THIS DOI METADATA WAS LAST UPDATED: 2024-01-10 23:05
Full Title
RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA
Publisher
FrancoAngeli
ISSN
0391-6081 (Printed Journal)
1972-5620 (Online Journal)
Journal Issue Number
3
Journal Issue Designation
3
Journal Issue Date (YYYY/MM)
2020/12
Full Title
L'effetto del sovraccarico di scelta: un'indagine su bambini, adolescenti, adulti e anziani
By (author)
First Page
845
Last Page
847
Language of text
Italian
Publication Date
2020/12
Copyright
2020 FrancoAngeli srl
Introduction or preface
L'effetto del sovraccarico di scelta è stato finora studiato prevalentemente su adulti. L'unico studio condotto su fasce di età diverse dagli adulti ha fornito una prima dimostrazione del fatto che le conseguenze negative dell'avere troppa scelta non si estendono in egual misura a bambini, adolescenti, adulti e anziani. Il presente lavoro si propone di indagare ulteriormente le conseguenze negati-ve dell'avere troppa scelta su bambini, adolescenti e anziani. I dati suggeriscono che mentre gli adolescenti sono influenzati dal fenomeno in modo simile agli adulti, i bambini e gli anziani sembrano invece esserne immuni. Sono discusse le implicazioni teoriche e pratiche dei risultati e sono forniti spunti per ulteriori ricerche.
Unstructured Citation
Arrow, K. J. (1963). Social choice and individual values, 2nded. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Unstructured Citation
Chernev, A., Böckenholt, U., & Goodman, J. (2015). Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer
Psychology, 25, 333-358.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.002
Unstructured Citation
Crawford, J. D., & Stankov, L. (1996). Age differences in the realism of confidence judgments: A calibration study using tests
of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 83-103.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90027-8
Unstructured Citation
Coldwell, S. E., Oswald, T. K., & Reed, D. R. (2009). A marker of growth differs between adolescents with high versus low
sugar preference. Physiology & Behavior, 96, 574-580.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.12.010
Unstructured Citation
Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4446-9
Unstructured Citation
Deci, E. L. (1981). The psychology of self-determination. Lexington, MA: Heath.
Unstructured Citation
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Unstructured Citation
Fasolo, B., Carmeci, F. A., & Misuraca R. (2009). The effect of choice complexity on perception of time spent choosing: When
choice takes longer but feels shorter. Psychology & Marketing, 26, 213-228.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20270
Unstructured Citation
Fasolo, B., Misuraca, R., & McClelland, G. H. (2003). Individual differences in adaptive choice strategies. Research in Economics,
57, 219-233 (online).
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9443(03)00032-2
Unstructured Citation
Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics (2012). Older Americans 2012: Key Indicators of Well Being.
Unstructured Citation
Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The Affective Heuristic in Judgment of Risks and Benefits.
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1-17.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1
Unstructured Citation
Harker, W. J. (1979). Implications from psycholinguistics for secondary reading. Reading Horizons, 19, 217-221.
Unstructured Citation
Haynes, G. A. (2009). Investigating the dynamics of choice overload. Psychology and Marketing, 26, 204-212.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20269
Unstructured Citation
Inbar, Y., Botti, S., & Hanko, K. (2011). Decision speed and choice regret: When haste feels like waste. Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology, 47, 533-540.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.01.011
Unstructured Citation
Iyengar, S. S., Huberman, G., & Jiang, W. (2004). How Much Choice is Too Much? Contributions to 401(k) Retirement Plans. In
O. S. Mitchell & S. Utkus (Eds.), Pension design and structure: New lessons from behavioral finance (pp. 83-95). Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/0199273391.003.0005
Unstructured Citation
Iyengar, S. S., Wells, R. E., & Schwartz, B. (2006). Doing better but feeling worse-Looking for the «best» job undermines
satisfaction. Psychological Science, 17, 143-150.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01677.x
Unstructured Citation
Luce, R. D., & Suppes, P. (1965). Preference, utility, and subjective probability. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, (Vol. III, pp.252-410). New York: Wiley.
