View full metadata
Cite as
-
Full Title
RIVISTA DI PSICOLOGIA CLINICA
-
Publisher
FrancoAngeli
-
ISSN
1828-9363 (Online Journal)
-
Journal Issue Number
1
-
Journal Issue Designation
1
-
Journal Issue Date
2024
-
Full Title
Three approaches to overcome compartmentalization: A brief epistemological analysis
-
By (author)
-
First Page
103
-
Last Page
119
-
Language of text
English
-
Publication Date
2024/10
-
Copyright
2024 FrancoAngeli srl
Main description
The authors of the target article (Salvatore et al., 2022) provided an in-depth analysis of the features and the causes of professional psychology's fragmentation, generally referred to as compartmentalization. The present contribution is a critical reflection on the three approaches aimed at overcoming it. In conclusion, some preliminary remarks are presented regarding the primary components that a theory of practice should encompass.
Reference list of
10.3280/rpc1-2024oa17127
Unstructured Citation
Bennett, M. R. & Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Blackwell.
Unstructured Citation
Blackburn, S. (2005). The Oxford dictionary of philosophy. Second edition revised. Oxford University Press.
Unstructured Citation
Brinkmann, S. (2002). Minds, brains, or persons? What is psychology about? In B. D. Slife, S. C. Yanchar & F. C. Richardson
(eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Theoretical and Philosophi-cal Psychology (pp. 13-29), Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003036517-3
Unstructured Citation
Brock A. C. (2015). The history of psychological objects. In J. Martin, J. Sugarman & K. L. Slaney (eds.), The Wiley Handbook
of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology: Methods, Approaches, and New Directions for Social Sciences. First edition (pp.
151-165), John Wiley & Sons.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118748213.ch10
Unstructured Citation
Danziger K. (1990). Constructing the subject. Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511524059
Unstructured Citation
Danziger K. (1997). Naming the mind. How psychology found its language. Sage.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221815
Unstructured Citation
Danziger K. (2008). Marking the mind: A history of memory. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810626
Unstructured Citation
Dupré J. (1993). The disorder of things. Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science. Harvard University Press.
Unstructured Citation
Fletcher G. (1995). The scientific credibility of folk psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Unstructured Citation
Feser E. (2005). Philosophy of mind. A beginner’s guide. Oneworld Publications.
Unstructured Citation
Gaj N. (2016). Unity and fragmentation in psychology. The philosophical and methodological roots of the discipline. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315652573
Unstructured Citation
Hacking I. (1995). Rewriting the soul: Multiple personality and the science of memory. Princeton University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400821686
Unstructured Citation
Hacking I. (1999). The social construction of what? Harvard University Press.
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1bzfp1z
Unstructured Citation
Lamiell J. T. (2010). Wiliam Stern (1871-1938): A brief introduction to his life and works. Pabst Science Publishers.
Unstructured Citation
Martin J., Sugarman J., Thompson J. (2003). Psychology and the ques-tion of agency. State University of New York Press.
https://doi.org/10.1353/book4669
Unstructured Citation
Nagel E. (1961). The structure of science. Problems of logic of scientific explanation. Hackett.
https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1937571
Unstructured Citation
Nelson H. G., Stolterman E. (2014). The design way. Intentional change in an unpredictable world. Second edition. MIT Press.
Unstructured Citation
Von Wright G. H. (1971). Explanation and understanding. Cornell University Press.