View full metadata
THIS DOI METADATA WAS LAST UPDATED: 2024-01-10 22:59
Cite as
-
Full Title
RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA
-
Publisher
FrancoAngeli
-
ISSN
0391-6081 (Printed Journal)
1972-5620 (Online Journal)
-
Journal Issue Number
3
-
Journal Issue Designation
3
-
Journal Issue Date (YYYY/MM)
2017/09
-
Full Title
Agentività e competenze sociali: riflessioni teoriche e implicazioni per il management
-
By (author)
-
First Page
349
-
Last Page
363
-
Language of text
Italian
-
Publication Date
2017/09
-
Copyright
2017 FrancoAngeli srl
Introduction or preface
Sebbene le riflessioni sul tema dell'agentività abbiano in passato principalmente preso in considerazione l'individuo come monade, sviluppando modelli interpretativi relativi al comportamento individuale, il riconoscimento del fatto che gli esseri umani sono essenzialmente individui inter-agenti e che gli scambi sociali sono in grado di influenzare l'ambiente e il nostro comportamento in un contesto dinamico e responsivo ha comportato un ampliamento della prospettiva di studio del rapporto tra persona, contesto e comportamento. Il costrutto di agentività, intesa come la capacità di sentirsi e giudicarsi attori responsabili del proprio agire e delle relative conseguenze della propria azione, è stato così affiancato dal quello di inter-agentività, intesa come l'abilità, durante attività condivise, di riconoscersi come agenti insieme ad altri attori sociali. La capacità di attribuire a se stessi e ad altri lo status di agente (e, quindi, una relativa quota di responsabilità) chiama in causa un complesso insieme di processi percettivi e cognitivi che guidano l'elaborazione di informazioni rilevanti, per giungere a un'adeguata lettura della realtà e alla regolazione delle dinamiche inter-personali. Dato che le relazioni con altri attori sociali, il lavoro di gruppo e le dinamiche cooperative e competitive sono al cuore delle attività di business e di management, risulta evidente la necessità di affinare la consapevolezza del nostro e dell'altrui comportamento, del modo in cui noi e i nostri interlocutori pianifichiamo e regoliamo il comportamento e di come siamo in grado di percepirci come agenti intenzionali all'interno di sistemi sociali complessi.
Reference list of
10.3280/RIP2017-003006
Unstructured Citation
Balconi, M., Grippa, E., & Vanutelli, M.E. (2015). What hemodynamic (fNIRS), electrophysiological (EEG) and autonomic integrated
measures can tell us about emotional processing. Brain and Cognition, 95, 67-76.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2015.02.001
Unstructured Citation
Balconi, M., Pala, F., Vanutelli, M. E., Venturella, I., Salati, M. E., Ripamonti, S. C., & Natili, F. (2016). Neurophysiology of management communication: a pilot hyperscanning study. In Proceedings of the XXIV National Congress of the Italian Society of Psychophysiology (pp. 48-49).
Unstructured Citation
Balconi, M., & Vanutelli, M. E. (2016). Competition in the brain. The contribution of EEG and fNIRS modulation and personality
effects in social ranking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1587.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01587
Unstructured Citation
Balconi, M., & Venturella, I. (2017). Neuromanagement. What about emotion and communication? Neuropsychological Trends, 21,
9-21.
https://doi.org/10.7358/neur-2017-021-balc
Unstructured Citation
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Unstructured Citation
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4635.001.0001
Unstructured Citation
Barresi, J., & Moore, C. (2008). The neuroscience of social understanding. In J. Zlatev, T.P. Racine, C. Sinha, & E. Itkonen (Eds.), The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity (pp. 39-66). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Unstructured Citation
Crivelli, D. (2016). Electrophysiological correlates of social information processing for detecting agents in social interaction
scenes: P200 and N250 components. Neuropsychological Trends, (19), 45-69.
https://doi.org/10.7358/neur-2016-019-criv
Unstructured Citation
Crivelli, D., & Balconi, M. (2015). The “social” and “interpersonal” body in spatial cognition. The role of agency and interagency.
Cognitive Processing, 16(S1), 193-196.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0695-8
Unstructured Citation
Ferrari, M., & Quaresima, V. (2012). A brief review on the history of human functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)
development and fields of application. NeuroImage, 63(2), 921-935.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.049
Unstructured Citation
Gallagher, S. (2008). Direct perception in the intersubjective context. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(2), 535-543.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.003
Unstructured Citation
Gallagher, S., & Hutto, D.D. (2008). Understanding others through primary interaction and narrative practice. In J. Zlatev,
T.P. Racine, C. Sinha, & E. Itkonen (Eds.), The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity (pp. 17-38). Am-sterdam: John
Benjamins Publishing Company.
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.12.04gal
Unstructured Citation
Gallese, V., & Goldman, A.I. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
2(12), 493-501.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01262-5
Unstructured Citation
Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
8(9), 396-403.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.002
Unstructured Citation
Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception (1986 Repri). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Unstructured Citation
Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2006). The social nature of perception and action. Current Directions in Psychological Science,
15(3), 99-104.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00415.x
Unstructured Citation
Loveland, K.A. (1991). Social affordances and interaction II: autism and the affordances of the human environment. Ecological
Psychology, 3(2), 99-119.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0302_3
Unstructured Citation
McGann, M., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Self-other contingencies: enacting social perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive
Sciences, 8(4), 417-437.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-009-9141-7
Unstructured Citation
Meltzoff, A.N., & Moore, M.K. (1997). Explaining facial imitation: a theoretical model. Early Development and Parenting, 6(3-4),
179-192.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0917(199709/12)6:3/4
Unstructured Citation
Rubin, H. (2009). Collaborative Leadership. Developing Effective Partnerships for Communities and Schools (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
Unstructured Citation
Synofzik, M., Vosgerau, G., & Newen, A. (2008). Beyond the comparator model: a multifactorial two-step account of agency.
Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 219-239.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.010
Unstructured Citation
Valenti, S.S., & Good, J.M.M. (1991). Social affordances and interaction I: introduction. Ecological Psychology, 3(2), 77-98.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0302_2
Unstructured Citation
Van Overwalle, F. (2009). Social cognition and the brain: a meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 30(3), 829-858.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20547
Unstructured Citation
Van Overwalle, F., & Baetens, K. (2009). Understanding others’ actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: a meta-analysis.
NeuroImage, 48(3), 564-584.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.009