Unstructured Citation
Markopoulos, P., Read J. C., MacFarlane, S. J., & Höysniemi J. (2008). Evaluating interactive products with and for children. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Unstructured Citation
Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2005). Aging and motivated cognition: The positivity effect in attention and memory. Trends
in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 496-502.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.005
Unstructured Citation
Misuraca, R. (2013). Troppa scelta ha veramente conseguenze negative? Una rassegna di studi empirici” (Do too many choices have negative consequences? An empirical review.). Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 35(1), 129 -153.
Unstructured Citation
Misuraca, R., Ceresia, F., Teuscher, U., & Faraci, P. (2019). The role of the brand on choice overload. Mind and Society,
18, 57-76.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-019-00210-7
Unstructured Citation
Misuraca, R., Faraci, P., Gangemi, A., Carmeci, F. A., & Miceli, S. (2015). The Decision Making Tendency Inventory: A new
measure to assess maximizing, satisficing, and minimizing. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 111-116.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.043
Unstructured Citation
Misuraca, R. & Fasolo, B. (2018). Maximizing versus satisficing in the digital age: Disjoint scales and the case for “construct
consensus”. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 152-160.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.031
Unstructured Citation
Misuraca, R., Miceli, S., & Teuscher, U. (2017). Three effective ways to nurture our brain: Phsysical activity, healthy nutrition,
and music. A review. European Psychologist, 22, 101-120.
https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000284
Unstructured Citation
Misuraca, R., Reutskaja, E., Fasolo, B., & Iyengar, S. S. (2020). How much choice is “good enough”? Moderators of information
and choice overload. In R. Viale (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Bounded Rationality. Abingdon: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315658353-51
Unstructured Citation
Misuraca, R., & Teuscher, U. (2013). Time flies when you maximize. Maximizers and satisficers perceive time differently when
making decisions. Acta Psychologica, 143(2), 176-180.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.03.004
Unstructured Citation
Misuraca, R., Teuscher, U., & Carmeci, F. A. (2016). Who are maximizers? Future oriented and highly numerate individuals.
International Journal of Psychology, 51(4), 307-311.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12169
Unstructured Citation
Peters, E., Hess, T. H., Västfjäll, D., & Auman, C. (2007). Adult age differences in dual information processes: Implications
for the role of affective and deliberative processes in older adults’ decision making. Perspectives on Psychological Science,
2, 1-23.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00025.x
Unstructured Citation
Reutskaja, E., & Hogarth, R. M. (2009). Satisfaction in choice as a function of the number of alternatives: When goods satiate.
Psychology and Marketing, 26, 197-203.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20268
Unstructured Citation
Reutskaja, E., Iyengar, S. S., Fasolo, B., & Misuraca, R. (2020). Cognitive and affective consequences of information and
choice overload. In R. Viale (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Bounded Rationality. Abingdon: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315658353-49
Unstructured Citation
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external locus of control of reinforcement. Psychological
Monographs, 80, 1-28.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976
Unstructured Citation
Salthouse, T. A. (2006). Mental exercise and mental aging: Evaluating the validity of the ‘‘use it or lose it’’ hypothesis.
Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 68-87.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00005.x
Unstructured Citation
Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.
Unstructured Citation
Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R., & Todd, P. M. (2009). What moderates the too-much-choice effect? Psychology & Marketing,
26, 229-253.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20271
Unstructured Citation
Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York: Harper Collins.
Unstructured Citation
Shah, A., & Wolford, G. (2007). Buying behavior as a function of parametric variation of number of choice. Psychological Science,
18, 369-370.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01906.x
Unstructured Citation
United Nations Population Division, DESA (2009).World Population Ageing 2009. New York: United Nations publication.
Unstructured Citation
Walter, J. M., & Soliah, L. A. (1995). Sweetener preference among non-institutionalized older adults. Journal of Nutrition
for the Elderly, 14, 1-13.
https://doi.org/10.1300/J052v14n02_01
Unstructured Citation
Wewers, M. E., & Lowe, N.K. (1990). A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena.
Research in Nursing and Health 13, 227-236.
https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770130405