mEDRA - View metadata


 Deutsch      English     Italiano          


Home > Registered Users Area > Monitoring > View metadata

Serial Article

DOI data
DOI 10.7336/academicus.2014.09.04
URL https://academicus.edu.al/?subpage=volumes&nr=9
Multiple Resolution:
MR URL https://academicus.edu.al
MR URL https://academicus.edu.al/nr9/Academicus-MMXIV-9-055-068.html
MR URL https://academicus.edu.al/nr9/Academicus-MMXIV-9-055-068.pdf
MR URL mailto:info@academicus.edu.al
MR URL https://academicus.edu.al/images/front_end/academicus.jpg
MR URL https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Acess Indicators:
OA – Open Access
OA License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Journal Data

Full Title
English (eng)
Academicus International Scientific Journal
Publisher (01) Academicus International Scientific Journal
Country of publication Albania (AL)
ISSN 20793715
Product Form Printed Journal (JB)
ISSN 23091088
Product Form Online Journal (JD)

Journal Issue Data
Journal Volume Number 9
Journal Issue Date (YYYY/MM) 2014 / 01
Serial Article Data
Title
English (eng)
Justiciability of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
By (author) (A01) Jordan Daci
Affiliation University of Tirana, Albania, Prof.As.Dr.
Number of Pages 14
First Page 55
Last Page 68
Language of text English (eng)
Publication Date (YYYY/MM) 2014 / 01
Copyright 2014, Academicus
Abstract
Main description (01)
Human Rights are natural rights that nature has given to all human beings and are inseparable, undividable and inalienable from human beings. They are vital, necessary and indispensable to a modern society, which without them would be unable to function and cannot be developed. From another perspective, “human rights are indivisible rights on individuals, based on their nature as human beings; they protect these potential attributes and holdings that are essential for a worthy life of human beings”. Human Rights in general and especially ESCR would be just illusory if they wouldn’t be justiciable. In relation to civil and political rights, it is generally taken for granted that judicial remedies for violations are essential. Regrettably, the contrary assumption is too often made in relation to ESCR. This discrepancy is not warranted either by the nature of the rights or by the relevant Covenant provisions, but is rather a result of states’ attempts to justify their failure to perform their obligations under ICESCR.

To view citations associated to the DOI 10.7336/academicus.2014.09.04 click here