DIESE DOI-METADATEN WURDEN ZULETZT AKTUALISIERT AM: 2024-01-10 23:05
Vollständiger Titel
RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA
Verlag
FrancoAngeli
ISSN
0391-6081 (Gedruckte Zeitschrift)
1972-5620 (Online-Zeitschrift)
Nummer der Ausgabe
3
Andere Beschreibung der Ausgabe
3
Erscheinungsdatum der Ausgabe (YYYY/MM)
2020/12
Vollständiger Titel
L'effetto del sovraccarico di scelta: un'indagine su bambini, adolescenti, adulti e anziani
Von (Autor)
Erste Seite
845
Letzte Seite
847
Sprache des Textes
Italienisch
Erscheinungsdatum
2020/12
Copyright
2020 FrancoAngeli srl
Vorwort
L'effetto del sovraccarico di scelta è stato finora studiato prevalentemente su adulti. L'unico studio condotto su fasce di età diverse dagli adulti ha fornito una prima dimostrazione del fatto che le conseguenze negative dell'avere troppa scelta non si estendono in egual misura a bambini, adolescenti, adulti e anziani. Il presente lavoro si propone di indagare ulteriormente le conseguenze negati-ve dell'avere troppa scelta su bambini, adolescenti e anziani. I dati suggeriscono che mentre gli adolescenti sono influenzati dal fenomeno in modo simile agli adulti, i bambini e gli anziani sembrano invece esserne immuni. Sono discusse le implicazioni teoriche e pratiche dei risultati e sono forniti spunti per ulteriori ricerche.
Unstructured Zitierung
Arrow, K. J. (1963). Social choice and individual values, 2nded. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Unstructured Zitierung
Chernev, A., Böckenholt, U., & Goodman, J. (2015). Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer
Psychology, 25, 333-358.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.002
Unstructured Zitierung
Crawford, J. D., & Stankov, L. (1996). Age differences in the realism of confidence judgments: A calibration study using tests
of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 83-103.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90027-8
Unstructured Zitierung
Coldwell, S. E., Oswald, T. K., & Reed, D. R. (2009). A marker of growth differs between adolescents with high versus low
sugar preference. Physiology & Behavior, 96, 574-580.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.12.010
Unstructured Zitierung
Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4446-9
Unstructured Zitierung
Deci, E. L. (1981). The psychology of self-determination. Lexington, MA: Heath.
Unstructured Zitierung
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Unstructured Zitierung
Fasolo, B., Carmeci, F. A., & Misuraca R. (2009). The effect of choice complexity on perception of time spent choosing: When
choice takes longer but feels shorter. Psychology & Marketing, 26, 213-228.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20270
Unstructured Zitierung
Fasolo, B., Misuraca, R., & McClelland, G. H. (2003). Individual differences in adaptive choice strategies. Research in Economics,
57, 219-233 (online).
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9443(03)00032-2
Unstructured Zitierung
Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics (2012). Older Americans 2012: Key Indicators of Well Being.
Unstructured Zitierung
Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The Affective Heuristic in Judgment of Risks and Benefits.
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1-17.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1
Unstructured Zitierung
Harker, W. J. (1979). Implications from psycholinguistics for secondary reading. Reading Horizons, 19, 217-221.
Unstructured Zitierung
Haynes, G. A. (2009). Investigating the dynamics of choice overload. Psychology and Marketing, 26, 204-212.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20269
Unstructured Zitierung
Inbar, Y., Botti, S., & Hanko, K. (2011). Decision speed and choice regret: When haste feels like waste. Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology, 47, 533-540.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.01.011
Unstructured Zitierung
Iyengar, S. S., Huberman, G., & Jiang, W. (2004). How Much Choice is Too Much? Contributions to 401(k) Retirement Plans. In
O. S. Mitchell & S. Utkus (Eds.), Pension design and structure: New lessons from behavioral finance (pp. 83-95). Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/0199273391.003.0005
Unstructured Zitierung
Iyengar, S. S., Wells, R. E., & Schwartz, B. (2006). Doing better but feeling worse-Looking for the «best» job undermines
satisfaction. Psychological Science, 17, 143-150.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01677.x
Unstructured Zitierung
Luce, R. D., & Suppes, P. (1965). Preference, utility, and subjective probability. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, (Vol. III, pp.252-410). New York: Wiley.
