Unstructured Citation

Alkin M.C., Christie C.A. (2013), An evaluation theory tree. In Alkin M.C. (ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theoristis, views and influences, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Unstructured Citation

Bamberg M., Vaessen J., Raimondo E. (eds.) (2016), Dealing with Complexity in Development Evaluation. A Practical Approach, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483399935

Unstructured Citation

Bazeley P. (2018), Integrating Analyses in Mixed Methods Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526417190

Unstructured Citation

Bergman M.M. (2008), Advances in Mixed Methods Research: Theories and Applications, London: Sage Publications.

Unstructured Citation

Biesta, G. (2010), Pragmatism and the philosophical foundations of mixed methods research. In Tashakkori, A. e Teddlie C. (eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Unstructured Citation

Bryman A. (1988), Quality and Quantity in Social Research, London: Routledge.

Unstructured Citation

Campbell D.T., Fiske D.W. (1959), Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix, Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105.

https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016

Unstructured Citation

Caracelli, V.J., Greene J.C. (1997), Crafting mixed-method evaluation designs. In New Directions for Evaluation, 74, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pub.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1069

Unstructured Citation

Creamer, EG. (2017), An Introduction to Fully Integrated Mixed Methods Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802823

Unstructured Citation

Denzin N.K. (1978), The research act. A theoretical introduction to sociological methods, 2nd, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Unstructured Citation

Dewey J. (1938), Logic: The Theory of Inquiry, New York: Henry Holt and Company.

Unstructured Citation

DuBois W.E.B. (1899), The Philadelphia Negro, New York: Schocken Books.

Unstructured Citation

Frechtling J., Sharp L. (1997), User-Friendly Handbook for Mixed Method Evaluations, -- https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1997/nsf97153/start.htm.

Unstructured Citation

Greene J.C. (2007), Mixed Method in Social Inquiry, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Unstructured Citation

Greene J.C., Caracelli, V.J. (ed.) (1997), Advances in Mixed-Method Evaluation: The Challenges and Benefits of Integrating Diverse Paradigm. In New Directions for Evaluation, 74, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pub.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1069

Unstructured Citation

Greene J.C., Caracelli V.J., Graham W.F. (1989), Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274.

https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255

Unstructured Citation

Greene J.C., Hall J.N. (2010), Dialectics and Pragmatism: Being of Consequence. In Tashakkori, A. e Teddlie C. (eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Unstructured Citation

Guba E.G., Lincoln Y.S. (2005), Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences. In Denzin N.K. e Lincoln Y.S. (eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Unstructured Citation

Hanson B. (2008), Wither Qualitative/Quantitative?: Grounds for Methodological Convergence, Quality & Quantity, 42(1), 97–111.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9041-7

Unstructured Citation

Howe K.R. (1988), Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard, Educational researcher, 17(8), 10–16.

https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X017008010

Unstructured Citation

James W. (1907), Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking, New Yorks: Longmans, Green, and co.

https://doi.org/10.1037/10851-000

Unstructured Citation

Johnson R.B. (2012), Dialectical Pluralism and Mixed Research, American Behavioral Scientist, 56(6), 751-754.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212442494

Unstructured Citation

Johnson R.B. (2017), Dialectical Pluralism: A Metaparadigm whose time has come, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 156-173.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815607692

Unstructured Citation

Johnson R.B., Onwuegbuzie A. (2004), Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come, Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.

https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014

Unstructured Citation

Johnson R.B., Onwuegbuzie A.J., Turner L.A. (2007), Toward a definition of mixed methods research, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224

Unstructured Citation

Johnson R.B., Schoonenboom J. (2016), Adding Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research to Health Intervetion Studies: Interacting Differences, in Qualitative Health Research, 26(5), 587-602.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617479

Unstructured Citation

Kuhn T.S. (1962), The structure of scientific revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Unstructured Citation

Leech N.L., Onwuegbuzie A.J. (2009), A typology of mixed methods research designs, Quality & Quantity, 43(2), 265–275.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3

Unstructured Citation

Le Play F. (1855), Les Ouvriers européens: étude sur les travaux, la vie domestique et la condition morale des populations ouvrières de l’Europe, et leurs relations avec les autres classes, précédé d’un exposé de la méthode d’observation, Paris: Imprimerie impériale.

