DIESE DOI-METADATEN WURDEN ZULETZT AKTUALISIERT AM: 2024-01-10 22:51
Vollständiger Titel
PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA'
Verlag
FrancoAngeli
ISSN
1827-5249 (Gedruckte Zeitschrift)
1971-842X (Online-Zeitschrift)
Nummer der Ausgabe
2
Andere Beschreibung der Ausgabe
2
Erscheinungsdatum der Ausgabe (YYYY/MM)
2013/03
Vollständiger Titel
Genere, ideologia e mass media: i differenti predittori del sessismo ambivalente
Von (Autor)
Erste Seite
119
Letzte Seite
128
Sprache des Textes
Italienisch
Erscheinungsdatum
2013/03
Copyright
2012 FrancoAngeli srl
Vorwort
La Teoria del Sessismo Ambivalente, sviluppata da Glick e Fiske (1996; 2011), prevede che nei confronti di ciascun genere coesistano atteggiamenti di natura apertamente ostile con atteggiamenti apparentemente benevoli, seppur anch'essi sessisti. Questa teoria postula quindi l'esistenza di quattro sessismi: benevolo (BS) e ostile (HS) verso le donne, benevolo (BM) e ostile (HM) verso gli uomini. La presente ricerca si inserisce nell'ambito degli studi che indagano quali fattori incidono maggiormente sui diversi atteggiamenti sessisti. I dati sono stati raccolti tramite questionario su un campione bilanciato per genere (N = 253), con l'obiettivo di comparare il peso di variabili di differente natura testando quattro modelli di regressione. Il genere dei rispondenti e le variabili ideologiche sono risultati predittori di HS, BM e HM; il consumo televisivo influenza entrambi gli atteggiamenti benevoli (BS, BM), mentre l'utilizzo di Internet influenza HS.
Unstructured Zitierung
Bargh J.A., McKenna K.Y.A. (2004). The internet and social life. Annual Review
of Psychology, 55: 573-590
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141922
Unstructured Zitierung
Barreto M., Ellemers N. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35: 633-642.
Unstructured Zitierung
Christopher A.N., Mull M.S. (2006). Conservative ideology and ambivalent sexism.
Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30: 223-230
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00284.x
Unstructured Zitierung
De Piccoli N., Rollero C. (2010). Differenze e diseguaglianze di genere tra Nord e Sud d’Italia. Attualità di uno stereotipo. Psicologia di Comunità, VI: 65-74.
Unstructured Zitierung
Di Stefano G., Roccato M. (2005). Una banca di item per misurare l’orientamento alla dominanza sociale in Italia. TPM, 12: 5-20.
Unstructured Zitierung
Gelli B. (2009). Psicologia della differenza di genere. Milano: Franco Angeli
Unstructured Zitierung
Glick P., Fiske S.T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating
hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ,
70, 491-512
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
Unstructured Zitierung
Glick P., Fiske S.T. (1999). The Ambivalence toward Men Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23 (3): 519-536.
Unstructured Zitierung
Glick P., Fiske S.T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance. Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56: 109-118
Unstructured Zitierung
Glick P., Fiske S.T. (2011). Ambivalent Sexism Revisited. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35: 530-535.
Unstructured Zitierung
Glick P., Fiske S.T., Mladinic A., Saiz J.L., Abrams D., Masser B. et al. (2000).
Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across
cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79: 763-775
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763
Unstructured Zitierung
Glick P., Lameiras M., Fiske S.T., Eckes T., Masser B., Volpato C. et al. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86: 713-728.
Unstructured Zitierung
Glick P., Lameiras M., Rodríguez Castro Y. (2002). Education and Catholic religiosity
as predictors of hostile and benevolent sexism toward women and men.
Sex Roles, 47: 433-441
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021696209949
Unstructured Zitierung
Holzner S. (2009). Facebook marketing: Leverage social media to grow your business. Albany, NY: SUNY press.
Unstructured Zitierung
Jost J.T., Kay A.C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary
gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse form of system justification.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88: 498-509
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498
Unstructured Zitierung
Kian E.M., Clavio G., Vincent J., Shaw S.D. (2011). Homophobic and sexist yet
uncontested: Examining football fan postings on Internet message boards.
Journal of Homosexuality, 58 (5): 680-699
https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2011.563672
Unstructured Zitierung
Managanelli Rattazzi A.M., Volpato C., Canova L. (2008). L’atteggiamento ambivalente verso donne e uomini. Un contributo alla validazione delle scale ASI e AMI. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 35: 261-287
Unstructured Zitierung
Mazzara B. (2008). I discorsi dei media e la psicologia sociale. Roma: Carocci
Unstructured Zitierung
Moya M., Glick P., Expósito F., de Lemus S., Hart J. (2007). It’s for your own good: Benevolent sexism and women’s reactions to protectively justified restrictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33: 1421-1434
Unstructured Zitierung
Nowatski J., Morry M.M. (2009). Women’s intentions regarding, and acceptance
of, self-sexualizing behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33: 95-107
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.01477.x
Unstructured Zitierung
Plakoyiannaki E., Mathioudaki K., Dimitratos P., Zotos Y. (2008). Images of
Women in Online Advertisements of Global Products: Does Sexism Exist?.
Journal of Business Ethics, 83: 101-112
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9651-6
Unstructured Zitierung
Riva G. (2004). Psicologia dei nuovi media. Bologna: Il Mulino
Unstructured Zitierung
Rollero C., Fedi A. (2012). Ambivalent attitudes toward women and men: Recognizability of stereotypes and effects on self-perception. Psicología Politica, 44: 69-86
Unstructured Zitierung
Sakalli N. (2002). Beliefs about wife beating among Turkish college students: The
effects of patriarchy, sexism, and sex differences. Sex Roles, 44: 599-610
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012295109711
Unstructured Zitierung
Sidanius J., Pratto F. (1999), Social Dominance. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Unstructured Zitierung
Viki G.T., Abrams D. (2002). But she was unfaithful: Benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles, 47: 289-293.
Unstructured Zitierung
Wiles J.A., Wiles C.R., Tjernlund A. (1995). A Comparison of Gender Role Portrayals in Magazine Advertising: The Netherlands, Sweden and the USA. European Journal of Marketing, 29 (11): 35-49.