THIS DOI METADATA WAS LAST UPDATED: 2024-01-10 22:56
Full Title
RIVISTA SPERIMENTALE DI FRENIATRIA
Publisher
FrancoAngeli
ISSN
1129-6437 (Printed Journal)
1972-5582 (Online Journal)
Journal Issue Number
1
Journal Issue Designation
1
Journal Issue Date (YYYY/MM)
2016/03
Full Title
Dalla pericolosità sociale all'analisi del rischio di recidiva di reato per i soggetti con malattia mentale. Prospettiva storica e riflessi attuali in Italia
By (author)
First Page
133
Last Page
150
Language of text
Italian
Publication Date
2016/03
Copyright
2016 FrancoAngeli srl
Introduction or preface
La definitiva chiusura degli OPG impone nel nostro Paese di ripensare modelli organizzativi e trattamentali per i pazienti autori di reato. L'isolamento che la psichiatria delle Misure di Sicurezza e della cura dei soggetti autori di reato ha sofferto nelle ultime decadi obbliga un rapido riaggiornamento delle pratiche e dei sistemi di valutazione dedicati a questa specifica popolazione. Considerate le ragioni storiche all'origine del ritardo accumulato dal nostro Paese rispetto ad altre realtà continentali, il presente lavoro si propone di indagare gli ambiti legislativi e clinico trattamentali necessitanti revisione. I contenuti della Legge 81/14 in particolare invitano a una riflessione sulle molteplici, specifiche dimensioni di rischio ed outcome da considerare nei percorsi terapeutico-riabilitativi dei soggetti in Misura di Sicurezza, percorsi a tutt'oggi ad elevato grado di discrezionalità e soggettività e sganciati nella maggior parte dei casi dalle pratiche dotate di evidenze in letteratura internazionale.
Unstructured Citation
[1] Legge 17 febbraio 2012, n. 9. Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 42 del 20/02/2012. http://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2012/02/20/012G0026/sg
Unstructured Citation
[2] Legge 30 maggio 2014, n. 81. Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 125 del 31/05/2014. http://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2014/5/31/14G00093/sg
Unstructured Citation
[3] Lombroso C. L’uomo delinquente, in rapporto all’antropologia, alla giurisprudenza ed alla psichiatria (Torino: Fratelli Bocca; 1897). Milano: Bompiani; 2006.
Unstructured Citation
[4] Ferri E. L’imputabilità e la negazione del libero arbitrio. Bologna: Zanichelli 1881.
Unstructured Citation
[5] Pelissero M. Il doppio binario nel sistema penale italiano. Diritto Penale Contemporaneo 2011.
Unstructured Citation
[6] Legge 26 luglio 1975, n. 354. Norme sull’ordinamento penitenziario e sulla esecuzione delle misure privative e limitative della libertà (GU n.212 del 9-8-1975 - Suppl. Ordinario ).
Unstructured Citation
[7] De Vito CG. Forensic psychiatric units in Italy from the 1960s to the present. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
2014; 37: 127-134.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.09.012
Unstructured Citation
[8] Andreoli V. Anatomia degli Ospedali Psichiatrici Giudiziari Italiani, Dipartimento Amministrazione Penitenziaria. Roma: Ufficio Studi e Ricerche; 2002.
Unstructured Citation
[9] Harty MA, Tighe J, Leese M, Thornicroft G. Inverse care for mentally ill prisoners: unmet needs in forensic mental health
services. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 2003; 14: 600-614.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1478994031000152763
Unstructured Citation
[10] DPCM del 1/4/2008 Allegato C. Linee di indirizzo per gli interventi negli ospedali psichiatrici giudiziari (OPG) e nelle case di cura e custodia. [11] Collica MT. La crisi del concetto di autore non imputabile “pericoloso”. Diritto Penale Contemporaneo 2012.
Unstructured Citation
[12] Mangione A. La misura di prevenzione fra dogmatica e politica criminale. Padova: Cedam; 2001.
Unstructured Citation
[13] Fornari U. Lettura Magistrale: “La responsabilità professionale degli operatori psichiatrici nella gestione del rischio del comportamento violento”. Bergamo: VII Congresso Nazionale Coordinamento Spdc, “Il futuro degli SPDC tra continuità e innovazione”, 8 novembre 2014.
Unstructured Citation
[14] Catanesi R. Superare l’equivoco. Comunicato Stampa. Soc. It. Psichiatria, 2014. http://www.ispcapp.org/docs/OspedaliPG/Societa_Psichiatria.swf
Unstructured Citation
[15] Dowsett J. Measurement of risk by a community forensic mental health team. Psychiatric Bulletin 2005; 29: 9-12.
https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.29.1.9
Unstructured Citation
[16] Khiroya R, Weaver T, Maden T. Use and perceived utility of structured violence risk assessments in English medium secure
forensic units. Psychiatric Bulletin 2009; 33: 129-132.
https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.108.019810
Unstructured Citation
[17] Mossman D. Assessing predictions of violence: being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
1994; 62: 783-792.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.62.4.783
Unstructured Citation
[18] Steadman H, Cocozza J. Careers of Criminally Insane. Lexington Mass: Lexington books; 1974.
