mEDRA - View metadata


 Deutsch      English     Italiano          


Home > Registered Users Area > Monitoring > View metadata

Serial Article

DOI data
DOI 10.7336/academicus.2022.25.14
URL http://academicus.edu.al/?subpage=volumes&nr=25
Multiple Resolution:
MR URL http://academicus.edu.al
MR URL https://academicus.edu.al/nr25/Academicus-MMXXII-25-226-234.html
MR URL https://academicus.edu.al/nr25/Academicus-MMXXII-25-226-234.pdf
MR URL mailto:info@academicus.edu.al
MR URL https://academicus.edu.al/images/front_end/academicus.jpg
MR URL https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Acess Indicators:
OA – Open Access
OA License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Journal Data

Full Title
English (eng)
Academicus International Scientific Journal
Publisher (01) Academicus International Scientific Journal
Country of publication Albania (AL)
ISSN 20793715
Product Form Printed Journal (JB)
ISSN 23091088
Product Form Online Journal (JD)

Journal Issue Data
Journal Volume Number 25
Journal Issue Date (YYYY/MM) 2022 / 01
Serial Article Data
Title
English (eng)
Locus of control and culture of poverty. An appraisal of Lawrence M. Mead’s ideas in ‘Culture and Poverty’
By (author) (A01) Seth Oppong
Affiliation University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana, Assoc.Prof.Dr.
ORCID (21) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1977-5538
Number of Pages 9
First Page 226
Last Page 234
Language of text English (eng)
Publication Date (YYYY/MM) 2022 / 01
Copyright 2022, Academicus
Abstract
Main description (01)
Lawrence M. Mead presented an interesting argument as to why poverty exists in the United States. He problematizes the culture of the poor of which ethnic minorities over-represent. By referring to the geographic regions from which these ethnic minorities came from, he globalised the question of poverty in the US. This invites a global policy debate rather than a US-centric policy debate. Indeed, Mead so freely made references to Africa and the African culture severally throughout his commentary. It is against this backdrop that I show that Mead was right to a large extent on the question of inner-driven individualised orientation. However, he overestimates its influence and misreads what culture is. He presented the culture of poverty as the antecedent of poverty. It was concluded that manipulating both internal drive (internal locus of control) and the structure of society is a more effective way to tackle poverty.

To view citations associated to the DOI 10.7336/academicus.2022.25.14 click here