View full metadata
Cite as
-
Full Title
STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI
-
Publisher
FrancoAngeli
-
ISSN
0391-8769 (Printed Journal)
1972-4969 (Online Journal)
-
Journal Issue Number
1
-
Journal Issue Designation
1
-
Journal Issue Date
2023
-
Full Title
Practising institutional logics: arranging digitalization in cardiology
-
By (author)
-
First Page
33
-
Last Page
59
-
Language of text
English
-
Publication Date
2023/06
-
Copyright
2023 FrancoAngeli srl
Main description
Institutional logics literature has made an important contribution in understanding non-linear processes of innovation. While some works insist on the importance of considering how the different institutional logics follow each other, and thus on the concepts of power and organisational field, others indicate that in general, theories on innovation management need new theoretical support. One aspect that needs to be considered further is the way in which organisations adopt innovations in the face of institutional ambiguity. This is the case with digitalization and its impact on organisations. Scholars state that digitalization, being an institutional logic by itself, is increasingly being adopted by organisations that struggle to accommodate new belief systems and arrangements with ‘legacy' practices. In this sense, less addressed in this literature is the understanding of the work that organisations need to perform to adopt a new institutional logic. Starting with a case study in a cardiology department in Northern Italy, this paper analyses how a digital health institutional logic is adopted in cardiology by trying to identify the different arrangements constructed by the different organisational and field actors. The work confirms the importance of the institutional logic approach, offering a contribution to highlight how digital transformation in the health sector is mainly characterised by local responses to the challenges faced.
Reference list of
10.3280/SO2023-001002
Unstructured Citation
Ameri, P., & Angermann, C. (2020). Implementing structured heart failure outpatient monitoring and care in real life. Journal
of Cardiovascular Medicine, 21(4), 315–317.
https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000000935
Unstructured Citation
Bernardi, R., & Exworthy, M. (2020). Clinical managers’ identity at the crossroad of multiple institutional logics in IT innovation:
The case study of a healthcare organization in England. Information Systems Journal, 30(3), 566–595.
https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12267
Unstructured Citation
Bertels, S., & Lawrence, T. B. (2016). Organizational responses to institutional complexity stemming from emerging logics:
The role of individuals. Strategic Organization, 14(4), 336–372.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016641726
Unstructured Citation
Blue, S., Shove, E., Carmona, C., & Kelly, M. P. (2016). Theories of practice and public health: understanding (un) healthy
practices. Critical Public Health, 26(1), 36-50.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2014.980396
Unstructured Citation
Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods, 4th Edition (4th edition). Oxford University Press.
Unstructured Citation
Crider, C. J. (2019). Innovate within product lines or outside of them? An ethnographic study of corporate innovation in a corporate venture makerspace.
Unstructured Citation
Currie, G., Lockett, A., Finn, R., Martin, G., & Waring, J. (2012). Institutional Work to Maintain Professional Power: Recreating
the Model of Medical Professionalism. Organization Studies, 33(7), 937–962.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612445116
Unstructured Citation
Currie, W. L., & Guah, M. W. (2007). Conflicting Institutional Logics: A National Programme for IT in the Organisational Field
of Healthcare. Journal of Information Technology, 22(3), 235–247.
https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000102
Unstructured Citation
Deephouse, D. L., & Heugens, P. P. (2009). Linking social issues to organizational impact: The role of infomediaries and the
infomediary process. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(4), 541-553.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9864-3
Unstructured Citation
DeFillippi, R., & Sydow, J. (2016). Project networks: Governance choices and paradoxical tensions. Project Management Journal,
47(5), 6-17.
https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281604700502
Unstructured Citation
DeFilippis, E. M., Rubin, G., Farr, M. A., Biviano, A., Wan, E. Y., Takeda, K., Garan, H., Topkara, V. K., & Yarmohammadi,
H. (2020). Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Following Heart Transplantation. JACC. Clinical Electrophysiology, 6(8),
1028–1042.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2020.06.023
Unstructured Citation
Doraiswamy, S., Abraham, A., Mamtani, R., & Cheema, S. (2020). Use of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic: scoping review.
Journal of medical Internet research, 22(12), e24087.
https://doi.org/10.2196/24087
Unstructured Citation
EU (2018) Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions on enabling the digital transformation of health and care in the Digital Single Market; empowering citizens and building a healthier society.
Unstructured Citation
Furnari, S. (2019). Situating frames and institutional logics: The social situation as a key institutional microfoundation.
In Microfoundations of institutions. Emerald Publishing Limited.
https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X2019000065B015
Unstructured Citation
Friedland, R. and Alford, R. (1991). Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices and Institutional Contradictions, in W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 232-263.
Unstructured Citation
Gegenhuber, T., Logue, D., Hinings, C. B., & Barrett, M. (2022). Institutional Perspectives on Digital Transformation. In
Digital Transformation and Institutional Theory (Vol. 83, pp. 1-32). Emerald Publishing Limited.
https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20220000083001
Unstructured Citation
Gemma A., W., Fahy, N., Aissat, D., Lenormand, M.-C., Stüwe, L., ZablitSchmidt, I., Delafuys, S., Le Douarin, Y.-M., & Azzopardi
Muscat, N. (2022). Covid-19 and the use of digital health tools: opportunity amid crisis that could transform healthcare delivery.
