Full Title
ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE
Publisher
FrancoAngeli
ISSN
1126-1668 (Printed Journal)
1972-4802 (Online Journal)
Journal Issue Number
2
Journal Issue Designation
2
Journal Issue Date (YYYY/MM)
2016/12
Full Title
Consumers' Preferences and Willingness-To-Pay for Misfit Vegetables
By (author)
First Page
133
Last Page
154
Language of text
English
Publication Date
2016/12
Copyright
2016 FrancoAngeli srl
Introduction or preface
Food retailers are accustomed not to offer the so-called "Misfits", that is fruits and vegetables whose appearance do not meet the best visual quality standards. This is due to the assumption that consumers only prefer fruits and vegetables with perfect appeal, which ultimately contribute towards the global, food waste bad tendencies. Therefore, it is important to understand consumers' acceptance of the pricing possibilities for misfits. This aspect inspired the current study, which is aimed to investigate whether consumers could accept or reject misfit vegetables if there were any possibility of choosing such produce. A sample of 200 consumers was surveyed in Bologna, Italy, in June 2014 using a choice experiment approach and fresh carrots as the product of interest. Data were analysed using both Multinomial Logit (mnl) and Random Parameter Logit (rpl) models. The results suggest that appearance actually influenced consumer preferences for fresh carrots, on the basis of deformation as well as irregularity in terms of size, reducing the probability to purchase. However, consumers were showing more tolerance for irregular sized carrots compared to deformed ones. In addition, misfits were more accepted by consumers purchasing fresh fruits and vegetables at fresh food market compared to supermarket customers.
Unstructured Citation
Atanasoaie, G. (2011). Who is the Consumer of Organic Food Products? Agricultura, agricultural practice and science journal, 2(1), 108-113.
Unstructured Citation
Becker, T. (1999). The economics of food quality standards, The 2nd interdisciplinary workshop on standardization research, May 24-27, 1999, University of Federal Armed Forces, Hamburg, Germany (pp. 1-35).
Unstructured Citation
Boccaletti, S. & Moro, D. (2000). Consumer willingness-to-pay for GM food products in Italy. AgBioForum, 3(4), 259-267.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7508(01)00049-0
Unstructured Citation
Brunso, K., Ahle Fjord, T. & Grunert, K.G. (2002). Consumers’ food choice and quality perception. MAPP working paper 77. Aarhus: Aarhus School of Business.
Unstructured Citation
Creusen, M.E.H. & Schoormans, J.P.L. (2005). The Different Roles of Product Appearance in Consumer Choice. Journal of Product
Innovation Management, 22(1), 63-81.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00103.x
Unstructured Citation
fao (2011). Global food losses and food waste – Extent, causes and prevention. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Unstructured Citation
fao (2013). Food wastage footprint. Impacts on natural resources. Summary Report. Food wastage footprint Impacts on natural resources. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Unstructured Citation
Frewer, L.J., Howard, C., Hedderley, D. & Shepherd, R. (1996). What determines trust in information about food-related risks?
Underlying psychological constructs. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 16(4), 473-
86.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb01094.x
Unstructured Citation
Frieling, D., Stricks, V., Wildenberg, M. & Schneider, F. (2013). The Beauty and the Beast – How Quality Management Criteria at Supermarkets Create Food Waste. The 6th International Conference on Life Cycle Management – lcm 2013, August 25-28, 2013, Gothenburg, Sweden (pp. 2011-2014).
Unstructured Citation
Gamble, J., Jaeger, S.R. & Harker, F.R. (2006). Preferences in pear appearance and response to novelty among Australian and
New Zealand consumers. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 41(1), 38-47.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2006.01.019
Unstructured Citation
Gao, Z. & Schroeder, T.C. (2009). Effects of Label Information on Consumer Willingness-to-Pay for Food Attributes. American
Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91 (3), 795-809.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01259.x
Unstructured Citation
Gracia, A. & De Magistris, T. (2007). Organic food product purchase behaviour: a pilot study for urban consumers in the South
of Italy. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(4), 439-451.
https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2007054-5356
Unstructured Citation
Haws, K., Winterich, K.P. & Naylor, R.W. (2014). Seeing the world through greentinted glasses: Green consumption values and
responses to environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(3), 336-354.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.11.002
Unstructured Citation
Jaeger, S.R. & Rose, J.M. (2008). Stated choice experimentation, contextual influences and food choice: A case study. Food
Quality and Preference, 19(6), 539-564.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.02.005
Unstructured Citation
Kader, A.A. (2005). Increasing Food Availability by Reducing Postharvest Losses of Fresh Produce. SHS Acta Horticulturae,
682, 2169-2176.
https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.682.296
Unstructured Citation
Kemp, K., Insch, A., Holdsworth, D.K. & Knight, J.G. (2010). Food miles: Do UK consumers actually care? Food Policy, 35(6),
504-513.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.05.011
Unstructured Citation
Lancaster, K. (1966). A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132-157.
https://doi.org/10.1086/259131
Unstructured Citation
Loebnitz, N. (2015). Who Buys Oddly Shaped Food and Why? Impacts of Food Shape Abnormality and Organic Labeling on Purchase
Intentions. Psychology & Marketing, 32(April), 408-421.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20788
Unstructured Citation
Loebnitz, N. & Grunert, K.G. (2015). The effect of food shape abnormality on purchase intentions in China. Food Quality and
Preference, 40, 24-30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.08.005
Unstructured Citation
Loureiro, M.L. & Umberger, W.J. (2007). A choice experiment model for beef: What US consumer responses tell us about relative
preferences for food safety, countryof-origin labeling and traceability. Food Policy, 32(4), 496-514.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.11.006
Unstructured Citation
Lusk, J. & Schroeder, T. (2004). Are choice experiments incentive compatible? A test with quality differentiated beef steaks.
American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86(2), 467-482.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00592.x
Unstructured Citation
Mann, H.B. & Whitney, D.R. (1947). On a Test of Whether One of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger Than the Other.
Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50-60.
https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177730491
Unstructured Citation
McFadden, D. (1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics (pp. 105-142). New York: Academic Press.
Unstructured Citation
Moser, R., Raffaellib, R., Thilmany-McFadden, D. (2011). Consumer Preferences for Fruit and Vegetables with Credence-Based Attributes: A Review. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 14(2), 121-142.
Unstructured Citation
Nelson, P. (1974). Information and Consumer Behavior, Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 311-329.
https://doi.org/10.1086/259630
Unstructured Citation
Olson, J.C. (1977). Inferential Belief Formation in the Cue Utilization Process. Advances in Consumer Research, 5, 706-713.
Parfitt, J., Barthel, M. & Macnaughton, S. (2010). Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for
change to 2050. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 3065-81.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0126
Unstructured Citation
Scarpa, R., Thiene, M. & Marangon, F. (2008). Using flexible taste distributions to value collective reputation for environmentally-friendly
production methods. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56(2), 145-162.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2008.00122.x
Unstructured Citation
Shewfelt, R.L. & Bruckner, B. (2000). Fruit and Vegetable Quality: An Integrated View. London: Taylor & Francis.
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482293937
Unstructured Citation
Silva, A., Nayga, R.M., Campbell, B.L. and Park, J.L. (2011). Revisiting Cheap Talk with New Evidence from Field Experiment. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 36(2): 280-291.
Unstructured Citation
Steg, L. & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of
Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309-317.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
Unstructured Citation
Stuart, T. (2009). Waste: Uncovering the Global Food Scandal. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
Unstructured Citation
Thurstone, L.L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34(4), 273-286.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070288
Unstructured Citation
Train, K. (2009). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.