Anzeige des vollständigen DOI-Metadaten-Sets
DIESE DOI-METADATEN WURDEN ZULETZT AKTUALISIERT AM: 2026-05-12 16:52
Cite as
-
Vollständiger Titel
SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE
-
Verlag
FrancoAngeli
-
ISSN
0392-4939 (Gedruckte Zeitschrift)
1971-8403 (Online-Zeitschrift)
-
Nummer des Bandes
48
-
Nummer der Ausgabe
139
-
Andere Beschreibung der Ausgabe
139
-
Erscheinungsdatum der Ausgabe
2025
-
Vollständiger Titel
Care Building(s). Ambivalence and ambiguity in post-welfare urban austerity
-
Von (Autor)
-
Erste Seite
7
-
Letzte Seite
24
-
Sprache des Textes
Englisch
-
Erscheinungsdatum
2025/12
-
Copyright
2025 FrancoAngeli srl
Abstract/Hauptbeschreibung
This article examines the impact of urban austerity on public real estate management and citizen action. Drawing on the notions of ambivalence and ambiguity, it argues that post-welfare urban austerity produces hybrid arrangements in which citizens, associations and public institutions co-manage spaces and services. These practices simultaneously sustain neoliberal governance and generate infrastructures of care. Based on comparative research in French and Italian cities, the article argues that public buildings constitute a crucial arena in which the material, political, and moral dimensions of post-welfare urbanism are negotiated.
Zitierungen des
10.3280/SUR2025-21498
Unstructured Zitierung
Addison F. (2015). De l’aménagement du territoire au réaménagement des terrains de l’État. Politiques et projets de reconversion urbaine du domaine ferroviaire en France et en Ita-lie. PhD thesis, Politecnico di Milano and University of Paris-Est.
Unstructured Zitierung
Alam A., Houston D. (2020). Rethinking care as alternate infrastructure. Cities, 100: 102662.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102662
Unstructured Zitierung
Alimardanian M. (2024). Ontology and its double: on the nature of ambiguity and lived expe-rience. In Alimardanian M., Heffernan
T. (eds.). The anthropology of ambiguity. Manches-ter: Manchester University Press.
https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526173850.00007
Unstructured Zitierung
Artioli F. (2016). When Administrative Reforms Produce Territorial Differentiation: How Market-oriented Policies Transform
Military Brownfield Reconversion in France (1989-2012). Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(8): 1759-1775.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16642227
Unstructured Zitierung
Boltanski L., Chiapello È. (1999). Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard.
Unstructured Zitierung
Camerin F., Gastaldi F. (2018). Il ruolo dei fondi di investimento immobiliare nella riconver-sione del patrimonio immobiliare pubblico in Italia. Working papers. Urban@it, 2.
Unstructured Zitierung
Cottin-Marx S. (2019). Sociologie du monde associatif. Paris: la Découverte.
https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.cotti.2019.01
Unstructured Zitierung
Davis J. (2022). The caring city: Ethics of urban design. Bristol: Policy Press.
https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529201215.001.0001
Unstructured Zitierung
DeVerteuil J. (2016). Resilience in the post-welfare inner city. Bristol: Policy Press.
https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447316558.001.0001
Unstructured Zitierung
Dowling E. (2016). Valorised but not valued? Affective remuneration, social reproduction and femi-nist politics beyond the
crisis. British Politics, 11: 452-468.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-016-0036-2
Unstructured Zitierung
Fairbanks R.P. (2009). How it works: Recovering citizens in post-welfare Philadelphia. Chica-go: University of Chicago Press.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226234113.001.0001
Unstructured Zitierung
Fitz A., Krasny E., Wien A. (eds.). (2019). Critical care: Architecture and urbanism for a bro-ken planet. Chicago: MIT Press.
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12273.001.0001
Unstructured Zitierung
Fraser N. (2017). La fine della cura. Le contraddizioni sociali del capitalismo contemporaneo. Milano: Mimesis.
