zitierung

Belpaeme T., Kennedy J., Ramachandran A., Scassellati B., & Tanaka F. (2018). Social robots for education: A review. Science robotics, 3(21): eaat5954.


Unstructured Zitierung

Benitti F.B.V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 58: 978-988.


Unstructured Zitierung

Brown J.S., Collins A. and Duguid P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational researcher, 18(1): 32-42.


Unstructured Zitierung

Carless D. (2019). Feedback loops and the longer-term: towards feedback spirals. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5): 705-714.


Unstructured Zitierung

Damiano L., Dumouchel P. and Lehmann H. (2015). Towards human-robot affective co-evolution overcoming oppositions in constructing emotions and empathy. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(1): 7-18.


Unstructured Zitierung

Damiano L. and Dumouchel P. (2018), Anthropomorphism in human–robot co-evolution. Frontiers in psychology, 9: 468.


Unstructured Zitierung

Gorostiza J.F., Barber R., Khamis A.M., Malfaz M., Pacheco R., Rivas R. and Salichs M.A. (2006). Multimodal human-robot interaction framework for a personal robot. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2006. ROMAN 2006. The 15th IEEE International Symposium on (39-44). IEEE.


Unstructured Zitierung

Han J. and Kim D. (2009). r-Learning services for elementary school students with a teaching assistant robot. In Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on (255-256). IEEE.


Unstructured Zitierung

Hattie J. and Clarke S. (2018). Visible Learning: Feedback. Routledge.


Unstructured Zitierung

Ishiguro H., Ono T., Imai M., Maeda T., Kanda T. and Nakatsu R. (2001). Robovie: an interactive humanoid robot. Industrial robot: An international journal, 28(6): 498-504.


Unstructured Zitierung

Kanda T., Hirano T., Eaton D. and Ishiguro H. (2004). Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(1-2): 61-84.


Unstructured Zitierung

Laurillard D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.


Unstructured Zitierung

Laurillard D. (2013). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. Routledge.


Unstructured Zitierung

Lehmann H. & Rossi P.G. (2018). Enactive Robot Assisted Didactics (ERAD): The Role of the Maker Movement. In Educational Robotics in the Context of the Maker Movement. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer.


Unstructured Zitierung

Lehmann H. & Rossi P.G. (2020a). Robot sociali come mediatori educativi in classe. SISTEMI INTELLIGENTI, 1: 167-179.


Unstructured Zitierung

Lehmann H. & Rossi P.G. (2020b). Social robots in educational contexts: Developing an application in enactive didactics. Journal of e-Learning and knowledge Society, 15(2).


Unstructured Zitierung

Lehmann H. (2020). Social Robots for Enactive Didactics. p. 1-128, Milano: FrancoAngeli.


Unstructured Zitierung

Maturana H.R. and Varela F.J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. New Science Library/Shambhala Publications.


Unstructured Zitierung

Nicol D. (2018). Unlocking generative feedback through peer reviewing. In: V. Grion V. and Serbati A. (Eds.). Assessment of learning or assessment for learning? Towards a culture of sustainable assessment in higher education (47-59). Lecce: Pensa Multimedia.


Unstructured Zitierung

Rossi P.G. (2011). Didattica enattiva. Complessità, teorie dell’azione, professionalità docente. Milano: FrancoAngeli.


Unstructured Zitierung

Rossi P.G., Pentucci M., Fedeli L., Giannandrea L. and Pennazio V. (2018). From the informative feedback to the generative feedback. Education Sciences & Society, 9(2): 83-107.


Unstructured Zitierung

Senft E., Lemaignan S., Bartlett M., Baxter P. and Belpaeme T. (2018). Robots in the classroom: Learning to be a Good Tutor.


Unstructured Zitierung

Shamsuddin S., Ismail L.I., Yussof H., Zahari N.I., Bahari S., Hashim H. and Jaffar A. (2011). Humanoid robot NAO: Review of control and motion exploration. In Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE), 2011 IEEE International Conference on (511-516).


Unstructured Zitierung

Softbank Robotics (2018). Retrieved 12.12.2018 from https://www.softbankrobotics.com/emea/en/pepper.


Unstructured Zitierung

Varela F., Thompson E. and Rosch E. (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.


Unstructured Zitierung

Vogt P., De Haas M., De Jong C., Baxter P. and Krahmer E. (2017). Child-robot interactions for second language tutoring to preschool children. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 11(73).


Unstructured Zitierung

Vygotsky L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes.