DIESE DOI-METADATEN WURDEN ZULETZT AKTUALISIERT AM: 2024-01-10 23:02
Vollständiger Titel
ECONOMIA E SOCIETÀ REGIONALE
Verlag
FrancoAngeli
ISSN
1827-2479 (Gedruckte Zeitschrift)
2038-6745 (Online-Zeitschrift)
Nummer der Ausgabe
3
Andere Beschreibung der Ausgabe
3
Erscheinungsdatum der Ausgabe (YYYY/MM)
2018/12
Vollständiger Titel
Attività e modelli universitari di trasferimento tecnologico
Von (Autor)
Erste Seite
10
Letzte Seite
27
Sprache des Textes
Italienisch
Erscheinungsdatum
2018/12
Copyright
2018 FrancoAngeli srl
Vorwort
Le università si trovano oggi a dover perseguire la loro "terza missione", essendo chiamate a contribuire allo sviluppo economico regionale. Esse svolgono pertanto diverse attività di trasferimento tecnologico. Questo articolo ha l'obiettivo di analizzare l'adozione di tali attività nelle università tecniche europee e di identificare i possibili modelli di trasferimento tecnologico. L'analisi presentata è di tipo quantitativo. I dati sono estrapolati da un questionario redatto da una Task Force dell'associazione universitaria Cesaer. Studiando i diversi approcci che le università hanno nei confronti del trasferimento tecnologico è stato possibile identificare tre diversi modelli: uno maturo, uno incompleto, e uno in via di sviluppo con un ruolo rispettivamente centrale, secondario e quasi centrale negli ecosistemi di cui fanno parte.
Unstructured Zitierung
Alexander A.T., Martin D.P. (2013). Intermediaries for open innovation: A competence-based comparison of knowledge transfer
offices practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(1): 38-49.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.07.013
Unstructured Zitierung
Amezcua A.S., Grimes M.G., Bradley S.W., Wiklund J. (2013). Organizational sponsorship and founding environments: a contingency
view on the survival of business-incubated firms, 1994-2007. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6): 1628-1654.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0652
Unstructured Zitierung
Autio E., Kenneth M., Mustar, P., Siegel D., Wright M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research
Policy, 43(7): 1097-1108.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.015
Unstructured Zitierung
Becattini G. (1990). The Marshallian district as a socio-economic notion.
Unstructured Zitierung
In: Pyke F., Becattini G., Sengenberger W., eds. Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Cooperation in Italy. Geneva: International Institute for Labor Studies.
Unstructured Zitierung
Bradley S.R., Hayter C.S., Link A.N. (2013b). Proof of concept centers in the United States: An exploratory look. The Journal
of Technology Transfer, 38(4): 349-381.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-013-9309-8
Unstructured Zitierung
Cesaroni F., Piccaluga A. (2016). The activities of university knowledge transfer offices: towards the third mission in Italy.
The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(4): 753-777.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9401-3
Unstructured Zitierung
D’Este P., Patel P. (2007). University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions
with industry. Research Policy, 36(9): 1295-1313.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002
Unstructured Zitierung
Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university-industrygovernment
relations. Research Policy, 29(2):109-123.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Unstructured Zitierung
10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4. Etzkowitz H., Webster A., Gebhardt C., Terra B.R.C. (2000). The future of the university and
the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2): 313-330.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4
Unstructured Zitierung
Geuna A., Muscio A. (2009). The Governance of University Knowledge Transfer: A Critical Review of the Literature. Minerva,
47(1): 93-114.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9118-2
Unstructured Zitierung
Jensen R., Thursby M. (2001). Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions. American Economic Review,
91(1): 240-259.
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.1.240
Unstructured Zitierung
Kuratko D.F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory
and Practice, 29(5): 577-598.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00099.x
Unstructured Zitierung
Link A.N., Siegel D.S., Bozeman B. (2007). An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university
technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4): 641-655.
https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm020
Unstructured Zitierung
Maia C., Claro J. (2013). The role of a Proof of Concept Center in a university ecosystem: an exploratory study. The Journal
of Technology Transfer, 38(5): 641-650.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9246-y
Unstructured Zitierung
Markman G.D., Siegel D.S., Wright M. (2008). Research and technology commercialization. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8):
1401-1423.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00803.x
Unstructured Zitierung
O’Connor A. (2013). A conceptual framework for entrepreneurship education policy: Meeting government and economic purposes.
Journal of Business Venturing, 28(4): 546-563.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.07.003
Unstructured Zitierung
Perkmann M., Tartari, V., McKelvey M., Autio E., Broström A., D’Este P., Fini R. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation:
A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2): 423-442.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
Unstructured Zitierung
Porter M. (1998). On competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Unstructured Zitierung
Rauch A., Hulsink W. (2015). Putting entrepreneurship education where the intention to act lies: An investigation into the
impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial behaviour. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14(2):187-204.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0293