View full metadata
THIS DOI METADATA WAS LAST UPDATED: 2024-01-10 22:51
Cite as
-
Full Title
PARADIGMI
-
Publisher
FrancoAngeli
-
ISSN
1120-3404 (Printed Journal)
2035-357X (Online Journal)
-
Journal Issue Number
3
-
Journal Issue Designation
3
-
Journal Issue Date (YYYY/MM)
2015/04
-
Full Title
Spatiality, imagery, and the paradox of fictional emotions
-
By (author)
-
First Page
143
-
Last Page
158
-
Language of text
English
-
Publication Date
2015/04
-
Copyright
2014 FrancoAngeli srl
Introduction or preface
Oggetto d'analisi è il significato di "realtà" ed il contributo dell'immaginazione alla sua definizione. Nel primo paragrafo, attraverso un'analisi delle tesi di S. Kosslyn, ci si chiede in che misura i caratteri spaziali dell'immaginario possano essere interpretati come essenzialmente afferenti ai giudizi di realtà. Nel secondo paragrafo viene affrontato il tema delle relazioni tra immaginazione e realtà alla luce delle analisi di Sartre ne L'imaginaire. Quest'analisi si conclude con l'elaborazione di due definizioni complementari di realtà. Nell'ultimo paragrafo l'analisi precedente è applicata al cosiddetto "paradosso delle emozioni finzionali", come illustrazione del riassetto concettuale proposto.
Reference list of
10.3280/PARA2014-003010
Unstructured Citation
Davidson D. (1982). Two Paradoxes of Irrationality. In Wollheim R., Hopkins J., eds., Philosophical Essays on Freud, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, pp. 289-305.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554636.018
Unstructured Citation
Feagin S. (1996). Reading With Feeling: The Aesthetics of Appreciation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501721465
Unstructured Citation
Gendler T.S., Kovakovich K. (2006). Genuine Rational Fictional Emotions. In Kieran M. (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 241-53.
Unstructured Citation
Husserl E. (1973). Die Idee der Phänomenologie. Fünf Vorlesungen. Husserliana II, edited by W. Biemel, Den Haag: Martinus
Nijhoff.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2480-8
Unstructured Citation
Kosslyn S.M. (1983). Ghosts in the Mind’s Machine. Creating and Using Images in the Brain. London: W.W. Norton and Co.
Unstructured Citation
Kosslyn S.M., Thompson W.L., Ganis G. (2006). The Case for Mental Imagery. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179088.001.0001
Unstructured Citation
Moran R. (1994). The Expression of Feeling in Imagination. Philosophical Review, 103(1): 75-106.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2185873
Unstructured Citation
Noë A. (2004). Action in Perception. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.
Unstructured Citation
Paskow A. (2004). The Paradoxes of Art: A Phenomenological Investigation. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616280
Unstructured Citation
Sartre J.-P. (1958). Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. London: Methuen.
Unstructured Citation
Sartre J.-P. (2004). The Imaginary. A Phenomenological Psychology of the Imagination. London: Routledge.
Unstructured Citation
Schaper E. (1978). Fiction and the Suspension of Disbelief. British Journal of Aesthetics, 18: 31-44.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/18.1.31
Unstructured Citation
Thompson E. (2007). Mind in Life. Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge (MA): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Unstructured Citation
Walton K. (1990). Mimesis as Make-Believe. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.8763