Anzeige des vollständigen DOI-Metadaten-Sets
Cite as
-
Vollständiger Titel
MECOSAN
-
Verlag
FrancoAngeli
-
ISSN
1121-6921 (Gedruckte Zeitschrift)
2384-8804 (Online-Zeitschrift)
-
Nummer der Ausgabe
118
-
Andere Beschreibung der Ausgabe
118
-
Erscheinungsdatum der Ausgabe
2021
-
Vollständiger Titel
Un Servizio Nazionale per gli Anziani Non Autosufficienti
-
Von (Autor)
-
Erste Seite
155
-
Letzte Seite
173
-
Sprache des Textes
Italienisch
-
Erscheinungsdatum
2021/08
-
Copyright
2021 FrancoAngeli srl
Vorwort
Gli anziani non autosufficienti, ossia le persone di eta superiore o uguale a 65 anni che non sono in grado di compiere in autonomia e senza bisogno di assistenza le attivita di vita quotidiana, sono circa 2,9 milioni. Si tratta di un numero destinato a crescere fortemente nei prossimi anni. Nel PNRR il governo italiano si e impegnato ad adottare entro la primavera del 2023 "una riforma organica degli interventi destinati agli anziani non autosufficienti". Lo studio si pone l'obiettivo di contribuire al dibattito su come realizzare tale riforma, attraverso alcune stime originali e riflessioni sulle lezioni che possono essere apprese dall'esperienza di altri Paesi o dal Sistema Sanitario Nazionale. In particolare, lo studio mira a offrire quattro principali contributi: 1) stima originale della spesa pubblica e privata per gli interventi destinati agli anziani non autosufficienti, rispettivamente pari a 15,48 e 10,21 miliardi di euro; 2) stima originale del tasso di copertura del bisogno, ossia del numero degli anziani che ricevono servizi pubblici per tipologia di servizio, che e pari a circa il 52%; 3) gli elementi principali per la riforma organica degli interventi, che sarebbero: a) l'istituzione di un pilastro unico, integrato e distinto rispetto agli altri ambiti del welfare, dotato di un fondo nazionale unico, unita di accesso unificate e una politica nazionale di prevenzione; b) livelli di assistenza commisurati alle condizioni di salute; c) la promozione e la valorizzazione delle esperienze territoriali; d) orientare la spesa privata verso lo sviluppo di un settore professionale; 4) infine, e sviluppata una simulazione della spesa pubblica e del tasso di copertura del sistema proposto, mostrando come il sistema proposto possa avere un impatto positivo in termini di intensita e qualita dei livelli di assistenza.
Zitierungen des
10.3280/MESA2021-118008
Unstructured Zitierung
Albertini M., Pavolini E. (2016). Unequal Inequalities: The Stratification of the Use of Formal Care Among Older Europeans.
Journals of Gerontology: Social Science, 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv038
Unstructured Zitierung
Arlotti M., Aguilar-Hendrickson M. (2017). The vicious layering of multilevel governance in Southern Europe: The case of elderly
care in Italy and Spain. Social Policy and Administration.
https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12351
Unstructured Zitierung
Berloto S., Notarnicola E., Perobelli E., Rotolo A. (2020). Italy and the COVID-19 long-term care situation. Country report in LTCcovid.org, International Long Term Care Policy Network, CPECLSE, 30 April 2020.
Unstructured Zitierung
Brenna E., Gitto L. (2017). To What Extent Is Longterm Care Representative of Elderly Care? A Case Study of Elderly Care Financing
in Lombardy, Italy. Int J Health Policy Manag., 6(8): 467‐471. Published 2017 Aug 1.
https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.22
Unstructured Zitierung
Campbell A.L., Morgan K.J. (2005). Federalism and the politics of old-age care in Germany and the United States. Comparative
Political Studies, 38(8): 887-914.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005277575
Unstructured Zitierung
Campbell J.C., Ikegami N., Gori C. et al. (2016). How different countries allocate long-term care resources to older users:
a comparative snapshot.
https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447305057.003.0004
Unstructured Zitierung
In: Gori C., Fernandez J.L., Wittenberg R. (eds.). Long-term care reforms in OECD countries: Successes and failures, 47-76. London: Policy Press.
Unstructured Zitierung
Costa G. (2013). Long‐term care Italian policies: A case on inertial institutional change. In: Ranci C.,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4502-9_11
Unstructured Zitierung
Pavolini E. (eds.). Reforms in long‐term care policies in Europe: Investigating institutional change and social impacts, 221-241. New York, NY: Springer.
Unstructured Zitierung
De Roit B. (2010). Strategies of care. Changing elderly care in Italy and the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University
Press;
https://doi.org/10.5117/9789089642240
Unstructured Zitierung
Ferrera M. (2016). The “Southern model” of welfare in Social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1): 17-37.
https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879600600102
Unstructured Zitierung
Gabriele S., Tediosi F. (2014). Intergovernmental relations and Long Term Care reforms: lessons from the Italian case. Health
Policy, 116(1): 61-70.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.01.005
Unstructured Zitierung
Gaur S., Dumyati G., Nace D. et al. (2020). Unprecedented solutions for extraordinary times: Helping long-term care settings
deal with the Covid-19 pandemic. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1-2.
https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2020.98
Unstructured Zitierung
Gori C. (2020). Long-term Care Financing: Inserting Politics and Resource Allocation in the Debate Comment on “Financing Long-term
Care: Lessons From Japan”. Int J Health Policy Manag., 9(2): 77‐79. Published 2020 Feb 1.
https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2019.88
Unstructured Zitierung
Gori C., Barbabella F., Campbell C. et al. (2016). How different countries allocate long-term care resources to older users:
changes over time. In: Gori C., Fernandez J.L., Wittenberg R. (eds.).
https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447305057.003.0005
Unstructured Zitierung
Long-term Care Reforms in OECD Countries: Successes and Failures, 77-116. London: Policy Press.
Unstructured Zitierung
Ikegami N. (2019). Financing long-term care: lessons from Japan. Int J Health Policy Manag., 8(8): 462-466.
https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2019.35
Unstructured Zitierung
Ikegami N. (2020). Key Issues in Designing Longterm Care Systems: A Response to Recent Commentaries. International Journal
of Health Policy and Management, 9(12): 542.
https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.42
Unstructured Zitierung
ISTAT (piu anni). Demografia in Cifre: Previsioni della popolazione anni 2018-2065. -- Available at: http://demo.istat.it/previsioni2017/index.php?-lingua=ita (Accessed: May 2, 2020).
Unstructured Zitierung
Jessoula M., Pavolini E., Raitano M., Natili M. (2018). ESPN Thematic Report on Challenges in long-term care – Italy. European Commission.
Unstructured Zitierung
Longo F., Notarnicola E. (2018). Home Care for the Elderly in Sweden, Germany and Italy: A Case of Multi-Level Governance
Strategy-Making. Social Policy and Administration, 52: 1303-1316.
https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12385.
Unstructured Zitierung
Nadash P. (2020). The Evolution of Long-term Care Programs Comment on “Financing Longterm Care: Lessons From Japan”. Int J
Health Policy Manag., 9(1): 42-44. Published 2020 Jan 1.
https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2019.79
Unstructured Zitierung
Nadash P., Cuellar A.E. (2017). The emerging market for supplemental long term care insurance in Germany in the context of
the 2013 Pflege-Bahr reform. Health policy, 121(6): 588-593.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.03.006
Unstructured Zitierung
Nadash P., Doty P., von Schwanenflugel M. (2018). The German long-term care insurance program: evolution and recent developments.
The Gerontologist, 58(3): 588-597.
https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx018
Unstructured Zitierung
OECD (2020). OECD Data Population: Elderly population. -- Available at: https://data.oecd.org/pop/elderly-population.htm (Accessed: May 2, 2020).
Unstructured Zitierung
Ranci C., Pavolini E. (Eds.) (2013). Reforms in long‐term care policies in Europe: Investigating institutional change and
social impacts. New York, NY: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4502-9
Unstructured Zitierung
Ranci C., Pavolini E. (2015). Not all that Glitters is Gold: Long-Term Care reforms in the last two decades in Europe. Journal
of European Social Policy, 25(3): 270-85.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928715588704