View full metadata
Cite as
-
Full Title
EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY
-
Publisher
FrancoAngeli
-
ISSN
2038-9442 (Printed Journal)
2284-015X (Online Journal)
-
Journal Issue Number
1
-
Journal Issue Designation
1
-
Journal Issue Date
2023
-
Full Title
Collaborative peer-feedback practices in hybrid learning environments
-
By (author)
-
First Page
174
-
Last Page
187
-
Language of text
English
-
Publication Date
2023/07
-
Copyright
2023 FrancoAngeli srl
Main description
The article describes a technology-mediated collaborative peer-feedback experience. 125 students took part into the activity during the delivery of a 3-months teaching in "Methodology of Action Research", within a 3-year Degree Course in Psychological, Social and Occupational Sciences. The activity was based on a 4-phases cycle of collaborative output production, structured peer-feedback, collaborative output improvement, individual reflection. The aim of the exploratory case-study here presented is to observe if and how the peer-feedback activity supported the development of collaborative, meta-cognitive and digital skills, other than knowledge acquisition. To answer our research questions, we used a mixed system, able to provide both objective data with respect to the activity carried out and the skills put in place, and subjective data related to the students' personal experience and the perceived impact on their learning. Results show a good appropriation of metacognitive skills and offer numerous hints on the design aspects which have been found to be effective in supporting students' learning.
Reference list of
10.3280/ess1-2023oa15283
Unstructured Citation
Biggs J. and Tang C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. What the student does (4th ed.). Maidenhead, UK: McGrawhill.
Unstructured Citation
Dewey J. (1961). Come pensiamo: una riformulazione del rapporto fra il pensiero riflessivo e l’educazione. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
Unstructured Citation
Ilomäki L., Lakkala M. and Kosonen K. (2013). “Mapping the Terrain of Modern Knowledge Work Competencies”. Paper presented at the 15th Biennial EARLI conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, 27-31 August 2013, Munich, Germany.
Unstructured Citation
Jonassen D. H. (2006). Modeling with technology: Mindtools for conceptual change. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Unstructured Citation
Ligorio M. B. and Sansone N. (2009). Structure of a Blended University Course: Applying Constructivist Principles to Blended
Teaching. In: Payne C. R., editor, Information Technology and Constructivism in Higher Education: Progressive Learning Frameworks
(pp. 216-230). Hershey-New York: Information Sciences Reference.
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-654-9.ch014
Unstructured Citation
Sambell K., Brown S. and Race P. (2019). Assessment as a locus for engagement: Priorities and practicalities. Italian Journal of Educational Research, XII: 45-62.
Unstructured Citation
Sansone N. (2020). “Collaborative best practices and knowledge work skills in higher education”. Keynote speech presented at the Special 15th international online conference DisCo 2020: (Online) Education in the Age of Covid-19, 22-23 June 2020, Prague, Czech Republic.
Unstructured Citation
Scardamalia M. and Bereiter C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In: Sawyer, K., editor, Cambridge
handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-118). New York: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.008