Unstructured Zitierung
Gabauer A., Knierbein S., Cohen N., Lebuhn H., Trogal K., Viderman T., Haas T. (2022). Care and the city: encounters with
urban studies. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003031536
Unstructured Zitierung
Gatta F., Montesano M.G. (2024). Experimenting with austerity urbanism through public asset management. The case of Grenoble
and Bologna. Métropoles, 35.
https://doi.org/10.4000/13et0
Unstructured Zitierung
Graeber D. (2001). Toward an anthropological theory of value: The false coin of our own dreams. New York: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780312299064
Unstructured Zitierung
Hall S.M. (2020). Social reproduction as social infrastructure. Soundings, 76: 82-94.
https://doi.org/10.3898/SOUN.76.06.2020
Unstructured Zitierung
Harvey D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. New York: Verso books.
Unstructured Zitierung
Krinsky J., Simonet M. (2017). Who Cleans the Park? Public Work and Urban Governance in New York City. Chicago: University
of Chicago Press.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226435619.001.0001
Unstructured Zitierung
Larner W. (2003). Neoliberalism?. Environment and planning D: society and space, 21(5): 509-512.
https://doi.org/10.1068/d2105ed
Unstructured Zitierung
Le Galès P., Robinson J. (2023). Introduction: Comparative global urban studies in the mak-ing: Welcome to the world of imperfect
and innovative urban comparisons. In Le Galès P., Robinson J. (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Comparative Global Urban Studies.
New York: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429287961
Unstructured Zitierung
Livi T. et al. (2023). Spazi di comunità. Ricerca valutativa sulle pratiche di riuso di spazi dismes-si a fini collettivi, Nucleo di Valutazione e Analisi per la Programmazione (NUVAP). Roma: Dipartimento per le Politiche di Coesione della Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri.
Unstructured Zitierung
McGuirk P., Dowling R. (2009). Neoliberal privatisation? Remapping the public and the pri-vate in Sydney’s masterplanned residential
estates. Political geography, 28(3): 174-185.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.05.004
Unstructured Zitierung
Nichols G., Findlay-King L., Forbes D. (2020). The Community Asset Transfer of Leisure Fa-cilities in the UK: A Review and
Research Agenda. Voluntas, 3: 1159-1172.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00263-0
Unstructured Zitierung
Oevermann H., Polyák L., Szemzö H., Mieg H.A. (eds.). (2023). Open Heritage. Community-driven adaptive reuse in Europe : best
practices. Basel: Birkhauser.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783035626827
Unstructured Zitierung
Peck J., Tickell A. (2008). Neoliberalizing space. In Martin R. (ed.). Economy. Milton Park: Routledge.
Unstructured Zitierung
Pera M., Bussu S. (2024). Towards Democratisation of Public Administration: Public-Commons Partnerships in Barcelona. International
Journal of the Commons, 18(1): 164-176.
https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1385
Unstructured Zitierung
Pestoff V.A. (2017). The Social and Political Dimensions of Co-operative Enterprises. In Michie J., Blasi J.R., Borzaga C.
(eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Mutual, Co-Operative, and Co-Owned Business. Oxford: Oxford Handbooks.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199684977.013.6
Unstructured Zitierung
Piganiol M. (2022). The Contested Commodification of State-Owned Land. French Politics, 20: 226-243.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-022-00172-2
Unstructured Zitierung
Pollitt C., Bouckaert G. (2017). Public management reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Unstructured Zitierung
Subirats J. (2016). El poder de lo próximo: las virtudes del municipalismo. Madrid: Catarata.
Unstructured Zitierung
Turnbull N. (2022). Community action in austerity: The case of Community Asset Transfer. PhD Thesis, Cardiff University.
https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12513
Unstructured Zitierung
Turnbull N. (2023). Austerity’s afterlives? The case of community asset transfer in the UK. Geographical Journal, 00: 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12513
Unstructured Zitierung
Zukin S. (1995). The cultures of the city. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.