Unstructured Citation

Lincoln Y.S., Guba E.G. (1985), Naturalistic Inquiry, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

Unstructured Citation

Marradi A. (2007), Metodologia delle scienze sociali, Bologna: il Mulino.

Unstructured Citation

Mathison S. (2014), Participatory Evaluation. In Coghlan D. e Brydon-Miller M. (eds.), The Sage Encyclopedia of Action Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Unstructured Citation

Mauceri, S. (2017), L’avvento dell’era dei mixed methods. Nuovo paradigma o deadline di un dibattito?, Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale, 113, 39–61.

https://doi.org/10.3280/SR2017-113002

Unstructured Citation

Maxwell J.A., Mittapalli K. (2010), Realism as a Stance for Mixed Methods Research. In Tashakkori, A. e Teddlie C. (eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Unstructured Citation

Mertens D.M. (2015), Transformative Research and Evaluation, New York: Guilford.

Unstructured Citation

Mertens D.M. (2018), Mixed Method Design in Evaluation, New York: Sage Publications.

https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506330631

Unstructured Citation

Mertens D.M., P. Bazley, L. Bowleg, N. Fielding, N., J. Maxwell, J.F. Molina-Azorin, K. Niglas (2016), The future of mixed methods: A five-year projection to 2020, -- https://mmira.wildapricot.org/resources/Documents/MMIRA%20task%20force%20report%20Jan2016%20final.pdf

Unstructured Citation

Morgan, D.L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 48-76.

https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292462

Unstructured Citation

Morse J.M. (1991), Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation, Nursing research, 40(2), 120–123.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199103000-00014

Unstructured Citation

Onwuegbuzie A.J., Johnson R.B. (2006), The validity issue in mixed research, Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48–63.

Unstructured Citation

Palinkas L.A., Mendon S.J., Hamilton A.B. (2019), Innovations in Mixed Methods Evaluations, Annual Review of Public Health, 1(40), 423-442.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044215

Unstructured Citation

Parkhurst P.E., Lovell K.L., Sprafka S.A., Hodgins M. (1972), Evaluation of videodisc modules: a mixed method approach, Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care, 747–751.

Unstructured Citation

Patton M.Q. (2002), Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 3 ed., London: Sage.

Unstructured Citation

Patton M.Q. (2011), Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use, New York: Guilford.

Unstructured Citation

Peirce C.S. (1878), The Nature of Truth: Classic and Contemporary Perspectives, -- http://www.peirce.org/writings/p119.html.

Unstructured Citation

Phillips D.C. (2005), The Contested Nature of Empirical Educational Research (and Why Philosophy of Education Offers Little Help), Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(4), 577–597.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2005.00457.x

Unstructured Citation

Plano Clark V.L., Ivankova N.V. (2016), Mixed methods research. A guide to the field, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483398341

Unstructured Citation

Sale J.E.M., Lohfeld L.H., Brazil K. (2002), Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research, Quality & Quantity, 36, 43–53.

https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014301607592

Unstructured Citation

Scriven M. (1991), Evaluation Thesaurus, Auckland: EdgePress and Sage.

Unstructured Citation

Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. (eds) (1998), Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Unstructured Citation

Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. (eds.) (2003), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Unstructured Citation

Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. (eds.) (2010), Handbook of mixed methods research for the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Unstructured Citation

Teddlie C., Tashakkori A. (2003), Major issues and controveries in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. (eds.) (2003), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Unstructured Citation

Teddlie C, Tashakkori A. (2012), Common “core” characteristics of mixed methods research: A review of critical issues and call for greater convergence, American Behavioral Scientist, 56(6), 774–788.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211433795

Unstructured Citation

Vergani A. (2005), Valutazione e Sociologia: qualche nota introduttiva, Studi di Sociologia, 43(3), 211-236.