Anzeige des vollständigen DOI-Metadaten-Sets

DOI Daten mit Auflösung

10.3280/RIV2021-079004

Artikel

Cite as

Daten zur Zeitschrift
Fortsetzungsausgabe
Daten Fortsetzungsartikel
Zitierungen des 10.3280/RIV2021-079004

Unstructured Zitierung

Bugs G., Granell C., Fonts O., Huerta J. and Painho M. (2010). An assessment of public participation GIS and Web 2.0 technologies in urban planning practice in Canela, Brazil, Cities, 27(3): 172–181.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2009.11.008


Unstructured Zitierung

Carver S., Evans A.J., Kingston R., Turton I. (2001). Public participation, GIS, and cyberdemocracy: evaluating on-line spatial decision support systems, Environment and Planning B-planning & Design, 28: 907-921.

https://doi.org/10.1068/b2751t


Unstructured Zitierung

Castells M. (1983). The City and the Grassroots: A Cross-cultural Theory of Urban Social Movements. London: Edward Arnold.


Unstructured Zitierung

Chen H. (2012). Theory-driven evaluation: Conceptual framework, application and advancement. In: Strobl R., Lobermeier O., and Heitmeyer W., eds., Evaluation von Programmen und Projekten für eine demokratische Kultur. Wiesbaden: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19009-9_2


Unstructured Zitierung

Davies R. (2018). Representing Theories of Change: A Technical Challenge with Evaluation Consequences, CEDIL Inception Paper, 15.


Unstructured Zitierung

Donolo C. (2017). Affari pubblici. Benessere individuale e felicità pubblica. Milano: FrancoAngeli.


Unstructured Zitierung

Friedmann J. (1987). Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691214009


Unstructured Zitierung

Glaser B., Strauss A. (2006). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Brunswick (U.S.A.)-London: Aldine Transaction, 1967.


Unstructured Zitierung

Ho S.Y. (1999). Evaluating urban regeneration programmes in Britain exploring the potential of the realist approach. Evaluation 5(4): 422–38.

https://doi.org/10.1177/135638999400830084


Unstructured Zitierung

Lynch K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge (MA)-London: The MIT Press.


Unstructured Zitierung

Moro G. (2016). Miti e realtà di Bari città capitale. In: Amendola G., Carrera L., Moro G., Mortellaro D. e Romano O. (2016). Sociologia di Bari. Tra sogno e realtà. Bari-Roma: Laterza.


Unstructured Zitierung

Pawson R., Tilley N. (1997). Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage Publications.


Unstructured Zitierung

Picone M. (2017). Il sostenibile ossimoro del GIS qualitativo, Semestrale di Studi e Ricerche di Geografia, 29(1): 125-136.


Unstructured Zitierung

Sidlar C.L., Rinner C. (2007). Analyzing the usability of an argumentation map as a Participatory Spatial Decision Support Tool, URISA Journal, 19(1): 47-55.


Unstructured Zitierung

Sieber R. (2006). Public Participation Geographic Information Systems: A Literature Review and Framework, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(3): 491-507.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x


Unstructured Zitierung

Van Reybrouck D. (2016). Against Elections: The Case for Democracy. London: Bodley Head.


Unstructured Zitierung

Weiss C.H. (1995). Nothing as Practical as Good Theory: Exploring Theory-Based Evaluation for Comprehensive Community Initiatives for Children and Families. In: Connell J.P., Kublsch A.C., Schorr L.B. and Weiss C.H., eds., New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives: Concepts, Methods, and Contexts. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.