THIS DOI METADATA WAS LAST UPDATED: 2024-01-10 22:51
Full Title
PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA'
Publisher
FrancoAngeli
ISSN
1827-5249 (Printed Journal)
1971-842X (Online Journal)
Journal Issue Number
2
Journal Issue Designation
2
Journal Issue Date (YYYY/MM)
2013/03
Full Title
Genere, ideologia e mass media: i differenti predittori del sessismo ambivalente
By (author)
First Page
119
Last Page
128
Language of text
Italian
Publication Date
2013/03
Copyright
2012 FrancoAngeli srl
Introduction or preface
La Teoria del Sessismo Ambivalente, sviluppata da Glick e Fiske (1996; 2011), prevede che nei confronti di ciascun genere coesistano atteggiamenti di natura apertamente ostile con atteggiamenti apparentemente benevoli, seppur anch'essi sessisti. Questa teoria postula quindi l'esistenza di quattro sessismi: benevolo (BS) e ostile (HS) verso le donne, benevolo (BM) e ostile (HM) verso gli uomini. La presente ricerca si inserisce nell'ambito degli studi che indagano quali fattori incidono maggiormente sui diversi atteggiamenti sessisti. I dati sono stati raccolti tramite questionario su un campione bilanciato per genere (N = 253), con l'obiettivo di comparare il peso di variabili di differente natura testando quattro modelli di regressione. Il genere dei rispondenti e le variabili ideologiche sono risultati predittori di HS, BM e HM; il consumo televisivo influenza entrambi gli atteggiamenti benevoli (BS, BM), mentre l'utilizzo di Internet influenza HS.
Unstructured Citation
Bargh J.A., McKenna K.Y.A. (2004). The internet and social life. Annual Review
of Psychology, 55: 573-590
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141922
Unstructured Citation
Barreto M., Ellemers N. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35: 633-642.
Unstructured Citation
Christopher A.N., Mull M.S. (2006). Conservative ideology and ambivalent sexism.
Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30: 223-230
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00284.x
Unstructured Citation
De Piccoli N., Rollero C. (2010). Differenze e diseguaglianze di genere tra Nord e Sud d’Italia. Attualità di uno stereotipo. Psicologia di Comunità, VI: 65-74.
Unstructured Citation
Di Stefano G., Roccato M. (2005). Una banca di item per misurare l’orientamento alla dominanza sociale in Italia. TPM, 12: 5-20.
Unstructured Citation
Gelli B. (2009). Psicologia della differenza di genere. Milano: Franco Angeli
Unstructured Citation
Glick P., Fiske S.T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating
hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ,
70, 491-512
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
Unstructured Citation
Glick P., Fiske S.T. (1999). The Ambivalence toward Men Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23 (3): 519-536.
Unstructured Citation
Glick P., Fiske S.T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance. Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56: 109-118
Unstructured Citation
Glick P., Fiske S.T. (2011). Ambivalent Sexism Revisited. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35: 530-535.
Unstructured Citation
Glick P., Fiske S.T., Mladinic A., Saiz J.L., Abrams D., Masser B. et al. (2000).
Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across
cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79: 763-775
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763
Unstructured Citation
Glick P., Lameiras M., Fiske S.T., Eckes T., Masser B., Volpato C. et al. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86: 713-728.
Unstructured Citation
Glick P., Lameiras M., Rodríguez Castro Y. (2002). Education and Catholic religiosity
as predictors of hostile and benevolent sexism toward women and men.
Sex Roles, 47: 433-441
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021696209949
Unstructured Citation
Holzner S. (2009). Facebook marketing: Leverage social media to grow your business. Albany, NY: SUNY press.
Unstructured Citation
Jost J.T., Kay A.C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary
gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse form of system justification.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88: 498-509
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498
Unstructured Citation
Kian E.M., Clavio G., Vincent J., Shaw S.D. (2011). Homophobic and sexist yet
uncontested: Examining football fan postings on Internet message boards.
Journal of Homosexuality, 58 (5): 680-699
https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2011.563672
Unstructured Citation
Managanelli Rattazzi A.M., Volpato C., Canova L. (2008). L’atteggiamento ambivalente verso donne e uomini. Un contributo alla validazione delle scale ASI e AMI. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 35: 261-287
Unstructured Citation
Mazzara B. (2008). I discorsi dei media e la psicologia sociale. Roma: Carocci
Unstructured Citation
Moya M., Glick P., Expósito F., de Lemus S., Hart J. (2007). It’s for your own good: Benevolent sexism and women’s reactions to protectively justified restrictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33: 1421-1434
Unstructured Citation
Nowatski J., Morry M.M. (2009). Women’s intentions regarding, and acceptance
of, self-sexualizing behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33: 95-107
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.01477.x
Unstructured Citation
Plakoyiannaki E., Mathioudaki K., Dimitratos P., Zotos Y. (2008). Images of
Women in Online Advertisements of Global Products: Does Sexism Exist?.
Journal of Business Ethics, 83: 101-112
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9651-6
Unstructured Citation
Riva G. (2004). Psicologia dei nuovi media. Bologna: Il Mulino
Unstructured Citation
Rollero C., Fedi A. (2012). Ambivalent attitudes toward women and men: Recognizability of stereotypes and effects on self-perception. Psicología Politica, 44: 69-86
Unstructured Citation
Sakalli N. (2002). Beliefs about wife beating among Turkish college students: The
effects of patriarchy, sexism, and sex differences. Sex Roles, 44: 599-610
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012295109711
Unstructured Citation
Sidanius J., Pratto F. (1999), Social Dominance. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Unstructured Citation
Viki G.T., Abrams D. (2002). But she was unfaithful: Benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles, 47: 289-293.
Unstructured Citation
Wiles J.A., Wiles C.R., Tjernlund A. (1995). A Comparison of Gender Role Portrayals in Magazine Advertising: The Netherlands, Sweden and the USA. European Journal of Marketing, 29 (11): 35-49.