Unstructured Zitierung
Markopoulos, P., Read J. C., MacFarlane, S. J., & Höysniemi J. (2008). Evaluating interactive products with and for children. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Unstructured Zitierung
Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2005). Aging and motivated cognition: The positivity effect in attention and memory. Trends
in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 496-502.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.005
Unstructured Zitierung
Misuraca, R. (2013). Troppa scelta ha veramente conseguenze negative? Una rassegna di studi empirici” (Do too many choices have negative consequences? An empirical review.). Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 35(1), 129 -153.
Unstructured Zitierung
Misuraca, R., Ceresia, F., Teuscher, U., & Faraci, P. (2019). The role of the brand on choice overload. Mind and Society,
18, 57-76.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-019-00210-7
Unstructured Zitierung
Misuraca, R., Faraci, P., Gangemi, A., Carmeci, F. A., & Miceli, S. (2015). The Decision Making Tendency Inventory: A new
measure to assess maximizing, satisficing, and minimizing. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 111-116.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.043
Unstructured Zitierung
Misuraca, R. & Fasolo, B. (2018). Maximizing versus satisficing in the digital age: Disjoint scales and the case for “construct
consensus”. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 152-160.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.031
Unstructured Zitierung
Misuraca, R., Miceli, S., & Teuscher, U. (2017). Three effective ways to nurture our brain: Phsysical activity, healthy nutrition,
and music. A review. European Psychologist, 22, 101-120.
https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000284
Unstructured Zitierung
Misuraca, R., Reutskaja, E., Fasolo, B., & Iyengar, S. S. (2020). How much choice is “good enough”? Moderators of information
and choice overload. In R. Viale (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Bounded Rationality. Abingdon: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315658353-51
Unstructured Zitierung
Misuraca, R., & Teuscher, U. (2013). Time flies when you maximize. Maximizers and satisficers perceive time differently when
making decisions. Acta Psychologica, 143(2), 176-180.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.03.004
Unstructured Zitierung
Misuraca, R., Teuscher, U., & Carmeci, F. A. (2016). Who are maximizers? Future oriented and highly numerate individuals.
International Journal of Psychology, 51(4), 307-311.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12169
Unstructured Zitierung
Peters, E., Hess, T. H., Västfjäll, D., & Auman, C. (2007). Adult age differences in dual information processes: Implications
for the role of affective and deliberative processes in older adults’ decision making. Perspectives on Psychological Science,
2, 1-23.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00025.x
Unstructured Zitierung
Reutskaja, E., & Hogarth, R. M. (2009). Satisfaction in choice as a function of the number of alternatives: When goods satiate.
Psychology and Marketing, 26, 197-203.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20268
Unstructured Zitierung
Reutskaja, E., Iyengar, S. S., Fasolo, B., & Misuraca, R. (2020). Cognitive and affective consequences of information and
choice overload. In R. Viale (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Bounded Rationality. Abingdon: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315658353-49
Unstructured Zitierung
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external locus of control of reinforcement. Psychological
Monographs, 80, 1-28.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976
Unstructured Zitierung
Salthouse, T. A. (2006). Mental exercise and mental aging: Evaluating the validity of the ‘‘use it or lose it’’ hypothesis.
Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 68-87.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00005.x
Unstructured Zitierung
Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.
Unstructured Zitierung
Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R., & Todd, P. M. (2009). What moderates the too-much-choice effect? Psychology & Marketing,
26, 229-253.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20271
Unstructured Zitierung
Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York: Harper Collins.
Unstructured Zitierung
Shah, A., & Wolford, G. (2007). Buying behavior as a function of parametric variation of number of choice. Psychological Science,
18, 369-370.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01906.x
Unstructured Zitierung
United Nations Population Division, DESA (2009).World Population Ageing 2009. New York: United Nations publication.
Unstructured Zitierung
Walter, J. M., & Soliah, L. A. (1995). Sweetener preference among non-institutionalized older adults. Journal of Nutrition
for the Elderly, 14, 1-13.
https://doi.org/10.1300/J052v14n02_01
Unstructured Zitierung
Wewers, M. E., & Lowe, N.K. (1990). A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena.
Research in Nursing and Health 13, 227-236.
https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770130405