View full metadata
THIS DOI METADATA WAS LAST UPDATED: 2026-10-27 17:59
Cite as
-
Full Title
ECONOMIA PUBBLICA
-
Publisher
FrancoAngeli
-
ISSN
0390-6140 (Printed Journal)
1972-5566 (Online Journal)
-
Journal Issue Number
2
-
Journal Issue Designation
2
-
Journal Issue Date
2026
-
Full Title
An analysis of ASN (2021-2023) and its impact on academic recruitment in public economics
-
By (author)
-
First Page
163
-
Last Page
219
-
Language of text
English
-
Publication Date
2026/09
-
Copyright
2026 FrancoAngeli srl
Main description
This paper presents an empirical and institutional evaluation of the Italian National Scientific Qualification (ASN) in the field of Public Economics (sector 13/A3), based on data from the 2021-2023 assessment cycle. The analysis examines the scientific profiles of applicants and those who qualified, focusing on their research output, thematic interests, and the determinants of qualification outcomes. We investigate whether obtaining the qualification leads to actual recruitment and how such effects vary across disciplinary sectors. Results indicate that the benefits of ASN (i.e., actual hiring into associate or full professorships) are largely concentrated among candidates already affiliated with Public Economics, and internal candidates exhibit a clear advantage over their external counterparts. These findings underscore the enduring influence of institutional proximity and network dynamics, despite the formal role of national evaluation standards. The study concludes with a set of targeted policy recommendations aimed at improving fairness, transparency, and the overall effectiveness of academic hiring practices in the Italian university system.
Reference list of
10.3280/EP2026-002001
Unstructured Citation
Abramo G., D’Angelo C. A. (2015a). An assessment of the first “scientific habilitation” for university appointments in Italy.
Economia Politica, 32(3), 329-357.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-015-0016-9
Unstructured Citation
Abramo G., D’Angelo C. A., Rosati F. (2015b). The determinants of academic career advancement: Evidence from Italy. Science
and Public Policy, 42(6), 761-774.
https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu086
Unstructured Citation
Bagues M., Sylos-Labini M., & Zinovyeva N. (2019). Connections in scientific committees and applicants’ self-selection: Evidence
from a natural randomized experiment. Labour Economics, 58, 81-97.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2019.04.005
Unstructured Citation
Bethmann D., Bransch F., Kvasnicka M., Sadrieh A. (2023). Home Bias in Top Economics Journals. IZA Discussion Paper No. 15965.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4368839
Unstructured Citation
Bises B., Papagni E., Pignataro G. (2020). L’evoluzione della Scienza delle Finanze dall’osservatorio della Commissione Asn 2016-2018. Rivista di Diritto Finanziario e Scienza delle Finanze, LXXIX(4), I, 363-424.
Unstructured Citation
Card D., DellaVigna S. (2013). Nine facts about top journals in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 51(1), 144-161.
https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.1.144
Unstructured Citation
Colussi T. (2018). Social ties in academia: A friend is a treasure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(1), 45-50.
https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00666
Unstructured Citation
Combes P., Linnemer L., Visser M. (2008). Publish or peer-rich? The role of skills and networks in hiring economics professors.
Labour Economics, 15(3), 423-441.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2007.04.003
Unstructured Citation
Durante R., Labartino G. and Perotti R. (2011). Academic Dynasties: Decentralization and Familism in the Italian Academia.
NBER working paper 17572.
https://doi.org/10.3386/w17572
Unstructured Citation
Fratini S. M., Naccarato A. (2025). L’Abilitazione Scientifica Nazionale nei sei settori economici: un esame dei dati (2025). Presentazione SIE-CURV. Downloaded on June 4, 2025, from: -- https://www.siecon.org/sites/siecon.org/files/media_wysiwyg/analisi_asn_ottobre_2024_1.pdf.
Unstructured Citation
Gläser J., Laudel G. (2007). The Social Construction of Bibliometric Evaluations. In: Whitley R., Gläser J. (eds). The Changing
Governance of the Sciences. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, vol 26. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6746-4_5
Unstructured Citation
Hicks D., Wouters P., Waltman L., de Rijcke S., Rafols I. (2015). The Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics. Nature, 520,
429-431.
https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a
Unstructured Citation
Marini G. (2017). New promotion patterns in Italian universities: Less seniority and more productivity? Data from ASN. Higher
Education, 73(2), 189-207.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0008-x
Unstructured Citation
Marzolla M. (2015). Quantitative analysis of the Italian national scientific qualification. Journal of Informetrics, 9(2),
285-316.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.02.006
Unstructured Citation
Marzolla M. (2016). Assessing evaluation procedures for individual researchers: The case of the Italian National Scientific
Qualification. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 408-438.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.01.009
Unstructured Citation
Medoff M. H. (2003). Editorial favoritism in economics?. Southern Economic Journal, 70(2), 425-434.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.2003.tb00580.x
Unstructured Citation
Moed H. F. (2005). Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Unstructured Citation
Perotti R. (2002). The Italian University System: Rules vs. Incentives, presented at the First Conference on Monitoring, ISAE, Rome -- (Available from: https://igier.unibocconi.eu/sites/default/files/media/attach/Universita_6_4-02.pdf).
Unstructured Citation
Pezzoni M., Sterzi V., Lissoni F. (2012). Career progress in centralized academic systems: Social capital and institutions
in France and Italy. Research Policy, 41(4), 704-719.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.009
Unstructured Citation
Seglen P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ, 314(7079), 498-502.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7079.0f
Unstructured Citation
Waltman L., and van Eck N. J. (2013). Source normalized indicators of citation impact: An overview of different approaches
and an empirical comparison. Scientometrics, 96(3), 699-716.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0913-4
Unstructured Citation
Wooldridge J. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross-Section and Panel Data. Second edition, MIT Press.
Unstructured Citation
Zinovyeva N., Bagues M. (2015). The Role of Connections in Academic Promotions. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics,
7(2), 264-92.
https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20120337