Full Title
MERCATI & COMPETITIVITÀ
Publisher
FrancoAngeli
ISSN
1826-7386 (Printed Journal)
1972-4861 (Online Journal)
Journal Issue Number
1
Journal Issue Designation
1
Journal Issue Date (YYYY/MM)
2017/03
Full Title
Consumers' responses to ethical brand crises on social media platforms
By (author)
First Page
141
Last Page
157
Language of text
English
Publication Date
2017/03
Copyright
2017 FrancoAngeli srl
Introduction or preface
Ethical brand crises are a breach in the core values held by a brand and a violation of the relationship between the brand and its stakeholders, and social networks provide consumers with a platform upon which they can discuss these crises and their meanings in detail. Through a qualitative content analysis and an interpretive approach, here we investigate the reaction of the social media audience to an apology released by a company after an ethical brand crisis. The emerging findings suggest that consumers engage in consumer identity work according to different strategies: they sublimate or minimize the crisis (defence of the brand) or focus on the ideological structure of marketing (criticism). In both cases, consumers offer the company an opportunity to assess and improve the ethical dimension of their marketing practices.
Unstructured Citation
Benoit W.L. (1997). Image repair discourse and crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 23: 177-186,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(97)90023-0
Unstructured Citation
Coombs T.W. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: the development and application of situational crisis
communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10, 3: 163-177,
https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049
Unstructured Citation
Coombs T.W., Holladay S.J. (2001). An extended examination of the crisis situations: a fusion of the relational management
and symbolic approaches. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13, 4: 321-340,
https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1304_03
Unstructured Citation
Grappi S., Romani S. (2015). Company post-crisis communication strategies and the psychological mechanism underlying consumer
reactions. Journal of Public Relations Research, 27: 22-45,
https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2014.924839
Unstructured Citation
Holt D.B. (2004). How Brands Become Icons: The Principles of Cultural Branding. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press. ISBN-13: 9781578517749.
Unstructured Citation
Kozinets R.V. (2016). Netnography: Redefined. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeos0782
Unstructured Citation
Lee J.S., Kwak D.H. (2016). Consumers’ responses to public figures’ transgression: moral reasoning strategies and implications
for endorsed brands. Journal of Business Ethics, 137, 1: 101-113,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2544-1
Unstructured Citation
Lee J.S., Kwak D.H. and Moore D. (2015). Athletes’ transgressions and sponsor evaluations: a focus on consumers’ moral reasoning
strategies. Journal of Sport Management, 29, 6: 672-687,
https://doi.org/10.1123/JSM.2015-0051
Unstructured Citation
Romani S., Grappi S. and Bagozzi R.P. (2013). Explaining consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility: the role of
gratitude and altruistic values. Journal of Business Ethics, 114 (2): 193-206,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1337-z
Unstructured Citation
Schau, H.J., Muñiz, A.M. and Arnould, E.J (2009). How Brand Community Practices Create Value. Journal of Marketing 73, 5:
30-51,
https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.5.30
Unstructured Citation
Strauss A.L., Corbin J.M. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Unstructured Citation
Vallaster C., von Wallpach S. (2013). An online discursive inquiry into the social dynamics of multi-stakeholder brand meaning
co-creation. Journal of Business Research, 66, 9: 1505-1515,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.09.012
Unstructured Citation
Xu K., Li W. (2013). An ethical stakeholder approach to crisis communication: a case study of Foxconn’s 2010 employee suicide
crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 2: 371-86,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1522-0
Unstructured Citation