View full metadata

DOI data

10.3280/SD2022-001006

Serial Article

Cite as

Journal Data
Journal Issue Data
Serial Article Data
Reference list of 10.3280/SD2022-001006

Unstructured Citation

Alexander, Jeffrey C., Bernhard Giesen, Richard Munch & Neil J. Smelser (eds.), 1987. The Micro-Macro Link. Berkeley-Los Angeles-London: University of California Press.

Unstructured Citation

Basile, Fabio, & Giuseppe Vallar, 2017. Neuroscienze e diritto penale: le questioni sul tappeto. Diritto penale contemporaneo, 4: 269-289.

Unstructured Citation

Baskin-Sommers, Arielle R., & Karelle Fonteneau, 2016. Correctional Change through Neuroscience. Fordham Law Review, 85, 423. -- hp://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/6r/vol85/iss2/2 (consultato il 4 settembre 2021).

Unstructured Citation

Castelfranchi, Cristiano, 2014. Neuronorme: per un approccio non riduzionista. Cosa cercare e non cercare nel cervello. Rivista di filosofia del diritto, 2014, numero speciale, 3: 23-40.

Unstructured Citation

Chandler, Jennifer A., Neil Harrel & Tijana Potkonjak, 2018. Neurolaw today - A systematic review of the recent law and neuroscience literature. International Journal of Law Psychiatry, 65, 101- 341.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.04.002

Unstructured Citation

Cominelli, Luigi, 2015. Cognizione del diritto. Per una sociologia cognitiva dell’agire giuridico. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Unstructured Citation

Cominelli, Luigi,, 2018. Cognition of the Law. Toward a Cognitive Sociology of Law and Behavior. Cham: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89348-8

Unstructured Citation

Cominelli, Luigi,, 2018. Framing Choices to Influence Behaviors: A Debate on the Pros and Cons of Nudging. Diritto & Questioni Pubbliche, 18, 1: 292-306.

Unstructured Citation

Costanzi, Claudio, 2018. La matematica del processo: oltre le colonne d’Ercole della giustizia penale. Questione Giustizia, 4: 166-188.

Unstructured Citation

Crawford, Matthew B., 2008, The limits of neuro-talk. The New Atlantis, 19, -- https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-limits-of-neuro-talk

Unstructured Citation

Damasio, Hanna, Thomas Grabowski, Frank Randall, Albert B. Galaburda & Antonio Damasio, 1994. The Return of Phineas Gage: Clues about the Brain from the Skull of a Famous Patient. Science, 264, 5162: 1102-1105.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8178168

Unstructured Citation

Dash, Sidhartha Sekhar, Harish Chandra Padhi, & Biswadeep Das, 2020. Neurolaw: A Jurisprudential Analysis. European Journal of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, 10: 1546-1560.

Unstructured Citation

D’Avack, Lorenzo, 2013. Neuroscienze ed esperimenti sull’uomo: a partire dall’analisi del parere del Comitato nazionale per la bioetica. In Laura Palazzani & Roberto Zanotti (a cura di). Il diritto nelle neuroscienze. Non “siamo” i nostri cervelli. Torino: Giappichelli.

Unstructured Citation

De Giorgi, Alessandro, 2002. Il governo dell’eccedenza. Postfordismo e controllo della moltitudine. Verona: Ombre Corte.

Unstructured Citation

Dworkin, Ronald, 1975. Hard Cases. Harvard Law Review, 88, 6: 1057-1109.

https://doi.org/10.2307/1340249

Unstructured Citation

Eagleman, David, 2012. Pourquoi les sciences du cerveau peuvent éclairer le droit. In Aa.Vv., Le cerveau et la loi - Analyse de l'émergence du neurodroit, Centre d’analyse stratégique. Document de travail, 7/2012: 33-53.

Unstructured Citation

Erickson, Steven, 2010. Limits of Neurolaw. The Houston Journal of Health Law & Policy, 11: 303-320.

Unstructured Citation

Faigman, David, John Monahan & Christopher Slobogin, 2014. Group to Individual (G2i) Inference in Scientific Expert Testimony. University of Chicago Law Review, 81: 417-480.

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2298909

Unstructured Citation

Fairweather, Leslie, 2000. Prison Architecture: Policies, Design and Experience. London: Routledge.

Unstructured Citation

Farahany, Nita, 2016. Neuroscience and Behavioral Genetics in US Criminal Law. An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, vol 2: 485-509.

https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsv059

Unstructured Citation

Frances, Allen, 2013. Primo, non curare chi è normale. Contro l’invenzione delle malattie. Milano: Feltrinelli.

Unstructured Citation

Ferrajoli, Luigi, 1989. Diritto e ragione. Teoria del garantismo penale. Roma-Bari: Laterza.

Unstructured Citation

Gallo, Enrico, & Vincenzo Ruggiero, 1989. Il carcere immateriale. La detenzione come fabbrica di handicap. Torino: Edizioni Sonda.

Unstructured Citation

Gazzaniga, Michael, 2018. On Determinism and Human Responsibility. In Gregg Caruso & Owen Flanagan (eds.), Neuroexistentialism: Meaning, Morals, and Purpose in the Age of Neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Unstructured Citation

Gertner, Nancy, 2016. Neuroscience and Sentencing. Fordham Law Review, 85: 533-546.

