View full metadata
Cite as
-
Full Title
FINANCIAL REPORTING
-
Publisher
FrancoAngeli
-
ISSN
2036-671X (Printed Journal)
2036-6779 (Online Journal)
-
Journal Issue Number
2
-
Journal Issue Designation
2
-
Journal Issue Date
2024
-
Full Title
The dynamics of cost behavior: Unveiling sticky costs in private companies
-
By (author)
-
First Page
13
-
Last Page
46
-
Language of text
English
-
Publication Date
2024/12
-
Copyright
2024 FrancoAngeli srl
Main description
Purpose: While research on cost stickiness has predominantly focused on large public companies, the variability in results has cast doubt on the generalizability of sticky cost behavior to all companies. This paper investigates whether cost sticki-ness is observable in smaller private companies – i.e., firms without publicly traded securities – thus addressing a notable gap in the literature. Design/methodology/approach: This study adopts the empirical framework of Anderson et al. (2003), using data from private Italian firms from 1998 to 2022. Furthermore, it extends the scope of analysis to include such diverse cost catego-ries as selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) costs, total labor cost, purchase costs, rent costs, and other operating expenses. Findings: The findings indicate that SG&A costs in private firms are significantly less sticky than those reported for large public firms. Cost stickiness is also ob-served in labor, rent, and other operating costs but not in purchase costs. Notably, cost stickiness varies across industries. Originality/value: This study sheds new light into the dynamics of cost stickiness by highlighting how asymmetrical cost behavior in small and medium-sized pri-vate companies differs from that in large public companies, enhancing the under-standing of cost management practices across business contexts.
Reference list of
10.3280/FR2024-002002
Unstructured Citation
Anderson, S. W., & Lanen, W. N. (2009). Understanding cost management: What can we learn from the evidence on ‘sticky costs’? (Working Paper). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Unstructured Citation
Balakrishnan, R., & Gruca, T. S. (2008). Cost stickiness and core competency: A note. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4),
993-1006.
https://doi.org/10.1506/car.25.4.2
Unstructured Citation
Balakrishnan, R., Labro, E., & Soderstrom, N. S. (2011). Cost structure and sticky costs (Working paper). The University of
Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1562726
Unstructured Citation
Banker, R., & Chen, L. (2006). Predicting earnings using a model based on cost variability and cost stickiness. The Accounting
Review, 81(2), 285-307. -- http://www.jstor.org/stable/4093140.
https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2006.81.2.285
Unstructured Citation
Banker, R., Basu, S., Byzalov, D., & Chen, J. (2016). The confounding effect of cost stickiness on conservatism estimates.
Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(1), 203-220.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.07.001
Unstructured Citation
Banker, R., Byzalov, D., & Chen, L. (2013). Employment protection legislation, adjustment costs and cross-country differences
in cost behavior. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(1), 111-127.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2012.08.003
Unstructured Citation
Banker, R., Byzalov, D., Ciftci, M., & Mashruwala, R. (2014a). The moderating effect of prior sales changes on asymmetric
cost behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 221-242.
https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50726
Unstructured Citation
Banker, R., Byzalov, D., & Plehn-Dujowich, J. (2014b). Demand uncertainty and cost behavior. The Accounting Review, 89(3),
839-865.
https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50661
Unstructured Citation
Calleja, K., Steliaros, M., & Thomas, D. C. (2006). A note on cost stickiness: Some international comparisons. Management
Accounting Research, 17(2), 127-140.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2006.02.001
Unstructured Citation
Cannon, J. N. (2014). Determinants of ‘sticky costs’: An analysis of cost behavior using United States air transportation
industry data. The Accounting Review, 89(5), 1645-1672.
https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50806
Unstructured Citation
Chen, C., Lu, H., & Sougiannis, T. (2012). The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling,
general, and administrative costs. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 252-282.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01094.x
Unstructured Citation
Chen, J., Kama, I., & Lehavy, R. (2019). A contextual analysis of the impact of managerial expectations on asymmetric cost
behavior. Review of Accounting Studies, 24(2), 665-693.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-019-09491-2
Unstructured Citation
Dalla Via, N., & Perego, P. (2014). Sticky cost behaviour: Evidence from small and medium sized companies. Accounting and
Finance, 54(3), 753-778.
https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12020
Unstructured Citation
Dierynck, B., Landsman, W. R., & Renders, A. (2012). Do managerial incentives drive cost behavior? Evidence about the role
of the zero earnings benchmark for labor cost behavior in private Belgian firms. The Accounting Review, 87(4), 1219-1246.
-- http://www.jstor.org/stable/23246275.
https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50153
Unstructured Citation
Dye, R. A., & Sridhar, S. (2002). Resource allocation effects of price reactions to disclosures. Contemporary Accounting Research,
19, 385-410.
https://doi.org/10.1092/6XYN-E8F1-BW3F-CUCU
Unstructured Citation
Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. Wiley.
Unstructured Citation
Habib, A., & Huang, H. J. (2019). Cost stickiness in the New Zealand charity sector. The International Journal of Accounting,
54(3).
https://doi.org/10.1142/S1094406019500124
Unstructured Citation
Hall, C. M. (2016). Does ownership structure affect labor decisions? The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1671-1696.
https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51384
Unstructured Citation
Holzhacker, M., Krishnan, R., & Mahlendorf, M. D. (2015a). Unraveling the black box of cost behavior: An empirical investigation
of risk drivers, managerial resource procurement, and cost elasticity. The Accounting Review, 90(6), 2305-2335.
https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51092
Unstructured Citation
Kama, I., & Weiss, D. (2013). Do earnings targets and managerial incentives affect sticky costs? Journal of Accounting Research,
51(1), 201-224.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00471.x
Unstructured Citation
Lee, E., Kim, C., & Leach-López, M. (2020). Banking competition and cost stickiness. Finance Research Letters, 101859.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101859
Unstructured Citation
Loy, T. R., & Hartlieb, S. (2018). Have estimates of cost stickiness changed across listing cohorts? Journal of Management
Control, 29(2), 161-181.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-018-0263-3
Unstructured Citation
Rouxelin, F., Wongsunwai, W., & Yehuda, N. (2018). Aggregate cost stickiness in GAAP financial statements and future unemployment
rate. The Accounting Review, 93(3), 299-325.
https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51939
Unstructured Citation
Weiss, D. (2010). Cost behavior and analysts’ earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1441-1471. -- http://www.jstor.org/stable/20744165.
https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1441
Unstructured Citation
White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica,
48(4), 817-838.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934