View full metadata
Cite as
-
Full Title
EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY
-
Publisher
FrancoAngeli
-
ISSN
2038-9442 (Printed Journal)
2284-015X (Online Journal)
-
Journal Issue Number
1
-
Journal Issue Designation
1
-
Journal Issue Date
2023
-
Full Title
Designing embedded assessment in Higher Education workshops: A pilot study with pre-service teachers
-
By (author)
-
First Page
21
-
Last Page
35
-
Language of text
English
-
Publication Date
2023/07
-
Copyright
2023 FrancoAngeli srl
Main description
Assessment is one of the most controversial and difficult topics to deal with in the context of Higher Education. The following contribution aims to present the proposal of Embedded Assessment within the Didactics workshops included in the Degree Course in Primary Education, which are configured as a mediating activity between Courses and Apprenticeship. Starting from the framework of Pellerey's (2004) trifocal perspective, the trajectories of observation and monitoring of the workshop have been rethought based on the triangulated system of objective, subjective and intersubjective dimensions of assessment. From this point of view, our assessment shows the objectives to be achieved and suggests which strategies and operational proposals to put in place to enable students to orchestrate a series of skills and competences and knowledge necessary for the achievement of the envisaged objectives. When this formative focus translates into the constant effort to turn every teaching activity into an opportunity for assessment, we enter the logic of assessment as learning.
Reference list of
10.3280/ess1-2023oa15175
Unstructured Citation
Agarwal P. K., Bain, P. M., and Chamberlain R. W. (2012). The value of applied research: Retrieval practice improves classroom
learning and recommendations from a teacher, a principal, and a scientist. Educational Psychology Review, 24(3): 437-448.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9210-2
Unstructured Citation
Baughan P. (2020). On your marks: Learner-focused feedback practices and feedback literacy. York: Advance HE. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/your-marks-learner-focused-feedback-practices-and-feedback-literacy.
Unstructured Citation
Berthoz A. (2014). La semplessità. Torino: Codice.
Unstructured Citation
Berthoz A. (2015). La vicarianza. Il nostro cervello creatore di mondi. Torino: Codice Edizioni.
Unstructured Citation
Boud D., and Molloy E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation
in Higher Education, 38(6): 698-712.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
Unstructured Citation
Carless D., and Winstone N. (2019). Designing effective feedback processes in higher education: A learning-focused approach.
London, UK: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351115940
Unstructured Citation
Case J., and Gunstone R. (2002). Metacognitive development as a shift in approach to learning: an in-depth study. Studies
in Higher education, 27(4): 459-470.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507022000011561
Unstructured Citation
Castoldi M. (2018). Curricolo per competenze: percorsi e strumenti (pp. 154-160). Roma: Carocci.
Unstructured Citation
Coggi C., and Ricchiardi P. (2018). Developing effective teaching in higher education. Form@re-Open Journal per la formazione in rete, 18(1): 23-38.
Unstructured Citation
Colarusso S., and Giancola O. (2020). Università e nuove forme di valutazione: Strategie individuali, produzione scientifica, effetti istituzionali (Vol. 59). Sapienza Università Editrice.
Unstructured Citation
Colombo M. (1991). La valutazione nella ricerca sociologica: dalla metodologia alla pratica. Studi di sociologia, 281-296.
Unstructured Citation
Damiano E. (2012). Il “senso” della valutazione. Fenomenologia sociale e opzioni epistemologiche. Education Sciences & Society, 2(2).
Unstructured Citation
Dawson P. (2017). Assessment rubrics: towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice. Assessment & Evaluation
in Higher Education, 42(3): 347-360.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294
Unstructured Citation
Earl L. (2003). Assessment as Learning. Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student learning. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks (CA).
Unstructured Citation
Evans C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1): 70-120.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350
Unstructured Citation
Gaynor J. W. (2020). Peer review in the classroom: Student perceptions, peer feedback quality and the role of assessment.
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(5): 758-775.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1697424
Unstructured Citation
Grimaldi E., Landri P., and Viteritti A. (2022). Il movimento delle forme dell’educazione. Epistemologie, governo e soggettività. Scuola democratica, 13(1): 11-24.
Unstructured Citation
Hadji C. (2017). La valutazione delle azioni educative. Brescia: Morcelliana.
Unstructured Citation
Jonsson A. (2013). Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1):
63-76.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412467125
Unstructured Citation
Le Boterf G. (2008). Des cursus professionnalisants ou par compétences à l’Université: enjeux, craintes et modalités. Actualité de la formation permanente, 209: 49-55.
Unstructured Citation
Najafabadi M. K., and Mahrin M. N. R. (2016). A systematic literature review on the state of research and practice of collaborative
filtering technique and implicit feedback. Artificial intelligence review, 45(2): 167-201.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-015-9443-9
Unstructured Citation
Pellerey M. (2004). Le competenze individuali e il portfolio. Milano: La Nuova Italia.
Unstructured Citation
Perrenoud P. (2002). Dieci Nuove Competenze per Insegnare. Invito al viaggio. Roma: Anicia.
Unstructured Citation
Rivoltella P.C. (2014). La previsione. Neuroscienze, apprendimento, didattica. Brescia: La Scuola.
Unstructured Citation
Rivoltella P.C. (2021). Apprendere a distanza, teorie e metodi. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
Unstructured Citation
Rivoltella P.C., and Rossi, P. G. (2022). Nuovo agire didattico. Brescia: Scholé.
Unstructured Citation
Pentucci M., and Rossi P. G. (2021). Progettazione come azione simulata. Milano: FrancoAngeli (pp. 1-306).
Unstructured Citation
Sambell K., McDowell L., and Montgomery C. (2012). Assessment for learning in higher education. London, UK: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203818268
Unstructured Citation
Tessaro F. (2014). Compiti autentici o prove di realtà?. FORMAZIONE & INSEGNAMENTO. Rivista internazionale di Scienze dell'educazione e della formazione, 12(3): 77-88.
Unstructured Citation
Van der Schaaf M., Baartman L., Prins F., Oosterbaan A., and Schaap H. (2013). Feedback dialogues that stimulate students’
reflective thinking. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(3): 227-245.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.628693
Unstructured Citation
Wilson M., and Sloane K. (2000). From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system. Applied measurement in education,
13(2): 181-208.
https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1302_4