Unstructured Citation
[19] Douglas K. Version 3 of the Historical-Clinical-Risk management-20 (HCR-20): relevance to violence risk assessment and
management in forensic conditional release contexts. Behavioral Sciences and Law 2014; 32: 557-576.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2134
Unstructured Citation
[20] Swanson JW, Holzer CE, Ganju VK. Violence and psychiatric disorder in the community: evidence from the Epidemiologic
Catchment Area surveys. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1990; 41: 761-770.
https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.41.7.761
Unstructured Citation
[21] Fazel S, Langstrom N, Hjern A, Grann M, Lichtenstein P. Schizophrenia, substance abuse and violent crime. JAMA 2009;
301 (19): 2016-2023.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.675
Unstructured Citation
[22] Hodgins S, Cree A, Khalid K, Sainz-Fuentes R, Shortt M, Mak T, et al. Do community mental health teams caring for severely
mentally ill patients adjust treatments and services based on patients’ antisocial or criminal behaviours? European Psychiatry
2009; 24: 373-379.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.07.009
Unstructured Citation
[23] Douglas K, Guy LS, Hart SD. Psychosis as a risk factor for violence to others: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin
2009; 135: 679-706.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016311
Unstructured Citation
[24] Allnutt S, Ogloff J, Adams J, O’Driscoll C, Daffern M, Carroll A, Nanayakkara V, Chaplow D. Managing aggression and violence:
the clinician’s role in contemporary mental health care. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2013; 47: 728-736.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867413484368
Unstructured Citation
[25] Monahan J. The prediction of violent behaviour: toward a second generation of theory and policy. American Journal of Psychiatry 1984; 47: 511-521.
Unstructured Citation
[26] Yang M, Wong S, Coid J. The Efficacy of Violence Prediction: a meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools.
Psychological Bulletin 2010; 136: 740-767.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020473
Unstructured Citation
[27] Singh JP, Grann M, Fazel S. A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: a systematic review and metaregression
analysis of 68 studies involving 25.980 participants. Clinical Psychology Review 2011; 31: 499-513.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.009
Unstructured Citation
[28] Castelletti L, Rivellini G, Straticò E. Predictive validity of violence risk assessment tools, implications for forensic and general psychiatry in Italy. A literature review. Journal of Psychopatology 2014; 20:153-162.
Unstructured Citation
[29] Maden A. Treating violence, a guide to risk management in mental health. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007, p. 109-112.
https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198526902.001.0001
Unstructured Citation
[30] Bonta J. Offender risk assessment. Criminal Justice and Behaviour 2002; 29: 355-379.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854802029004002
Unstructured Citation
[31] Haque Q, Webster C. Structured professional judgement and sequential redirections. Criminal Behaviour Mental Health 2013;
23: 241-251.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.1886
Unstructured Citation
[32] Ullrich S, Keers R, Coid J. Delusions, anger, and serious violence: new findings from the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment
Study. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2014; 40:1174-81.
https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbt126
Unstructured Citation
[33] Douglas K, Hart SD, Webster C, Belfrage H. HCR-20 V3: assessing risk for violence: user guide. Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University; 2013.
Unstructured Citation
[34] Dolores JC, Redding RE. The effects of different forms of risk communication on judicial decision making. International
Journal of Forensic Mental Health 2009; 8:142-146.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14999010903199407
Unstructured Citation
[35] Mossman D. Critique of Pure Risk Assessment or, Kant meets Tarasoff. University of Cincinnati Law Review 2006; 75: 523-609.
Unstructured Citation
[36] Nielssen O. Scientific and ethical problems with risk assessment in clinical practice. Australian and New Zealand Journal
of Psychiatry 2012; 47:1198-1199.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867413498278
Unstructured Citation
[37] Straticò E. L’Empowerment e i Servizi di Salute Mentale. Roma: CIC Edizioni Internazionali; 2009.
Unstructured Citation
[38] Webster C, Martin M, Brink J, Nicholls T, Desmarais S. Short-term assessment of risk and treatability (START). Coquitlam: St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Forensic Service, BC Mental Health and Addiction Services, British Columbia, Canada; 2009.
Unstructured Citation
[39] Shinkfield G, Ogloff J. A review and analysis of routine outcome measures for forensic mental health services. International
Journal of Forensic Mental Health 2014; 13: 252-271.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2014.939788
Unstructured Citation
[40] Castelletti L, Lasalvia A. La valutazione dei bisogni di cura nei pazienti psichiatrici autori di reato. Il ruolo della Camberwell Assessement of Need – Forensic Version (CANFOR). In: Rapporto Istisan. Roma: ISS; 2013