View full metadata

DOI data

10.3280/ess2-2021oa12485

Serial Article

Cite as

Journal Data
Journal Issue Data
Serial Article Data
Reference list of 10.3280/ess2-2021oa12485

Unstructured Citation

Ahmad M.K., Adnan A.H.M., Azamri N.M., Idris K.B., Norafand N.N. and Ishak N.I. (2019, February). Education 4.0 technologies for English language teaching and learning in the Malaysian context. In Proceedings of the International Invention, Innovative & Creative (InIIC) Conference, Series (6-16).


Unstructured Citation

Airenti G. (2015). The cognitive bases of anthropomorphism: from relatedness to empathy. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(1): 117-127.


Unstructured Citation

Belpaeme T., Kennedy J., Ramachandran A., Scassellati B., & Tanaka F. (2018). Social robots for education: A review. Science robotics, 3(21): eaat5954.


Unstructured Citation

Benitti F.B.V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 58: 978-988.


Unstructured Citation

Brown J.S., Collins A. and Duguid P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational researcher, 18(1): 32-42.


Unstructured Citation

Carless D. (2019). Feedback loops and the longer-term: towards feedback spirals. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5): 705-714.


Unstructured Citation

Damiano L., Dumouchel P. and Lehmann H. (2015). Towards human-robot affective co-evolution overcoming oppositions in constructing emotions and empathy. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(1): 7-18.


Unstructured Citation

Damiano L. and Dumouchel P. (2018), Anthropomorphism in human–robot co-evolution. Frontiers in psychology, 9: 468.


Unstructured Citation

Gorostiza J.F., Barber R., Khamis A.M., Malfaz M., Pacheco R., Rivas R. and Salichs M.A. (2006). Multimodal human-robot interaction framework for a personal robot. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2006. ROMAN 2006. The 15th IEEE International Symposium on (39-44). IEEE.


Unstructured Citation

Han J. and Kim D. (2009). r-Learning services for elementary school students with a teaching assistant robot. In Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on (255-256). IEEE.


Unstructured Citation

Hattie J. and Clarke S. (2018). Visible Learning: Feedback. Routledge.


Unstructured Citation

Ishiguro H., Ono T., Imai M., Maeda T., Kanda T. and Nakatsu R. (2001). Robovie: an interactive humanoid robot. Industrial robot: An international journal, 28(6): 498-504.


Unstructured Citation

Kanda T., Hirano T., Eaton D. and Ishiguro H. (2004). Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(1-2): 61-84.


Unstructured Citation

Laurillard D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.


Unstructured Citation

Laurillard D. (2013). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. Routledge.


Unstructured Citation

Lehmann H. & Rossi P.G. (2018). Enactive Robot Assisted Didactics (ERAD): The Role of the Maker Movement. In Educational Robotics in the Context of the Maker Movement. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer.


Unstructured Citation

Lehmann H. & Rossi P.G. (2020a). Robot sociali come mediatori educativi in classe. SISTEMI INTELLIGENTI, 1: 167-179.


Unstructured Citation

Lehmann H. & Rossi P.G. (2020b). Social robots in educational contexts: Developing an application in enactive didactics. Journal of e-Learning and knowledge Society, 15(2).


Unstructured Citation

Lehmann H. (2020). Social Robots for Enactive Didactics. p. 1-128, Milano: FrancoAngeli.


Unstructured Citation

Maturana H.R. and Varela F.J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. New Science Library/Shambhala Publications.


Unstructured Citation

Nicol D. (2018). Unlocking generative feedback through peer reviewing. In: V. Grion V. and Serbati A. (Eds.). Assessment of learning or assessment for learning? Towards a culture of sustainable assessment in higher education (47-59). Lecce: Pensa Multimedia.


Unstructured Citation

Rossi P.G. (2011). Didattica enattiva. Complessità, teorie dell’azione, professionalità docente. Milano: FrancoAngeli.


Unstructured Citation

Rossi P.G., Pentucci M., Fedeli L., Giannandrea L. and Pennazio V. (2018). From the informative feedback to the generative feedback. Education Sciences & Society, 9(2): 83-107.


Unstructured Citation

Senft E., Lemaignan S., Bartlett M., Baxter P. and Belpaeme T. (2018). Robots in the classroom: Learning to be a Good Tutor.


Unstructured Citation

Shamsuddin S., Ismail L.I., Yussof H., Zahari N.I., Bahari S., Hashim H. and Jaffar A. (2011). Humanoid robot NAO: Review of control and motion exploration. In Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE), 2011 IEEE International Conference on (511-516).


Unstructured Citation

Softbank Robotics (2018). Retrieved 12.12.2018 from https://www.softbankrobotics.com/emea/en/pepper.


Unstructured Citation

Varela F., Thompson E. and Rosch E. (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.


Unstructured Citation

Vogt P., De Haas M., De Jong C., Baxter P. and Krahmer E. (2017). Child-robot interactions for second language tutoring to preschool children. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 11(73).


Unstructured Citation

Vygotsky L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes.