Anzeige des vollständigen DOI-Metadaten-Sets
DIESE DOI-METADATEN WURDEN ZULETZT AKTUALISIERT AM: 2024-01-10 23:04
Cite as
-
Vollständiger Titel
WELFARE E ERGONOMIA
-
Verlag
FrancoAngeli
-
ISSN
2421-3691 (Gedruckte Zeitschrift)
2531-9817 (Online-Zeitschrift)
-
Nummer der Ausgabe
1
-
Andere Beschreibung der Ausgabe
1
-
Erscheinungsdatum der Ausgabe (YYYY/MM)
2020/02
-
Vollständiger Titel
Interdisciplinarity in academic research? Evidences from competitive project funding
-
Von (Autor)
-
Erste Seite
79
-
Letzte Seite
93
-
Sprache des Textes
Englisch
-
Erscheinungsdatum
2020/02
-
Copyright
2019 FrancoAngeli srl
Vorwort
The paper investigates the characteristics of researchers with interdisciplinary research ori-entation with respect to those more disciplinary oriented. The research question is: how aca-demic researchers dealing with interdisciplinary research perceive the quality of the projects developed, the stability of the collaborations of the research teams, and the importance of in-terdisciplinarity in the assessment of the projects submitted for funding, comparing with those dealing with disciplinary research? Because motivations and reputation of academics are not based on interdisciplinarity, we expect that researchers do not perceive any specific ad-vantage/disadvantage of interdisciplinarity.
Zitierungen des
10.3280/WE2019-001008
Unstructured Zitierung
Boix Mansilla V., Feller I. and Gardner H. (2006). Quality assessment in interdisciplinary research evalaution. Research Evaluation,
15: 69-74.
https://doi.org/10.3152/147154406781776057
Unstructured Zitierung
Bonaccorsi A. (2008). Search regimes and the industrial dynamics of science. Minerva, 46: 285-315.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-008-9101-3
Unstructured Zitierung
Carayol N. and Thi T.U. (2005). Why do academic scientists engage in interdisciplinary research? Research Evaluation, 70-79.
https://doi.org/10.3152/147154405781776355
Unstructured Zitierung
Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P. and Trow M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: Sage.
Unstructured Zitierung
Katz J.S. and Martin B. (1997). What is research collaboration. Research Policy, 26: 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
Unstructured Zitierung
Klein J. (2008). Evaluation of interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinary research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine,
116-123.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.010
Unstructured Zitierung
Langfeld L. (2006). The policy challenges of peer review: managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessment.
Research Evaluation, 31- 41.
https://doi.org/10.3152/147154406781776039
Unstructured Zitierung
Laudel G. (2006). Conclave in the Tower of Babel: how peers review interdisciplinary research proposals. Research Evaluation,
15: 57-6.
https://doi.org/10.3152/147154406781776048
Unstructured Zitierung
Ribeiro F.M. (2016). Interdisciplinarity in ferment: the role of knowledge networks and department affiliation. Technological
Forecasting and Social Change, 113(B): 240-247.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.021
Unstructured Zitierung
Sanz-Menendez L., Zulueta García M.Á. and Bordons M. (2001). Interdisciplinarity as a multidimensional concept: measures in
three different areas. Research Evaluation, 47-58.
https://doi.org/10.3152/147154401781777123
Unstructured Zitierung
van Raan T. (2000). Practising Interdisciplinarity. Canada: University of Toronto Press.
Unstructured Zitierung
Wooley R., Sánchez-Barrioluengo M., Turpin T. and Marceau J. (2015). Research collaborations in the social sciences: What
factors are associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary collaborations? Science and Public Policy, 42(4).
https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu074
Unstructured Zitierung
Zinilli A. (2016). Competitive project funding and dynamic complex networks: evidence from Projects of National Interest (PRIN).
Scientometrics, 108: 633-652.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1976-4