Eurohealth - Journal of the European Observatory on Health System and Policies, 28(No. 1), 29–34. Greenwood, R., Suddaby,
R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized
fields. Academy of management journal, 45(1), 58-80.
https://doi.org/10.5465/3069285
Unstructured Citation
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional Complexity and Organizational
Responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 317–371.
https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.590299
Unstructured Citation
Heinze, K. L., & Weber, K. (2016). Toward organizational pluralism: Institutional intrapreneurship in integrative medicine.
Organization Science, 27(1), 157-172.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1028
Unstructured Citation
Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., & Greenwood, R. (2018). Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective.
Information and Organization, 28(1), 52-61.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004
Unstructured Citation
Kotseva, K., De Backer, G., De Bacquer, D., Rydén, L., Hoes, A., Grobbee, D., Maggioni, A., Marques-Vidal, P., Jennings, C., Abreu, A., Aguiar, C., Badariene, J., Bruthans, J., Castro Conde, A., Cifkova, R., Crowley, J., Davletov, K., Deckers, J., De Smedt, D., … EUROASPIRE
Unstructured Citation
Investigators*. (2019). Lifestyle and impact on cardiovascular risk factor control in coronary patients across 27 countries:
Results from the European Society of Cardiology ESC-EORP EUROASPIRE V registry. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology,
26(8), 824–835.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487318825350
Unstructured Citation
Kremser, W., & Sydow, J. (2022). When Practices Control Practitioners: Integrating self-reinforcing dynamics into practice-based
accounts of managing and organizing. Organization Theory, 3(3).
https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221109275
Unstructured Citation
Lounsbury, M., Steele, C. W., Wang, M. S., & Toubiana, M. (2021). New directions in the study of institutional logics: From
tools to phenomena. Annual Review of Sociology, 47, 261-280.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-111734
Unstructured Citation
Maines, M., Tomasi, G., Moggio, P., Peruzza, F., Catanzariti, D., Angheben, C., Simoncelli, M., Degiampietro, M., Piffer,
L., Valsecchi, S., & Del Greco, M. (2020). Implementation of remote follow-up of cardiac implantable electronic devices in
clinical practice: Organizational implications and resource consumption. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, 21(9), 648–653.
https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000001011
Unstructured Citation
Malhotra, N., Sakthivel, P., Gupta, N., Nischal, N., & Ish, P. (2022). Telemedicine: A new normal in COVID era; perspective
from a developing nation. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 98(e2), e79–e80.
https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-138742
Unstructured Citation
Minbaeva, D., Muratbekova-Touron, M., Nayir, D., & Moreira, S. (2020). Individual responses to competing institutional logics
in emerging markets. International Business Review, 30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101778
Unstructured Citation
Ocasio, W., & Gai, S. L. (2020). Institutions: Everywhere but not everything. Journal of Management Inquiry, 29(3), 262-271.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492619899331
Unstructured Citation
Oborn, E., Pilosof, N. P., Hinings, B., & Zimlichman, E. (2021). Institutional logics and innovation in times of crisis: Telemedicine
as digital ‘PPE’. Information and Organization, 31(1), 100340.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100340
Unstructured Citation
Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2012). Inside the Hybrid Organization: Selective Coupling as a Response to Competing Institutional
Logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 972–1001.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0405
Unstructured Citation
Planinc, I., Milicic, D., & Cikes, M. (2020). Telemonitoring in heart failure management. Cardiac failure review, 6.
https://doi.org/10.15420/cfr.2019.12
Unstructured Citation
Plsek, P. E., & Wilson, T. (2001). Complexity, leadership, and management in healthcare organisations. BMJ, 323(7315), 746–749.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7315.746
Unstructured Citation
Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2005). The Recomposition of an Organizational Field: Healthcare in Alberta. Organization Studies,
26(3), 351–384.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605050872
Unstructured Citation
Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics. Organization Studies, 30(6), 629–652.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609104803
Unstructured Citation
Schatzki, T. R. (2010). Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. Penn State Press.
Unstructured Citation
Schildt, H. (2022). The institutional logic of digitalization. In Digital Transformation and Institutional Theory (Vol. 83,
pp. 235-251). Emerald Publishing Limited.
https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20220000083010
Unstructured Citation
Scott, W. (2004). Competing logics in healthcare: Professional, state, and managerial. The Sociology of the Economy (267–287).
Unstructured Citation
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W. C., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure
and Process. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601936.001.0001
Unstructured Citation
Toubiana, M. (2020). Once in orange always in orange? Identity paralysis and the enduring influence of institutional logics
on identity. Academy of Management Journal, 63(6), 1739-1774.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0826
Unstructured Citation
Vickers, I., Lyon, F., Sepulveda, L., & McMullin, C. (2017). Public service innovation and multiple institutional logics:
The case of hybrid social enterprise providers of health and wellbeing. Research Policy, 46(10), 1755–1768.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.003
Unstructured Citation
Westley, F., Tjornbo, O., Schultz, L., Olsson, P., Folke, C., Crona, B., & Bodin, Ö. (2013). A Theory of Transformative Agency
in Linked Social Ecological Systems. Ecology and Society, 18(3).
https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05072-180327