Unstructured Citation

Gkotsi, Georgia Martha, & Jacques Gasser, 2016. Neuroscience in forensic psychiatry: From responsibility to dangerousness. Ethical and legal implications of using neuroscience for dangerousness assessments. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 46: 58-67.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.02.030

Unstructured Citation

Goodenough, Oliver, & Micaela Tucker, 2010. Law and Cognitive Neuroscience. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 6: 61-92.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131523

Unstructured Citation

Grandi, Ciro, 2016. Neuroscienze e responsabilità penale. Nuove soluzioni per problemi antichi? Torino: Giappichelli.

Unstructured Citation

Greely, Henry & Nita Farahany, 2019. Neuroscience and the Criminal Justice System. Annual Review of Criminology, 2: 451-471.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024433

Unstructured Citation

Greene, Joshua, & Jonathan Cohen, 2004. For the Law, Neuroscience Changes Nothing and Everything. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Biological Sciences, 359, 1451: 1775-1785.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1546

Unstructured Citation

Holton, Richard, 2009. Willing, Wanting, Waiting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199214570.001.0001

Unstructured Citation

Jones, Owen D., Jeffrey D. Schall & Francis X. Shen, 2021. Law and Neuroscience, 2nd edition. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.

Unstructured Citation

Jones, Owen D., Jeffrey D. Schall, Read Montague, & Gideon Yaffe, 2020. Detecting Mens Rea in the Brain. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 169, 1: 1-31.

Unstructured Citation

Jones, Owen D., Jeffrey D. Schall, Read Montague, & Gideon Yaffe & Robert Kurzban, 2010. Intuitions of Punishment. Chicago Law Review, 77: 1633-1640

Unstructured Citation

Lavazza, Andrea, & Massimo Reichlin, 2019. Introduction: Moral Enhancement. Topoi, 38: 1-5.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-019-09638-5

Unstructured Citation

Lombardi Vallauri, Luigi, 2014. Conclusioni. Rivista di filosofia del diritto, III, numero speciale: 145-151.

Unstructured Citation

Luhmann, Niklas, 1978. Sistema giuridico e dogmatica giuridica. Traduzione italiana di Alberto Febbrajo. Bologna: il Mulino.

Unstructured Citation

Morse, Stephan, 2004. New Neuroscience, Old Problems. In Brent Garland (ed.), Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice. New York: Dana Press.

Unstructured Citation

Nelken, David, 2004. Using the Concept of Legal Culture. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 29: 1-28.

Unstructured Citation

Neppi Modona, Guido, 1978. Legislazione penale. Il mondo contemporaneo, 1, 2: 584-599.

Unstructured Citation

Persson, Ingmar, & Julian Savulescu, 2019. Inadatti al futuro. L’esigenza di un potenziamento morale. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.

Unstructured Citation

Prina, Franco, 2019. Devianza e criminalità. Concetti, metodi di ricerca, cause, politiche. Roma: Carocci.

Unstructured Citation

Santosuosso, Amedeo, 2014. Cognitive neuroscience, intelligent robots and the interplay humans-machines. Rivista di filosofia del diritto, III, numero speciale: 91-106.

Unstructured Citation

Sapolsky, Robert, 2021. Neuroscience and the Law. University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy, 15, 1: 139-149.

Unstructured Citation

Sapolsky, Robert, 2018. Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst. New York: Vintage Publishing.

Unstructured Citation

Schauer, Frederick, 2010. Neuroscience, lie-detection, and the law: Contrary to the prevailing view, the suitability of brain-based lie-detection for courtroom or forensic use should be determined according to legal and not scientific standards. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14: 101-103.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.12.004

Unstructured Citation

Shen, Francis X., 2021. Toward a Definition of Neurolaw. University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy, 15: 174-185.

Unstructured Citation

Simon, Herbert A., 1957. Models of Man: Social and Rational. Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in Society Setting. New York: Wiley.

Unstructured Citation

Snead, O. Carter, 2011. Cognitive Neuroscience and the Future of Punishment. In Jeffrey Rosen & Benjamin Wittes (eds.), Constitution 3.0: Freedom and Technological Change. Washington: Brookings Press.

Unstructured Citation

Sunstein, Cass, 2014. Why Nudge? The Politics of Libertarian Paternalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Unstructured Citation

Umiltà, Carlo, 2014. Limits of Cognitive Neuroscience. Rivista di filosofia del diritto, III, numero speciale: 7-23.

Unstructured Citation

Viale, Riccardo, 2018. Oltre il nudge. Libertà di scelta, felicità e comportamento. Bologna: il Mulino.

Unstructured Citation

Wacquant, Loïc, 1999. Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Duke: Duke University Press.

Unstructured Citation

Wegner, Daniel, 2002. The Illusion of Conscious Will. Cambridge: MIT Press.

https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3650.001.0001

Unstructured Citation

Zola, Irving, 1972. Medicine as an Institution of Social Control. The Sociological Review, 2: 487-504.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1972.tb00220.x