Full Title
MALTRATTAMENTO E ABUSO ALL'INFANZIA
Publisher
FrancoAngeli
ISSN
1591-4267 (Printed Journal)
1972-5140 (Online Journal)
Journal Issue Number
1
Journal Issue Designation
1
Journal Issue Date (YYYY/MM)
2018/03
Full Title
Il funzionamento morale come fattore di rischio per il bullismo e il cyberbullismo
By (author)
First Page
47
Last Page
66
Language of text
Italian
Publication Date
2018/03
Copyright
2018 FrancoAngeli srl
Introduction or preface
La letteratura indica che il funzionamento morale è rilevante per la spiegazione del bullismo e che bullismo e cyberbullismo sono sovrapposti, nonostante questi fenomeni vengano spesso considerati separatamente. Il presente studio, che ha coinvolto 206 adolescenti (14-17 anni), mirava a investigare se la percezione di gravità morale delle prepotenze e altre dimensioni di funzionamento morale differissero nel cyberbullismo rispetto al bullismo. Non sono emerse differenze nella percezione degli adolescenti della gravità del bullismo rispetto al cyberbullismo, ma sono comparsi livelli più alti di disimpegno ed emozioni morali suscitate dalle situazioni di bullismo tradizionale. La percezione di accettabilità morale delle prepotenze era associata al mettere in atto prevaricazioni sia offline sia online e alla difesa della vittima, ma solo nel bullismo offline. Anche il disimpegno morale era associato positivamente al ruolo di esterno, solo per il bullismo offline. Il funzionamento morale appare, quindi, più rilevante per spiegare il coinvolgimento nel bullismo tradizionale che nel cyberbullismo. Tuttavia, compare anche una diluizione morale propria del cyberbullismo.
Unstructured Citation
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Unstructured Citation
Berger, C., & Caravita, S. C. S. (2016). Why do early adolescents bully? Exploring the influence of prestige norms on social
and psychological motives to bully. Journal of Adolescence, 46, 45-56,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.10.020
Unstructured Citation
Camodeca, M., Caravita, S. C. S., & Coppola, G. (2015). Bullying in preschool: The associations between participant roles,
social competence, and social preference. Aggressive Behavior, 41, 4, 210-221,
https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21541
Unstructured Citation
Caravita, S. C. S., & Gini, G. (2010). L’(Im) moralità del bullismo. Milano: Unicopli.
Unstructured Citation
Caravita, S. C. S., Pöyhönen, V., Rajala, I., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). The architecture of high status among Finnish youth.
British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29, 668-679,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02034.x
Unstructured Citation
Caravita, S. C., Colombo, B., Stefanelli, S., & Zigliani, R. (2016). Emotional, psychological and behavioral responses elicited
by the exposition to cyberbullying situations: Two experimental studies. Psicología Educativa, 22, 1, 49-59,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2016.02.003
Unstructured Citation
Fredstrom, B. K. (2011). Electronic and school-based victimization: Unique con-texts for adjustment difficulties during adolescence.
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 4, 405-415,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9569-7
Unstructured Citation
Genta, M. L., Brighi, A., & Guarini, A. (2013). Cyberbullismo: Ricerche e strategie di intervento. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Unstructured Citation
Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., & Hymel, S. (2014). Moral disengagement among children and youth: A meta‐analytic review of links to
aggressive behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 1, 56-68,
https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21502
Unstructured Citation
Hawley, P. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted
machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 279-309.
https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2003.0013
Unstructured Citation
Hymel, S., Closson, L. M., Caravita, S. C. S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2010). Social status among peers: From sociometric attraction
to peer acceptance to perceived popularity. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), Handbook of childhood social development:
2nd Edition (pp. 375-392). Malden, MA: Wiley/Blackwell.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444390933.ch20
Unstructured Citation
Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Halth, 41,
6, 22-30,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017
Unstructured Citation
Macháčková, H., Dedkova, L., Sevcikova, A., & Cerna, A. (2013). Bystanders’ support of cyberbullied schoolmates. Journal of
Community and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 25-36,
https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2135
Unstructured Citation
Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., Palladino, B. E., Friesen, A., Friesen, S., Ortega, R., Calmaestra, J., et al. (2012). Cyberbullying
definition among adolescents: A comparison across six European countries. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking,
15, 9, 455-463,
https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0040
Unstructured Citation
Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Unstructured Citation
Olweus, D. (1996). Bullismo a scuola. Ragazzi oppressi, ragazzi che opprimono. Firenze: Giunti.
Unstructured Citation
Palladino, B. E., Nocentini, A., & Menesini, E. (2015). Psychometric properties of the Florence cyberbullying-cybervictimization
scales. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18, 2, 112-119,
https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0366
Unstructured Citation
Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement,
hostile attribution bias, and out-come expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 2, 81-94,
https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20336
Unstructured Citation
Renati, R., Berrone, C., & Zanetti, M., A. (2012). morally disengaged and unempathic: Do cyberbullies fit these definitions?
An exploratory study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 391-398,
https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0046
Unstructured Citation
Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant
roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1-15,
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1
Unstructured Citation
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact
in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 4, 376-385,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
Unstructured Citation
Vandebosch, H., & Van Cleemput, K. (2008). Defining cyberbullying: A qualitative research into the perceptions of youngsters.
CyberPsychology & Behav-ior,11, 4, 499-503,
https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0042
Unstructured Citation
Zanetti, M. A., & Colangelo (2018, in press). Educare per prevenire la sofferenza delle cybervittime. Ricadute educative a
partire dalla legge 71/2017. Maltrattamento e abuso all’infanzia, 20, 1, 11-30.
https://doi.org/10.3280/MAL2018-001002
Unstructured Citation
Wright, M. F., & Li, Y. (2011). The associations between young adults’ face-to-face prosocial behaviors and their online prosocial
behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1959-1962,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.019